SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by Registrantþ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
þ Definitive Proxy Statement  
¨ Definitive Additional Materials  
¨ Soliciting Materials Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12


CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 þ No fee required.
 ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 (5) Total fee paid:
     


 

LOGOLOGO

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

870 North Commons Drive

Aurora, Illinois 60504

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held March 3, 20156, 2018

To our Stockholders:

We are notifying you that the Annual Meeting2018 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation will be held on Tuesday, March 3, 20156, 2018 at 8:00 a.m. local time at Cabot Microelectronics Corporation,our corporate headquarters located at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504 for the following purposes:

1. To elect three directors, each for a term of three years;

2. To hold anon-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation;

3. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2015;2018; and

4. To transact other business properly coming before the meeting.

Each of these matters is described in further detail in the accompanying proxy statement. We also have included a copy of our 20142017 Annual Report. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on January 9, 201512, 2018 are entitled to vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. A complete list of these stockholders will be available at our principal executive offices prior to the meeting.

We are delivering our proxy statement and 20142017 Annual Report under the United States Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders over the internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders, which is designed to reduce our printing and mailing costs and the environmental impact of the proxy materials.materials and our 2017 Annual Report (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”). A paper copy of our proxy materialsProxy Materials may be requested through one of the methods described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Please use this opportunity to take part in our affairs by voting your shares. You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. If you wish to attend the meeting in person, please bring a valid form of photo identification to the meeting. If your stock is not registered in your own name and you plan to attend the meeting and vote in person, you should contact your broker or agent in whose name your stock is registered to obtain a broker’s proxy and bring it to the meeting in order to vote at the meeting.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, your vote is important.Please promptly submit your proxy by telephone, internet or mail by following the instructions found on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card. Your proxy can be withdrawn by you at any time before it is voted.

By order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

William P. Noglows

Chairman of the Board

Aurora, Illinois

This proxy statement is dated January 20, 2015,23, 2018, and is first being made available to stockholders electronically via the internet on or about January 20, 2015.23, 2018.


Table Of Contents

 

About the Meeting

  1 

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

  1 

What is the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

  1 

What are our voting recommendations?How does the board recommend I vote?

  1 

Who is entitled to vote?

  2 

What is the difference between holding shares as a record holder and as a beneficial owner?

  2 

What constitutes a quorum?

  2 

How do I vote, and can I vote by telephone or through the internet?

  2 

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

  3 

Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote after I return my proxy card or after I vote via the internet or by telephone?

  3 

What vote is required to approve each matter that comes before the meeting?

  3 

What happens if additional proposals are presented at the meeting?

  43 

Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the meeting?

  4 

Stock OwnershipProxy Statement Summary

  5 

Stock Ownership

6

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

  56 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  9 

Election of Directors

  109 

Board Structure and Compensation

  12 

Board of Directors and Board Committees

  12 

Criteria for Nominating Directors

15

Compensation of Directors

  16 

Compensation Committee Interlocks And Insider Participationof Directors

  1917 

Fees of Independent AuditorsCompensation Committee Interlocks and Audit Committee ReportInsider Participation

  20 

Fees Billed byof Independent Auditors and Audit Committee Report

  20 

Fees Billed by Independent Auditors

20

Report of the Audit Committee

  21 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

22

Chief Executive Officer Transition

22

Fiscal Year 2014 Executive Compensation Summary

  23 

OverviewFiscal Year 2017 Executive Compensation Summary

  2423 

Elements of CompensationOverview

  2625 

CEOElements of Compensation

  3428 

Regulatory and Other Factors

35

Compensation and Risk

36

Compensation Committee Report

36

ExecutiveCEO Compensation

  37 

Summary Compensation TableRegulatory and Other Factors

  3738 

Employment AgreementsCompensation and Risk

  39 

Standard Employee BenefitsCompensation Committee Report

39

Executive Compensation

  40 

2014 Grants of Plan-Based AwardsSummary Compensation Table

  40 

Executive Officer Deposit Share ProgramEmployment Letter with Mr. Li

  42 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Fiscal Year-EndTransition and Retirement Arrangement with Mr. Johnson

42

New CFO Compensation Arrangement

  43 

2014 Option Exercises and Stock VestedStandard Employee Benefits

43

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

44

Executive Officer Deposit Share Program

  45 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 FiscalPension BenefitsYear-End

  46 

2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation2017 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

  4647 

Pension Benefits

48

2017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

48

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

  4649 

Employment AgreementLetter with Mr. Li

50

Change in Control Severance Protection Agreements

  51 

Change in Control Severance Protection Agreements

51

Treatment of Equity Awards

  53 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

54

Non-binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

  55 

Ratification of the Selection of Independent AuditorsNon-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

  56 

2016 Annual MeetingRatification of Stockholdersthe Selection of Independent Auditors

  56 

2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

57

“Householding” of Proxy Materials

  5657 

Voting Through the Internet or by Telephone

  57 

LOGO


CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

870 North Commons Drive

Aurora, Illinois 60504

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

The Board of Directors of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation is asking for your proxy for use at the annual meeting of our stockholders to be held on Tuesday, March 3, 20156, 2018 at 8:00 a.m. local time, at Cabot Microelectronics Corporation,our corporate headquarters located at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504 and at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.

PursuantIn accordance with and pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are providing our stockholders with access to our proxy materialsProxy Materials over the internet rather than in paper form. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, rather than a printed copy of the proxy materials,Proxy Materials, to our stockholders of record as of January 9, 2015.12, 2018. We expect to mail the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders entitled to vote at our annual meeting on or about January 20, 2015.23, 2018.

ABOUT THE MEETING

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

At our annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the accompanying notice of meeting, including the election of three directors, the non-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation and the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors. including:

1.the election of three directors;

2.thenon-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation;

3.the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors; and

4.Any other business properly coming before the meeting.

In addition, our management will report generally on the fiscal year ended September 30, 20142017 and respond to questions from stockholders.

What is the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

On or about January 20, 2015, we will mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access and review our proxy materials and our 2014 annual report. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materialsProxy Materials and submit your proxy via the internet or phone. If you would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials,Proxy Materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for requesting printed materials.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held March 3, 2015:6, 2018:

 

  

The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available atwww.cabotcmp.com andwww.proxyvote.com.

What are our voting recommendations?How does the board recommend I vote?

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” the election of each of the nominees named below under “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”, “FOR” non-binding advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation and “FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors.

shares:

1.FOR” the election of the nominees named below under “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”;

2.FORnon-binding advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation; and,

3.FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    1


Who is entitled to vote?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date, January 9, 2015,12, 2018, are entitled to receive notice ofand vote at the annual meeting and to vote the shares of common stock that they held on that date at the meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to cast one vote, without cumulation, on each matter to be voted on. As of the record date, we had approximately 25,540,950 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

What is the difference between holding shares as a record holder and as a beneficial owner?

Record Holder.    You are a record holder of our common stock if at the close of business on the record date your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078, our stock transfer agent.

Beneficial Owner.    You are a beneficial owner if at the close of business on the record date your shares were held by a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder of our common stock and not in your name. Being a beneficial owner means that, like most of our stockholders, your shares are held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will be able to vote your shares with respect to some of the proposals, but not all. Please see “What if I did not specify how my shares are to be voted?” for additional information.

What constitutes a quorum?

If a majority of the shares outstanding on the record date are present at the annual meeting, either in person or by proxy, we will have a quorum at the meeting permitting the conduct of business at the meeting. As of the record date, we had approximately 24,086,48925,540,950 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Any shares represented by proxies that are marked to abstain from voting on a proposal will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether we have a quorum. If a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder of our common stock indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, the shares held by that record holder (referred to as “brokernon-votes”) will also be counted as present in determining whether we have a quorum.

How do I vote, and can I vote by telephone or through the internet?

You may vote in person at the annual meeting or you may vote by proxy. If your stock is registered in your own name, you may vote in person by attending the meeting, presenting a valid form of photo identification and delivering your completed proxy card in person. If your stock is not registered in your own name and you plan to attend the meeting and vote in person, you should contact your broker or agent in whose name your stock is registered to obtain a broker’s proxy and bring it to the meeting along with a valid form of photo identification. You may vote by proxy by signing, dating and mailing a proxy card. In addition, you may vote by telephone or through the internet by following the instructions below or those included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

To vote by telephone, if you are a record holder of our common stock, call toll free1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. To vote by telephone if you are a beneficial owner of our common stock, call the toll free number listed in the Proxy Cardproxy card or follow the instructions provided by your broker. For all holders of our common stock (whether record or beneficial), to vote through the internet, go towww.proxyvote.com and follow the steps on the secure website. You also may access the proxyvote website (www.proxyvote.com) or view our proxy materialsProxy Materials by going to our website,www.cabotcmp.com, selecting “Investor Relations” on our Homepage, and then selecting “Annual Meeting/Proxy” from the drop down menu.

If you vote by proxy, the individuals named on the proxy card as proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner you indicate.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    2


What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Record Holder.    If you are a record holder of our common stock and you sign and return the proxy card without indicating your instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR”FOR:

 

the election of the three nominees for director named below under “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS;”

1.the election of the nominees for director named below under “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”;

 

the non-binding advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation; and

2.thenon-binding advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation; and

 

3.the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors.

the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors.

Beneficial Owners.    If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder that holds your shares with voting instructions, such person will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under applicable rules, such person has the discretion to vote on routine matters such as the ratification of our independent auditors, but does not have discretion to vote onnon-routine matters such as the election of directorsa director, and thenon-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation.

Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote after I return my proxy card or after I vote electronically via the internet or by telephone?

Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before the proxy is voted at the annual meeting by delivering to our Secretary a written notice of revocation or a properly signed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the annual meeting and voting in person. (Attendance at the meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request.) To revoke a proxy previously submitted electronically through the internet or by telephone, you may simply vote again at a later date, using the same procedures, in which case the later submitted vote will be recorded and the earlier vote revoked.

What vote is required to approve each matter that comes before the meeting?

Our bylaws provide that director nominees must receive the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting by stockholders entitled to vote thereon, meaning that the three nominees for director with the most votes will be elected. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available through our website,www.cabotcmp.com, provide that in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greaterThe number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certificationrequired to approve each of the stockholder vote for such election. In this situation, our nominating and corporate governance committee then shall consider the resignation offer and recommend to our board of directors whether to accept it. The board of directors then will act on the nominating and corporate governance committee’s recommendation within ninety (90) days following certification of the stockholder vote for such election. Thereafter, the board of directors will promptly disclose its decision whether to accept the director’s resignation offer (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable), in a press releaseproposals scheduled to be disseminated in the manner that we typically distribute press releases.

The non-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes castpresented at the meeting in person or by proxy by stockholders entitled to vote thereon. If the named executive officer compensation is not approved, then our compensation committee and our board of directors will meet following the annual meeting to consider the results of such non-binding stockholder advisory vote.

The ratification of the selection of our independent auditors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy by stockholders entitled to vote thereon. If our independent auditors are not ratified, then our audit committee and our board of directors will meet following the annual meeting to the consider the results of such non-binding ratification vote.

as follows. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining whether an item has received the requisite number of votes for approval.

Proposal

Required Vote

   1.   Election of Directors

For each nominee, a plurality of the votes cast are “FOR” such nominee (i.e., the nominees for director with the most votes will be elected).*

   2.   Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation

A majority of the votes cast are “FOR” the proposal.

   3.   Ratification of the selection of our independent auditors

A majority of the votes cast are “FOR” the ratification.

*Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation to be considered by our nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors as outlined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

What happens if additional proposals are presented at the meeting?

Other than the matters described in this proxy statement, we do not expect any additional matters to be presented for a vote at the annual meeting. If you vote by proxy, your proxy grants the persons named as proxy holders the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    3


Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the meeting?

We will bear all costs of solicitation. Certain directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such activities, may solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone or electronic communication. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to our stockholders. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials,Proxy Materials, we have hired the firm of D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies at an estimated cost of approximately $8,000. We shall bear$9,000.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    4


CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

2018 PROXY STATEMENT – SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement. This summary does not contain all costs of solicitation.

the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date: March 6, 2018

Time: 8:00 a.m. local time

Location: Company Headquarters at 870 North Commons Drive Aurora, Illinois 60504

Record Date: January 12, 2018

GENERAL INFORMATION

Stock Symbol: CCMP

Exchange: NASDAQ

Registrar and Transfer Agent: Computershare

Principal Executive Offices: 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504

Corporate Website: cabotcmp.com

Investor Relations Website: ir.cabotcmp.com

STOCKHOLDER VOTING MATTERS

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:

FOR” the election of each of the nominees named below under “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” on p. 9;

FORnon-binding advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation on p. 56; and,

FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors on p. 56.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Director Composition: 7 Directors

Director Term: 3 Classes with Staggered3-Year Terms

Director Nominees: Class III (3 Directors)

Barbara A. Klein

David H. Li

William P. Noglows

Board Meetings in Fiscal Year 2017: 6 (4 since)

Executive Sessions: 6 (3 since)

Board Committee Meetings in Fiscal Year 2017:

Audit: 8 (3 since)

Compensation: 6 (3 since)

Nominating and Corporate Governance: 4 (1 since)


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Named Executive Officers:

•      David H. Li,President and Chief Executive Officer

•      William S. Johnson,Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

•      H. Carol Bernstein,Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

•      Ananth Naman,Vice President, Asia Pacific, and Chief Technology Officer

•      Daniel D. Woodland,Vice President and Chief Marketing and Operations Officer

Pay Program Aligned with Performance(p. 26)

Clawback Policy(p. 29)

No Hedging/No Pledging(p. 36)

No Repricing or Backdating of Options(p. 34)

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    5


STOCK OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 9, 201512, 2018 (except as indicated below) by:

 

all persons known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding common stock;

 

each of our directors;

 

each of the named executive officers in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section and the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement;proxy statement; and

 

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, each stockholder listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially owned by such stockholder.

Stock Ownership Table

 

Name and Address

  Number of  Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Approximate
Percent of  Class(1)
 

CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS:

   

1. BlackRock, Inc.

    55 East 52nd Street

    New York, New York 10022

   2,690,958(2)   11.2

2. Royce & Associates, LLC

    745 Fifth Avenue

    New York, New York 10151

   1,921,484(3)   8.0

3. Earnest Partners, LLC

    1180 Peachtree Road, Suite 2300 N.E.

    Atlanta, Georgia 30309

   1,911,426(4)   7.9

4. Riverbridge Partners LLC

    80 South 8th Street, #1200

    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

   1,860,676(5)   7.7

5. Price (T.Rowe) Associates Inc.

    P.O. Box 89000

    Baltimore, Maryland 21289

   1,781,376(6)   7.4

6. The Vanguard Group, Inc.

    P.O. Box 2600

    Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482

   1,498,775(7)   6.2

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:

   

William P. Noglows

   627,667(8)   2.6

David H. Li

   65,622(8)   *  

Robert J. Birgeneau

   61,689(8)   *  

John P. Frazee, Jr.

   81,495(8)   *  

H. Laurance Fuller

   131,246(8)   *  

Richard S. Hill

   32,125(8)   *  

Barbara A. Klein

   81,773(8)   *  

Edward J. Mooney

   89,782(8)   *  

Steven V. Wilkinson

   116,200(8)   *  

Name and Address

  Number of  Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Approximate
Percent of  Class(1)
 

Bailing Xia

   87,795(8)   *  

William S. Johnson

   264,863(8)   1.1

Adam F. Weisman

   160,223(8)(9)   *  

Ananth Naman

   39,257(8)   *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)

   2,115,454(10)   8.8
Name and Address

Number of  Shares

Beneficially

          Owned1

Approximate
Percent of Class
1

 

Certain beneficial owners:

1. BlackRock, Inc.

    55 East 52nd Street

    New York, New York 10022

3,324,018

2

13.0%

2. The Vanguard Group, Inc.

    P.O. Box 2600

    Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482

2,377,639

3

9.3%

3. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    270 Park Avenue

    New York, New York 10017

1,793,497

4

7.0%

Directors and executive officers:

David H. Li

125,092

5

*

William P. Noglows

170,078

5 6

*

Richard S. Hill

13,915

5

*

Barbara A. Klein

91,849

5

*

Paul J. Reilly

7,515

5

Susan M. Whitney

34,178

5

*

Geoffrey Wild

34,178

5

*

William S. Johnson8

129,593

5

*

H. Carol Bernstein

72,837

5

*

Ananth Naman

35,309

5

*

Daniel D. Woodland

20,925

5

*

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

836,618

8

3.3%

 *= less than 1%

(1)1

“Beneficial ownership” generally means any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or investment power with respect to a security or has the right to acquire such power within 60 days. Shares of

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    6


common stock subject to options, warrants or rights that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 9, 201512, 2018 are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person holding such options, warrants or rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person. The amounts and percentages are based upon 24,086,48925,540,950 shares of our common stock outstanding as of January 9, 2015.12, 2018, unless otherwise indicated.

(2)2Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, Blackrock,BlackRock, Inc. exercises (a) sole power to vote 2,579,6923,324,018 shares and (b) shared power to vote 0 shares, (c) sole investmentdispositive power over 2,690,958 shares, and (d) shared investment power over 03,324,018 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 2,690,958. BlackRock, Inc. is the parent holding company3,324,018, as of the following investment operating subsidiaries that beneficially own shares: (i) BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited; (ii) BlackRock Advisors, LLC; (iii) BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; (iv) BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; (v) BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; (vi) BlackRock Fund Advisors; (vii) BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.; (viii) BlackRock International Limited; (ix) BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; (x) BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd; (xi) BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; (xii) BlackRock Japan Co Ltd; and (xiii) BlackRock Life Limited.December 31, 2017. The number of shares indicated is based on information reported in Amendment No. 10 to the Schedule 13G/A Holdings Report13G filed by Blackrock,BlackRock, Inc. on January 9, 2015.19, 2018.

(3)Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, Royce & Associates, LLC exercises (a) sole power to vote 1,921,484 shares, (b) shared power to vote 0 shares, (c) sole investment power over 1,921,484 shares, and (d) shared investment power over 0 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,921,484. Various accounts managed by Royce & Associates, LLC have the right to receive or power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds of the sale of the shares. The number of shares indicated is based on information reported in the Schedule 13G/A Holdings Report filed by Royce & Associates, LLC on January 6, 2015.

(4)Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, Earnest Partners, LLC exercises (a) sole power to vote 743,086 shares, (b) shared power to vote 250,504 shares, (c) no power to vote 917,836 shares, (d) sole investment power over 1,911,426 shares, and (e) shared investment power over 0 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,911,426. The number of shares indicated is based on information reported in the Form 13F Holdings Report filed by Earnest Partners, LLC on November 14, 2014.

(5)Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, Riverbridge Partners LLC exercises (a) sole power to vote 1,483,332 shares, (b) shared power to vote 0 shares, (c) no power to vote 377,344 shares, (d) sole investment power over 1,860,676 shares, and (e) shared investment power over 0 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,860,676. This information is based on information reported in the Form 13F Holdings Report filed by Riverbridge Partners LLC on November 5, 2014.

(6)Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, Price (T.Rowe) Associates Inc exercises (a) sole power to vote 675,430 shares, (b) shared power to vote 0 shares, (c) no power to vote 1,105,946 shares, (d) sole investment power over 1,781,376 shares, and (e) shared investment power over 0 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,781,376. This information is based on information reported in the Form 13F Holdings Report filed by Price (T.Rowe) Associates Inc on November 14, 2014.

(7)3Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, The Vanguard Group, Inc. exercises (a) sole power to vote 34,41448,342 shares, (b) shared power to vote 03,700 shares, (c) no power to vote 1,464,3612,325,597 shares, (d) sole investment power over 1,465,8612,327,197 shares, and (e) shared investment power over 32,91450,442 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,498,775.2,377,639, as of September 30, 2017. The number of shares indicated is based on information reported in the Form 13F Holdings Report filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. on November 12, 2014.14, 2017.

(8)4Of the shares reported as beneficially owned, JPMorgan Chase & Co. exercises (a) sole power to vote 1,662,876 shares and (b) sole dispositive power over 1,793,497 shares. The total number of shares reported as beneficially owned is 1,793,497, as of December 29, 2017. The number of shares indicated is based on information reported in Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. on January 18, 2018.
5Includes shares of our common stock that such person has the right to acquire pursuant to stock options granted pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Cabot Microelectronics Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, As Amended and Restated September 23, 2008 (“2000 Equity Incentive Plan”), and pursuant to the Cabot Microelectronics Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended March 7, 2017 (“2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan”), exercisable within 60 days of January 9, 2015,12, 2018, as follows:

 

NameUpon Exercise
Shares  Issuable

Name

Mr. Li

  Upon Exercise
Shares  Issuable

51,200

Mr. Noglows

  505,535

81,949

Mr. LiHill

  26,056

  4,811

Mr. Birgeneau

Ms. Klein

  44,112

64,561

Mr. FrazeeReilly

  61,520

  4,811

Mr. Fuller

Ms. Whitney

  61,520

26,074

Mr. HillWild

  23,625

26,074

Ms. Klein

Mr. Johnson

  63,696

52,300

Mr. Mooney

Ms. Bernstein

  52,816

19,425

Mr. Wilkinson

Dr. Naman

  61,520

16,025

Mr. Xia

Dr. Woodland

  72,400

Mr. Johnson

168,115

Mr. Weisman  3,950

131,937

Dr. Naman

18,999

Also includes restricted shares of common stock awarded to such executive officer pursuant to the 2000 Equity2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan on December 1, 2011,3, 2014 and January 2, 2015, and restricted stock units awarded to such executive officer pursuant to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan on December 3, 2012,2015, December 3, 20135, 2016 and December 3, 2014,5, 2017, respectively, that are still subject to restrictions as of January 9, 2015,12, 2018, as set forth in the table below. On December 1, 2011, December 3, 2012, December 3, 2013 and December 3, 2014, as part of our annual equity incentive award program, we awarded restricted shares to our executive officers with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years exceptand that pursuantmay not be sold or transferred, other than to his Executive Chairman employment letter, all unvestedimmediate family members as provided in the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. On December 3, 2015, December 5, 2016 and December 5, 2017, as part of our annual equity incentive award program, we awarded restricted stock held by Mr. Noglows will vestunits

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    7


to our executive officers with restrictions that lapse in full (1) at end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2)equal increments upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.each anniversary over four years. On January 2, 2015, as part of Mr. Li’s appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, we awarded 14,700 restricted shares to Mr. Li with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary of the award over four years. On January 2, 2015, related to thethis leadership transition, we awarded 22,222 restricted shares to Mr. Johnson with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary of the award over four years. The outstanding restricted stock awards are eligible to receive dividends and have voting rights.

   Equity Incentive Program Restricted Shares 

Name

  12/01/11   12/03/12   12/03/13   12/03/14   1/02/15 

Mr. Noglows

   5,500     12,500     18,750     44,400       

Mr. Li

   1,450     3,000     4,425     5,200     14,700  

Mr. Johnson

   2,175     4,900     6,375     7,100     22,222  

Mr. Weisman

   1,725     3,950     5,400     5,800       

Dr. Naman

   1,375     3,250     4,950     6,100       

Also includes both The outstanding restricted stock unit awards have the same economic value as shares of common stock, that such executive officer has purchased at fair market valueare eligible to receive dividend equivalents, and may not be voted, sold or transferred, other than to immediate family members as “deposit shares” and for which the executive officer has been awarded a matching grant of “award shares”, pursuant to our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, that are still subject to restrictions (with respect to “award shares”) or conditions (with respect to “deposit shares”) as of January 9, 2015 as set forthprovided in the table below. Under this program, our executive officers are entitled to voluntarily use all or a portion of their after-tax annual cash bonus compensation to purchase at fair market value shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and before that, under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. These shares are retained on deposit with us until the third anniversary of the date of deposit (“deposit shares”), and our company matches the deposit with a restricted stock award equal to 50% of the shares deposited by the participant (“award shares”). If the participant is employed by our company on the third anniversary of the deposit date and the deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date, the restrictions on the award shares will lapse. Such executive officer has dividend and voting rights with respect to the restricted shares.

 

Name

Deposit Share Program
Restricted Shares

Mr. Noglows

Mr. Li

1,738

Mr. Johnson

1,967

Mr. Weisman

Dr. Naman

    

Equity Incentive Program Restricted Shares

                     and Restricted Stock Units                    

 

 

Name

 

  

12/03/14

 

   

1/02/15

 

   

12/03/15

 

   

12/05/16

 

   

12/05/17

 

 

Mr. Li

   1,300    3,675    11,000    14,250    6,616 

Mr. Johnson

   1,775    5,556    4,200    7,275     

Ms. Bernstein

   1,200        3,150    6,675    2,300 

Dr. Naman

   1,525        3,000    6,150    2,200 

Dr. Woodland

   390        3,000    6,675    2,900 

Also includes restricted stock units awarded to suchnon-employee director pursuant to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan that are still subject to restrictions as of January 9, 2015,12, 2018, as set forth in the table below. For annual equity awards tonon-employee directors, restricted stock units are currently awarded with restrictions that lapse in full upon the first anniversary of the award. Initial equity awards of restricted stock units tonon-employee directors are currently made with restrictions that lapse in equal annual increments over four years beginning on the datefirst anniversary of the award, as with awards to our employees, including our executive officers. Outstanding restricted stock awards are eligible to receive dividends and have voting rights but may not be sold or transferred, other than to immediate family members as provided in the plan.award. Outstanding restricted stock unit awards have the same economic value as shares of common stock, but do notare eligible to receive dividendsdividend equivalents, and may not be voted, sold or transferred, other than to immediate family members as provided in the plan.

 

Name

  

Non-Employee Director

Restricted Stock Units

Mr. BirgeneauNoglows

  2,000

Mr. Frazee

2,000

Mr. Fuller

2,0001,352

Mr. Hill

  2,6251,352

Ms. Klein

  2,0001,352

Mr. MooneyReilly

  2,704
2,000

Ms. Whitney

  1,977

Mr. WilkinsonWild

  2,000

Mr. Xia

2,000

Also includes phantom shares of our common stock that such non-employee director has the right to acquire pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan as of January 9, 2015, as follows:

Name

Phantom Shares

Mr. Birgeneau*

Mr. Frazee**

14,749

Mr. Fuller

35,938

Mr. Hill*

Ms. Klein*

Mr. Mooney**

9,807

Mr. Wilkinson**

16,641

Mr. Xia*

1,977

 

6 *Messrs. Birgeneau, Hill and Xia and Ms. Klein are not participantsIncludes 58,125 shares of our common stock held in trust for the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.benefit of Mr. Noglows’ spouse, over which Mr. Noglows has no voting or investment power or ownership control.

**Messrs. Frazee and Wilkinson, as of January 1, 2008, and Mr. Mooney, as of January 1, 2009, elected to cease deferral of their compensation pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

(9)7On January 5, 2015, we announced that15, 2018, Mr. Weisman has announcedJohnson resigned from his decision to resign from our company. The effective date of his resignationrole as Executive Vice President Business Operationsand Chief Financial Officer, and Scott D. Beamer was December 31, 2014,appointed as Vice President and he will continue to perform transition responsibilities for us until he resigns his employment on April 1, 2015.Chief Financial Officer.

(10)8Includes all individuals who were directors and executive officers as of January 9, 2015,12, 2018, and does not include individuals who ceased to be executive officers prior to such date, even if such individuals are otherwise named executive officers (e.g.,except for Mr. Weisman).Noglows, who since January 1, 2016 has been anon-employee director. Includes 1,420,360395,078 shares of our common stock that our directors and executive officers have the right to acquire pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of January 9, 2015, 236,02812, 2018, and 124,441 restricted shares of our common stock or restricted stock units held by our executive officers still subject to restrictions as of January 9, 201512, 2018 (which include shares subject to restrictions or conditions pursuant to our Deposit Share Program), and 77,135 phantom shares of our common. Includes 15,232 restricted stock that our non-employee directors have the rightunits held by Mr. Beamer subject to acquire pursuantrestrictions awarded to the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Planhim as of January 9, 2015. Does not include 3,598 restricted covered appreciation rightsthe date of his appointment as Vice President and 1,299 restricted covered units to which a non-U.S. executive officer who is not a named executive officer hasChief Financial Officer. For more detail on Mr. Beamer’s equity awards granted as of the right to receive a cash payment.date of his appointment, see “New CFO Compensation Arrangement” on page 43 of this proxy statement.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    8


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC reports regarding

their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of the reports furnished to us, we believe that all of our directors and executive officers have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements for fiscal year 2014.2017.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors is currently comprised of tenseven directors. The board of directors is divided into three classes: Class I, whose terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2016;2019; Class II, whose terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2017;2020; and Class III, whose terms will expire at the upcoming annual meeting of stockholders. Messrs. Fuller,Mr. Hill and MooneyMs. Whitney are currently in Class I, Messrs. Birgeneau, WilkinsonWild and XiaReilly are currently in Class II, and Messrs. Frazee, Li and Noglows, and Ms. Klein are currently in Class III. Mr. Frazee has decided not to stand for re-election when his term expires at the upcoming annual meeting of stockholders, and therefore will cease to be a member of the board of directors as of such time. At such time, the board of directors will be comprised of nine directors, with three directors in Class III.

At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors for the successors to directors whose terms will then expireclass of which term expires at the annual meeting will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Our certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors, and that the board of directors may increase or decrease the authorized number of directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist ofone-third of the total number of directors. Our certificate of incorporation also provides that our board of directors may fill any vacancy created by the resignation of a director or the increase in the size of our board of directors.

The board of directors has nominated and urges you to vote “FOR”FOR the election of the three nominees named below for termsa term of office ending in 2018.2021.

In the event a nominee isthe nominees are not available to serve for any reason when the election occurs, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of the other nominees and may be voted for any substitute nominee.nominees. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will not be a candidatecandidates or, if elected, will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.directors. In no event will the proxies be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    9


Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election to the board of each of the nominees named below.

Nominees for Director for termsa term that expireexpires in 2018:2021:

Barbara A. Klein, 60, was elected a director of our company in April 2008. Ms. Klein also is a director of Ingredion, Inc. She retired in May 2008 as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation. Prior to that, Ms. Klein held a variety of senior finance positions including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dean Foods Company, Vice President and Corporate Controller of Ameritech Corporation, and Vice President and Corporate Controller of Pillsbury Co. She is a certified public accountant. Ms. Klein received a B.S. in accounting and finance from Marquette University, and a M.B.A. from Loyola University. Based upon Ms. Klein’s management and director experience and her accounting and finance background discussed above, the board has concluded Ms. Klein should serve as a director of our company.

Barbara A. Klein, 63

Committee

Membership:

•     Audit (Chair)

•     Nominating and
Corporate
Governance

Ms. Klein was elected a director of our company in April 2008. Ms. Klein also is a director of Ingredion, Inc. She retired in May 2008 as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation. Prior to that, Ms. Klein held a variety of senior finance positions including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dean Foods Company, Vice President and Corporate Controller of Ameritech Corporation, and Vice President and Corporate Controller of Pillsbury Co. She is a certified public accountant. Ms. Klein received a B.S. in accounting and finance from Marquette University, and an M.B.A. from Loyola University. Based upon Ms. Klein’s management and director experience and her accounting and finance background discussed above, the board has concluded Ms. Klein should serve as a director of our company.

David H. Li, 45

Committee

Membership:

•     None

Mr. Li was elected a director of our company in January 2015. Mr. Li has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2015. From June 2008 through December 2014, Mr. Li served as our Vice President of the Asia Pacific Region. Prior to that role, Mr. Li served in various leadership roles, including as our Managing Director of China and Korea, and our Global Business Director for Tungsten and Advanced Dielectrics. Prior to that, he held a variety of leadership positions in operations, sourcing and investor relations since joining us in 1998. Mr. Li received a B.S. in chemical engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from Northwestern University. Based upon Mr. Li’s management experience, his knowledge of our company, its operations and customers, his knowledge of the chemical and semiconductor industries, and his Asia-focused, cross-border business experience, the board has concluded Mr. Li should serve as a director of our company.

William P. Noglows, 59

Committee

Membership:

•     None

Mr. Noglows has served as our Chairman since 2003, and was our President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2003 through December 2014. Mr. Noglows also is a director of Aspen Aerogels, Inc. and Littelfuse, Inc. From 1984 through 2003, he served in various management positions at Cabot Corporation, culminating in serving as an executive vice president and general manager. While there, he was one of the primary founders of our company and was responsible for identifying and encouraging the development of the CMP application, which is the core of our business. Mr. Noglows had previously served as a director of our company from December 1999 until April 2002. Mr. Noglows received his B.S. in chemical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Based upon Mr. Noglows’ management experience, his knowledge of our company and its operations, and his knowledge of the chemical and semiconductor industries, the board has concluded Mr. Noglows should serve as a director of our company.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    10

David H. Li, 42, was elected a director of our company in January 2015. Mr. Li has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2015. From June, 2008 through December 2014, Mr. Li served as our Vice President of the Asia Pacific Region. Prior to that role, Mr. Li served in various leadership roles, including as our Managing Director of China and Korea, and our Global Business Director for Tungsten and Advanced Dielectrics. Prior to that, he held a variety of leadership positions in operations, sourcing and investor relations since joining us in 1998. Mr. Li received a B.S. in chemical engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A.


from Northwestern University. Based upon Mr. Li’s management experience, his knowledge of our company, its operations and customers, his knowledge of the chemical and semiconductor industries, and his Asia-focused, cross-border business experience, the board has concluded Mr. Li should serve as a director of our company.

William P. Noglows, 56, has served as our Chairman since 2003 and our President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2003 through December 2014. Mr. Noglows also is a director of Aspen Aerogels, Inc. and Littlefuse, Inc. From 1984 through 2003, he served in various management positions at Cabot Corporation, culminating in serving as an executive vice president and general manager. While there, he was one of the primary founders of our company and was responsible for identifying and encouraging the development of the CMP application, which is the core of our business. Mr. Noglows had previously served as a director of our company from December 1999 until April 2002. Mr. Noglows received his B.S. in chemical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Based upon Mr. Noglows’ management experience, his knowledge of our company and its operations, and his knowledge of the chemical and semiconductor industries, the board has concluded Mr. Noglows should serve as a director of our company.

Directors whose terms continue until 2016:2019:

H. Laurance Fuller, 76, was elected a director of our company in June 2002. Mr. Fuller retired from the position of Co-Chairman of BP Amoco, p.l.c. in 2000 after serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Amoco Corporation since 1991 and President since 1983. He also has served as director of various entities including Abbott Laboratories, J.P. Morgan Chase, Motorola, Inc. and Security Capital Group Incorporated. Mr. Fuller received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University. Based upon Mr. Fuller’s management and director experience and his technical background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Fuller should serve as a director of our company.

Richard S. Hill, 66

Committee

Membership:

•     Audit

•     Nominating and Corporate
Governance (Chair)

Mr. Hill was elected a directorof our company in June 2012. Mr. Hill retired as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Novellus Systems, Inc. in June 2012 after serving in these positions since 1996, and since 1993 as CEO upon his joining Novellus. Prior to leading Novellus, Mr. Hill held various senior leadership and management positions with Tektronix, Inc., General Electric, Inc., Motorola, Inc., and Hughes Aircraft, Inc. Mr. Hill also serves as a director of Arrow Electronics, Inc., Xperi, Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., and Autodesk, Inc. He received a B.S. in bioengineering from the University of Illinois and a M.B.A. from Syracuse University. Based upon Mr. Hill’s management and director experience and his technical background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Hill should serve as a director of our company.

Susan M. Whitney, 67

Committee

Membership:

•     Audit

•     Compensation (Chair)

Ms. Whitney was elected a director of our company in April 2015. Ms. Whitney, a35-year veteran of the IBM Corporation, retired as the General Manager of IBM System X in 2007 after leading the IBM Server Group, and directing IBM’s globalx86-based server division. Prior to that, she served in numerous executive leadership roles, including marketing and sales responsibilities for the IBM Asia Pacific and IBM Midwest organizations. Ms. Whitney also serves as a director of the College of Mt. St. Vincent, and served as a director of LSI Logic Corporation prior to its acquisition by Avago Technologies, Ltd. in 2014. She received her B.A. in mathematics and economics from the College of Mt. St. Vincent. Based upon Ms. Whitney’s management and director experience and her background in technology companies discussed above, the board has concluded Ms. Whitney should serve as a director of our company.

Richard S. Hill, 63, was elected a director of our company in June 2012. Mr. Hill retired as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Novellus Systems, Inc. in June 2012 after serving in these positions since 1996, and since 1993 as CEO upon his joining Novellus. Prior to leading Novellus, Mr. Hill held various senior leadership and management positions with Tektronix, Inc., General Electric, Inc., Motorola, Inc., and Hughes Aircraft, Inc. Mr. Hill also serves as a director of Arrow Electronics, Inc., Planar Systems, Inc., and Tessera Technologies, Inc. He received a B.S. in bioengineering from the University of Illinois and a M.B.A. from Syracuse University. Based upon Mr. Hill’s management and director experience and his technical background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Hill should serve as a director of our company.

Edward J. Mooney, 73, was elected a director of our company in March 2005. He also serves as a director of FMC Technologies, Inc. and the Northern Trust Corporation, and has served on the boards of Commonwealth Edison, Inc., FMC Corporation and PolyOne Corporation. Mr. Mooney was the Delegue General-North America, Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux from March 2000 until his retirement in March 2001. From 1994 to 2000, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nalco Chemical Company. Mr. Mooney received both a B.S. in chemical engineering and a J.D. from the University of Texas. Based upon Mr. Mooney’s management and director experience and his knowledge of the chemical industry discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Mooney should serve as a director of our company.

Directors whose terms continue until 2017:2020:

Robert J. Birgeneau, 72, was elected a director of our company in March 2005. In June, 2014, he concluded his service as the Chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, a position he had held since September 2004. He holds a faculty appointment in the departments of physics and materials science and engineering there. From July 2000 until assuming his position at Berkeley, Mr. Birgeneau served as the President of the University of Toronto. Prior to that, Mr. Birgeneau was the Dean of the School of Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and previously had been the chair of its physics department. Mr. Birgeneau received his B.S. in mathematics from the University of Toronto and his Ph.D. in physics from Yale University. Based upon Mr. Birgeneau’s management experience and his science and technology background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Birgeneau should serve as a director of our company.

Paul J. Reilly, 61

Committee

Membership:

•     Audit

•     Compensation

Mr. Reilly was elected a director of our company in March 2017. Mr. Reilly served as an executive vice president of Arrow Electronics, Inc. through his retirement in January 2017, and previously had served as its executive vice president, finance and operations, and chief financial officer from 2001 through May 2016, and head of global operations from 2009 through May 2016. Prior to joining Arrow in 1991, Mr. Reilly was a certified public accountant in the business assurance practice of the New York office of KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Reilly also serves as a director of Assurant, Inc., and comScore, Inc. He has a B.S. in accounting from St. John’s University. Based upon Mr. Reilly’s management and director experience and his accounting and finance background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Reilly should serve as a director of our company.
Geoffrey Wild, 61

Committee

Membership:

•     Compensation

•     Nominating and Corporate
Governance

Mr. Wild was elected a director of our company in September 2015. Mr. Wild has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Atotech since March 2017, and previously was the Chief Executive Officer of AZ Electronic Materials from January 2010 until April 2015. Prior to that, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cascade Microtech, Inc., having previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Nikon Precision, Inc. Mr. Wild also serves as a director of Materion Corporation, and served as a director of Axcelis Technologies, Inc. from 2006 to 2011. He received his B.S. in chemistry from the University of Bath, UK. Based upon Mr. Wild’s management and director experience and his technical background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Wild should serve as a director of our company.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    11

Steven V. Wilkinson, 73, was elected a director of our company in April 2000. He is also a director of Entergy Corporation. Mr. Wilkinson has been retired since 1998. Prior to retirement, he was a partner of Arthur Andersen LLP. During his tenure with Arthur Andersen LLP, Mr. Wilkinson served clients across many industries, including chemical, electric and gas distribution, telecommunications, steel and transportation. He is a certified public accountant. Mr. Wilkinson received his B.A. in economics from DePauw University and his M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Based upon Mr. Wilkinson’s management experience and his accounting and finance background discussed above, the board has concluded Mr. Wilkinson should continue to serve as a director of our company.

Bailing Xia, 59, was elected a director of our company in September 2007. He is the Chairman of Summer Leaf, Inc., a privately-held company, headquartered in Toronto, Canada, and has served in that role since 1996. He has been the Chief Representative in North America for China Central Television (CCTV) for education, science, technology, culture and health programs since 1994. In April 2007, Mr. Xia was appointed a Member of the Planning Committee of the China Development Bank. In February, 2010, Mr. Xia was appointed a Senior Advisor of China Certification & Inspection Group (CCIC). He also served as a director of Lingo Media International, Inc. Mr. Xia holds a degree in economics from Anhui University, and also graduated from the Sino-American Scientific Technology, Industry and Business Administration Program. Based upon Mr. Xia’s management experience and his Asia-centric cross-border business experience, the board has concluded Mr. Xia should serve as a director of our company.


BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPENSATION

Board of Directors and Board Committees

Board Leadership

Our independent directors hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive session, at which only independent directors are present. As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Chairman of the nominating and governance committee, Mr. Hill, serves as chairman of the meetings of the independent directors in executive session and performs other responsibilities of a lead director such as working with the Chairman of the board of directors to plan and set the agenda for meetings of the board of directors. Mr. Noglows is theOurnon-executive Chairman of the board of directors and prior to January 1, 2015, also was the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company. Effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Li became our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Noglows continued as Chairman of the Board in an Executive capacity through December 2016. Thus, from and after January 1, 2015, our company has had a separate Chairman of the Board of directors (Mr. Noglows) and a separate President and Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Li), an approach that our board believes has provided a smooth leadership transition and structure for our company.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The board of directors has an oversight role, as a standingwhole and at the committee level, in overseeing management of our risks. Our board focuses on our general risk management strategy, the most significant risks facing us, and oversees the implementation of risk mitigation strategies by management. The board regularly reviews information regarding our credit, liquidity, and operations, as well as risks associated with each. The compensation committee of the board is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our employee compensation plans, policies, and programs, as well as our annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in each proxy statement. The audit committee a standing compensation committee and a standingof the board oversees the management of financial risks. The nominating and corporate governance committee to assistof the board is responsible for overseeing the management of directorsrisks related to corporate governance matters. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing management of such risks, the entire board is regularly informed through the committees about such risks, and reviews and discusses them in the dischargecontext of its responsibilities. our overall risk posture and risk management and mitigation strategies.

Corporate Governance

Our board of directors has adopted the Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com, along with other corporate governance materials, such as board of directorsdirectors’ committee charters and our Code of Business Conduct. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and other corporate governance materials and practices, our board of directors and committees, particularly the audit committee, periodically review and provide oversight of the management of various risk factors that are relevant to our company. Our board of directors also reviews annually the functioning of the board. During fiscal year 2014, our board of directors held 16 meetings

Shareholder Engagement and did not take action by written consent. EachCommunications with Directors

Our company values the perspectives of our directors attended at least 75%shareholders, and has a variety of all the meetings of the board and those committees onmeans by which he or she served during fiscal year 2014. With respect to our annual meeting ofwe engage with them. Also, stockholders in fiscal year 2014, all of our directors attended. Since the end of fiscal year 2014, the board of directors has met seven times and took action by written consent twice. Stockholders and third parties may communicate with our board of directors, thenon-employee directors or any individual director (including any committee chair) through the Chairman of the Board, c/o the Secretary of our company, at our offices at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504. Depending on the nature of the communication and to whom it is directed, the Secretary of our company will: (a) forward any communication to the appropriate director or directors; (b) forward the communication to the relevant department within the company; or (c) attempt to handle the matter directly (for example, a communication dealing with a share ownership matter).

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    12


Independent Directors and Leadership Structure.

The board of directors has determined that sevenfive of our nineseven current directors, (Mr. Frazee will cease to be a member of the board of directors following the upcoming annual meeting of stockholders and the size of the board will be reduced accordingly to nine directors), including Messrs. Birgeneau, Fuller, Hill, Mooney, Wilkinson,Reilly and XiaWild, and Ms. Klein and Ms. Whitney, are “independent” directors as defined in Rule 4200 of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (“NASDAQ”) Marketplace Rules and as defined in applicable rules by the SEC. In making its determinations of independence, in addition to consideration of the relevant SEC and NASDAQ rules (according to which the definition of “independent director” is set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines)Guidelines, a current copy of which is available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com), the board of directors considered factors for each director such as any other directorships, any employment or consulting arrangements, and any relationship with our company’s customers, suppliers or advisors.

Board Refreshment and Succession Planning

Our independentboard of directors hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive session, at which only independent directors are present. As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Chairmanreviews its own composition, and considers and plans for an orderly transition of the nominatingboard, including with respect to planning for potential retirements and governance committee serveswith respect to identifying potential candidates for service as

chairman new directors. As part of the meetings of the independent directors in executive session and performs other responsibilities of a lead director such as working with the Chairman ofthis process, the board of directors routinely evaluates the need for board refreshment and focuses on identifying individuals whose skills and experiences will enable them to plan and setmake meaningful contributions to the agenda for meetingsshaping of the boardfuture of directors. Following the upcoming annual meeting of stockholders, our board of directors will appoint committees and chairmanships, pursuant to its usual practice, and our board of directors will appoint another independent director to replace Mr. Frazee as the Chairman of the nominating and governance committee, and such Chairman will serve as chairman of the meetings of the independent directors in executive session. Mr. Noglows is the Chairman of the board of directors and prior to January 1, 2015, also was the President and Chief Executive Officer of our company. The board of directors believedbelieves it has made considerable strides towards these goals over the past three years.Underscoring these refreshment efforts, the board of directors has refreshed approximately 73% of its directors since 2015.Mr. Li joined the board of directorsin January 2015 in connection with his appointment as the company’s president and chief executive officer. The company also recently added three new independent directors, Ms. Whitney in April 2015, Mr. Wild in September 2015, and Mr. Reilly in March 2017. The board of directors believes all of these individuals have the relevant experience and expertise to complement that this leadership structure was appropriate at the time for our company given the size and scope of our business,other directors, and to further contribute to the experience and active involvementboard’s ongoing guidance of our independent directors, andcompany; since 2015, the board has transitioned through the retirement of six long-serving directors. Over time, our corporate governance practices, which include regular communication with and interaction between and among Mr. Noglows and the independent directors. The board believed that this approach served to provide for the board’s role in corporate governance and guiding corporate policy in an efficient manner. Effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Li became our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Noglows has continued as Chairman of the Board. Thus, from and after January 1, 2015, our company has a separate Chairman of the Board of directors (Mr. Noglows)expects to continue to focus on board refreshment and a separate Presidentthis transition process to inject relevant expertise, new skill sets, and Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Li), an approach that our board believes is appropriate while Mr. Noglows as Chairmandiverse perspectives.

Board and Mr. Li as Chief Executive Officer work to ensure a smooth leadership transition for our company. Stockholders and third parties may communicate with our independent directors through the Chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee, c/o the Secretary of our company at our offices at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504. Committee Meeting Attendance

During fiscal year 2014,2017, our board of directors held six meetings and took action by written consent once. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of all the meetings of the board and those committees on which he or she served during fiscal year 2017, and all directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders in fiscal year 2017. Since the end of fiscal year 2017, the board of directors has met four times and has taken action by written consent twice. During fiscal year 2017, our independent directors met in executive session tensix times. Since fiscal year end, our independent directors have met in executive session sixthree times.

Committees of the Board

The board has three standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee. The following chart sets forth the directors who currently serve as members of each of the board committees.

Directors

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Corporate

Governance Committee

Richard S. Hill

X     

C

Barbara A. Klein

C     

X

Paul J. Reilly

X     

X

Susan M. Whitney

X     

C

Geoffrey Wild

X

X

“C” denotes member and chairman of committee

“X” denotes member of committee

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    13


Audit Committee.

The members of the audit committee are currently Messrs. Hill and Reilly, Ms. Klein (Chair) and Ms. Whitney. The board has determined that each of these audit committee members during fiscal year 2017 and currently are independent as defined by NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and under the applicable rules adopted by the SEC and that all such members are financially literate.

The functions of the audit committee include include:

selecting, appointing, retaining, compensating and overseeing our independent auditors, auditors;

deciding upon and approving in advance the scope of audit andnon-audit assignments and related fees, fees;

reviewing accounting principles we use in financial reporting,reporting; and,

reviewing the adequacy of our internal control procedures, including the internal audit function. The members of the audit committee are currently Messrs. Frazee, Hill and Wilkinson and Ms. Klein (Chair); Mr. Frazee will cease to be a member when he ceases to be a director as of the upcoming annual meeting. Each of these audit committee members during fiscal year 2014 and currently:

is an “independent” director as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules;

meets the criteria for independence as required by applicable rules adopted by the SEC;

has not participated in the preparation of our financial statements or the financial statements of any of our current subsidiaries at any time during the past three years; and

is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements.

Our board of directors has determined that the audit committee has at least one member who qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined by relevant SEC rules, and has designated Ms. Klein, the Chair of the audit committee, as such Audit Committee Financial Expert. As previously stated, Ms. Klein is an independent director.

The audit committee operates under a written charter, a current copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A and is available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com. The audit committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the audit committee charter on an annual basis. The audit committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as for thepre-approval of services provided by our independent auditors, both of which are also available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com. A current copy of the procedures for the pre-approval of services provided by our independent auditors is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B. As set forth in the audit committee charter, the audit committee is also responsible for the review and approval of any related party transaction in advance of the company entering into any such transaction; since April 2002, we have not been engaged in any related party transactions and none have been proposed to the audit committee for consideration.

The audit committee met eight times during fiscal year 20142017 and did not take action by written consent, and has met twicethree times since fiscal year end with respect to the audit of our fiscal year 2014

2017 financial statements and related and other matters, and has not taken action by written consent. In fulfillment of the audit committee’s responsibilities for fiscal year 2014,2017, Ms. Klein, the audit committee Chair, reviewed our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20142017 (as did the other members of the committee and board of directors), and our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q before we filed them, and Ms. Klein and other members of the audit committee (and board of directors) also reviewed quarterly earnings announcements and related matters before we released them.

Compensation Committee.The members of the compensation committee are currently Messrs. Reilly and Wild, and Ms. Whitney (Chair), each of whom the board determined was during fiscal year 2017 and is now an “independent” director as defined by NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and as defined in applicable rules adopted by the SEC. Further, the members of the compensation committee each satisfy the enhanced eligibility requirements applicable to compensation committee members of listed companies set forth in NASDAQ listing standards.

The functions of the compensation committee include include:

reviewing and approving the compensation and benefits for our employees, employees;

evaluating and deciding upon the compensation of our chief executive officer, officer;

evaluating and deciding upon the compensation of our other executive officers, which is done following consultation with our chief executive officer, officer;

monitoring the administration of our employee benefit plans, plans;

authorizing and ratifying stock option grants, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, other equity awards (such as performance share unit awards), and other incentive arrangements,arrangements; and,

authorizing employment and related agreements.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    14


Our chief executive officer is neither present for voting or deliberation on, nor votes upon decisions relating to, his compensation. In addition, our chief executive officer does not vote upon decisions related to the compensation of our other executive officers. Also, our vice president of human resources and her staff support the compensation committee in its work by providing input and recommendations on the overall mix and forms of executive compensation as directed by the compensation committee. Our vice president of human resources and human resources staff do not make decisions regarding the amount of compensation for our named executive officers or other executive officers.

The compensation committee has engaged the services of aan independent compensation consultant, which reports directly to the committee. Prior to April 2017, W.T. Haigh & Company, Inc. (“W.T. Haigh”), which reports directly served as the independent compensation consultant to the committee.committee, and effective April 2017, the committee has engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its independent compensation consultant. The consultant has been engaged to advise the compensation committee on executive officer compensation and equity incentive matters and trends and to perform benchmark comparison analysis of compensation practices of peer companies. From time to time, and as part of the compensation committee’s ongoing and annual reviews of executive officer compensation matters, the consultant recommends specific ranges of compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, based on information provided by the committee regarding different performance scenarios and desired positioning with respect to market placement.compensation ranges. The consultant also advises the nominating and corporate governance committee onnon-employee director compensation matters. The consultant provides no other services to our company. The compensation committee also has reviewed the independence of the consultant in light of SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards regarding compensation consultants and has concluded that the consultant’s work for the committee and for the nominating and corporate governance committee is independent and does not raise any conflict of interest.

The members of the compensation committee are Messrs. Birgeneau, Fuller (Chairman), Hill, Mooney and Xia, each of whom was during fiscal year 2014 and is now an “independent” director as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and as defined in applicable rules adopted by the SEC. Further, the members of the compensation committee each satisfy the enhanced eligibility requirements applicable to compensation committee members of listed companies set forth in newly approved NASDAQ listing standards. The compensation committee operates under a written charter that addresses compensation matters, a current copy of which is available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com. The compensation committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the compensation committee charter (including under NASDAQ listing standards) on an annual basis. The compensation committee met six times during fiscal year 20142017 and did not taketook action by written consent once, and has met fourthree times since the fiscal year end with respect to 20142017 annual bonuses, salary increases, equity awards (including stock option grants, and restricted stock awards,unit and performance share unit awards), and other matters, and tookhas taken action by written consent twice.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The functions of the nominating and corporate governance committee include reviewing and recommending a slate of nominees for the election of directors, recommending changes in the number, classification and term of directors, reviewing nominations by stockholders with regard to the nomination process, reviewing and recommending compensation and other matters for our non-employee directors, and attending to general corporate governance matters.    The members of

the nominating and corporate governance committee are currently Messrs. Frazee (Chairman), FullerHill (Chair) and WilkinsonWild, and Ms. Klein, each of whom was during fiscal year 20142017 and is now an “independent” director as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of theby NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and as defined in applicable rules adopted by the SEC. Mr. Frazee will cease to be a member when he ceases to be a director as of the upcoming annual meeting; as of such time, another independent director will become a member

The functions of the nominating and corporate governance committee include:

reviewing and serve as its chairman. recommending a slate of nominees for the election of directors;

recommending changes in the number, classification and term of directors;

reviewing nominations by stockholders with regard to the nomination process;

reviewing and recommending compensation and other matters for ournon-employee directors;

reviewing and recommending succession planning for the chief executive officer, and other executive officers, which may be done in concert with the compensation committee; and,

attending to general corporate governance matters.

The nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a formalwritten charter that addresses the nominations process and such related matters as may be required under the federal securities laws and NASDAQ listing requirements, a current copy of which is available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com. The nominating and corporate governance committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the nominating and corporate

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    15


governance charter on an annual basis. The nominating and corporate governance committee met threefour times during fiscal year 2014,2017, did not take action by written consent, and has met three timesonce since fiscal year end and tookhas not taken action by written consent once.consent. The nominating and corporate governance committee acted unanimously to recommend the nomination of the Class IIIII director nominees to the board of directors, subject to stockholder approval, as discussed in “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” above.

Criteria for Nominating Directors

The nominating and corporate governance committee considers candidates to fill new directorships created by expansion and vacancies that may occur and makes recommendations to the board of directors with respect to such candidates. The nominating and corporate governance committee considers suggestions from many sources regarding possible candidates for director and will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. Any such stockholder nominations, together with appropriate biographical information, should be submitted to the Chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee, c/o the Secretary of our company at our offices at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504. To be included in the proxy statement, such nomination must be received by the Secretary of our company not later than the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s proxy statement.

In fiscal year 2014,2017, we did not pay a fee to any third party to identify or evaluate potential director nominees; however, in the future we may pay a fee to a third party to identify or evaluate potential director nominees if the need arises, given the important role our directors play in guiding our strategic direction and overseeing the management of our company.

Board candidates are selected based upon various criteria including, their but not limited to, their:

character and reputation, reputation;

relevant business experience and acumen, and acumen;

relevant educational background. Some of the factors that are considered in evaluating candidates for the board of directors include background;

experience in areas such as technology, manufacturing, marketing, finance, strategy, international business, and academia, as well as academia; and

geographic, cultural, experiential and other forms of diversity.

The nominating and corporate governance committee and board of directors review these factors, including diversity, in considering candidates for board membership. Board members are expected to prepare for, attend and participate in all board of directors and applicable committee meetings, and our annual meetings of stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee considers a director’s past attendance record, participation and contribution to the board of directors in considering whether to recommend the reelection of such director.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    16


Compensation of Directors

The following table shows information concerning the compensation that the company’snon-employee directors earned during the last completed fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2017. A director who is also our employee receives no additional compensation for his or her services as a director.

2014Fiscal Year 2017 Director Compensation

 

Name 

Fees Earned

or Paid

in Cash

($)1

  Stock
Awards
($)2
  Options
Awards
($)2
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Robert J. Birgeneau

  70,000    89,600    99,591    —      259,191  

John P. Frazee, Jr.

  97,500    89,600    99,591    —      286,691  

H. Laurance Fuller

  95,000    89,600    99,591    —      284,191  

Richard S. Hill

  82,500    89,600    99,591    —      271,691  

Barbara A. Klein

  101,250    89,600    99,591    —      290,441  

Edward J. Mooney

  70,000    89,600    99,591    —      259,191  

Steven V. Wilkinson

  88,750    89,600    99,591    —      277,941  

Bailing Xia

  70,000    89,600    99,591    —      259,191  

Name

 

 

Fees Earned
or Paid

in Cash ($)1

 

  

Stock
Awards
($)
2

 

  

Option
Awards
($)
2

 

  

All Other
Compensation
($)

 

  

Total

($)

 

 

William P. Noglows

 

  

 

140,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,883

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

5,043

 

 

 

  

 

333,686

 

 

 

Robert J. Birgeneau3

 

  

 

39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

3,272

 

 

 

  

 

42,272

 

 

 

Richard S. Hill

 

  

 

115,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,883

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

2,717

 

 

 

  

 

306,360

 

 

 

Barbara A. Klein

 

  

 

115,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,883

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

3,434

 

 

 

  

 

307,077

 

 

 

Paul J. Reilly4

 

  

 

51,250

 

 

 

  

 

187,766

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

6,975

 

 

 

  

 

340,751

 

 

 

Susan M. Whitney

 

  

 

115,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,883

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

3,238

 

 

 

  

 

306,881

 

 

 

Geoffrey Wild

 

  

 

90,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,883

 

 

 

  

 

94,760

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

278,643

 

 

 

Steven V. Wilkinson3

 

  

 

39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

4,950

 

 

 

  

 

43,950

 

 

 

Bailing Xia3

 

  

 

39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

39,000

 

 

 

 

1     

Includes an annual retainer fee and committee fee, and, as applicable, committee chairperson annual retainer fees, both earned quarterly, and, as applicable, committee chairperson annual retainer fees, earned annually, each as discussed in more detail below. Dollar amounts are comprised as follows:

 

Name

  Annual
Retainer Fee
   Committee
Membership
Fees
   Committee
Chair Fee
 

Mr. Birgeneau

  $60,000    $10,000    

Mr. Frazee, Jr.*

  $60,000    $22,500    $15,000  

Mr. Fuller**

  $60,000    $20,000    $15,000  

Mr. Hill

  $60,000    $22,500    

Ms. Klein***

  $60,000    $22,500    $18,750  

Mr. Mooney

  $60,000    $10,000    

Mr. Wilkinson***

  $60,000    $22,500    $6,250  

Mr. Xia

  $60,000    $10,000    

Name

 

 

Annual
Retainer Fee

 

  

Committee
  Chair Fee  

 

  

Non-
Executive
Board

 Chair Fee 

 

 

Mr. Noglows

 

  

 

$90,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

$50,000

 

 

 

Mr. Birgeneau

 

  

 

$39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mr. Hill*

 

  

 

$90,000

 

 

 

  

 

$25,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Ms. Klein**

 

  

 

$90,000

 

 

 

  

 

$25,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mr. Reilly

 

  

 

$51,250

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Ms. Whitney***

 

  

 

$90,000

 

 

 

  

 

$25,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wild

 

  

 

$90,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wilkinson

 

  

 

$39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mr. Xia

 

  

 

$39,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 *Nominating and corporate governance committee chairmanchair

 

 **CompensationAudit committee chairmanchair

 

 ***AuditCompensation committee chair (Mr. Wilkinson served until the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders in March 2014 and Ms. Klein has served since such time)

2     The amounts in the column headed “Stock Awards” represent the aggregate award date fair value of awards made in fiscal year 2017 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). For these restricted stock unit awards, the fair value is equal to the underlying value of the stock and is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the award date. The actual value realized by anon-employee

The amounts in the column headed “Stock Awards” represent the aggregate award date fair value of awards made in fiscal year 2014 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). For these restricted stock unit awards, the fair value is equal to the underlying value of the stock and is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the award date. The actual value realized by a non-employee director related to restricted stock unit awards will depend on the market value of our common stock on the date the underlying stock is sold following vesting of the awards.

The amounts in the column headed “Option Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants in fiscal year 20142017 computed in accordance with ASC 718 (see Note 1113 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year 20142017 for a description of the assumptions used in that computation). The actual value realized by anon-employee director related to option awards will depend on the difference between the market value of our common stock on the date the option is exercised and the exercise price of the option.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    17


The award date fair market value of each “Stock Award” and the grant date fair market value of each “Option Award” awarded or granted to ournon-employee directors during fiscal year 2017, computed in accordance with ASC 718 excluding(excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures for service-based vesting conditions, of each “Stock Award” awarded to our non-employee directors during fiscal year 2014conditions), is as follows:

 

Name

  Award Date   Number of
Restricted Stock
Units
   Award Date Fair
Value ($)
 

Mr. Birgeneau

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Frazee

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Fuller

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Hill

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Ms. Klein

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Mooney

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Wilkinson

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

Mr. Xia

   3/4/14     2,000     89,600  

The grant date fair market value computed in accordance with ASC 718 (such amount is included in the amounts under “Option Awards” in the 2014 Director Compensation Table), and the grant date fair market value computed in accordance with SFAS 123R, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures for service-based vesting conditions, of each “Option Award” granted to our non-employee directors during fiscal year 2014 is as follows:

Name

  Grant Date   Number of
Options
   Grant Date Fair
Value ($)
  

Award or
  Grant Date  

 

  

Number of
  Restricted Stock  
             Units            

 

  

  Award Date Fair  
        Value ($)        

 

  

  Number of   
    Options    

 

  

Grant Date
  Fair Value ($)  

 

 

Mr. Noglows

 3/7/17  1,352  93,833  4,811  94,760 

Mr. Birgeneau

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591                 

Mr. Frazee

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591  

Mr. Fuller

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591  

Mr. Hill

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591   3/7/17  1,352  93,833  4,811  94,760 

Ms. Klein

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591   3/7/17  1,352  93,833  4,811  94,760 

Mr. Mooney

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591  

Mr. Reilly

 3/7/17  2,704  187,766  4,811  94,760 

Ms. Whitney

 3/7/17  1,352  93,833  4,811  94,760 

Mr. Wild

 3/7/17  1,352  93,833  4,811  94,760 

Mr. Wilkinson

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591                 

Mr. Xia

   3/4/14     6,000     99,591                 

During fiscal year 2014,2017, no stock awards toheld by any of ournon-employee or other directors were modified or cancelled (forfeited).

The aggregate number of stock awards and the aggregate number of stock option awards forheld by eachnon-employee director that were outstanding as of the end of fiscal year 20142017 are as follows:

 

  Aggregate Number of Awards
Outstanding as of September  30,
2014
  

Aggregate Number of Awards
  Outstanding as of September  30,  
                            2017                             

 

 

Name

  Stock Awards*   Option Awards  

  Stock Awards*  

 

  

  Option Awards  

 

 

Mr. Noglows

 1,352  81,949 

Mr. Birgeneau

   2,000     52,816        

Mr. Frazee

   2,000     76,026  

Mr. Fuller

   2,000     61,520  

Mr. Hill

   2,625     25,500   1,352  20,449 

Ms. Klein

   2,000     63,696   1,352  64,561 

Mr. Mooney

   2,000     52,816  

Mr. Reilly

 2,704  4,811 

Ms. Whitney

 1,977  27,949 

Mr. Wild

 1,977  27,949 

Mr. Wilkinson

   2,000     61,520      68,454 

Mr. Xia

   2,000     72,400      10,454 

 

 *Restricted Stock Units.

Ournon-employee directors received an aggregate of 48,000 stock options28,866 stockoptions and 16,0009,464 restricted stock units in fiscal year 2014.2017.

3Messrs. Birgeneau’s, Wilkinson’s and Xia’s terms expired at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders in March 2017.

4Mr. Reilly was elected to the board of directors effective March 7, 2017.

As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the nominating and corporate governance committee charter, the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the board of directors compensation (cash and equity) fornon-employee directors. The committee does this through review of director compensation benchmark information and analysis and recommendation provided by W.T. Haigh,the independentnon-employee director compensation consultant to the committee.committee, which as of April 2017 is Meridian, and prior to that was W.T. Haigh.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    18


As a resultpreviously disclosed, the board of such review following the close of fiscal year 2010, and confirmed pursuant to an additional review following the close of fiscal year 2013,directors approved our currentnon-employee director compensation program effective March 2011 at the time of our annual meeting in March 2016, with the boardobjective of directors, upon the recommendationcontinuing our company’s ability to attract high caliber and experienced individuals to serve as directors. Ournon-employee director compensation program consists of the nominating and corporate governance committee, approved certain changes to the compensation program for non-employee directors, as summarized below, and since then, non-employee directors have been eligible for the following compensation:elements:

 

Description of Director Compensation, Effective March 20112016

 

Amount  Amount/Value  

 

Annual Retainer Fee*Fee1

  $60,00090,000 

Committee Membership Fee*Chair Annual Retainer Fees1:

 

Audit committee member

$12,500

Compensation committee member

$10,000

Nominating and corporate governance committee member

$10,000

Committee Chair Annual Retainer Fees*:

Audit committee chairperson

  $25,000 

Compensation committee chairperson

  $15,00025,000 

Nominating and corporate governance committee chairperson

  $15,00025,000 

No Standing Committee or Board Meeting Fees**Fees2

Annual Non-qualified Stock Option Grant***

  6,000 optionsX 

Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award***Non-Executive Board Chair Fee3

  2,000 units$50,000 

AnnualInitial Non-qualified Stock Option Grant****Grant4

  7,500 options$90,000 

InitialAnnual Restricted Stock Unit Award****Award4

  2,500 units$90,000

Initial Restricted Stock Unit Award5

$90,000 

 

*1Paid quarterly beginning with the quarter end following each the effective date of appointment, and subsequently, beginning with the quarter end following our annual meeting. Directors do not receive additional compensation for serving as committee members.

**2To the extent a special committee is established by board of directors to address a unique matter, a committee meeting fee of $1,500 will be provided.

 

***3If anon-executive serves as Chair of the Board, he or she will receive a retainer amount in addition to the annual retainer fee.

4Made at the time of our annual meeting (or initial appointment to the board of directors, on apro-rata basis according to the number of days left until the subsequent annual meeting from the initial date of election) based on a fixed dollar value, with 100% vesting occurring on the first anniversary of the grant/award date.All equity awards made under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan are subject to aper-participant annual limit. Numberof units are calculated consistent with methodology used to calculate employee awards, usingmultiple-day average stock price in advance of award date (annual meeting), and Black-Scholes value of option grants, as applicable.

 

****5Made as of the effective date of appointment to the board ofNew directors with vesting occurring 25% immediatelyreceive initial restricted stock unit awards, based on the grant/a fixed dollar value. Each award date, andvests 25% per year on the next threefirst four anniversaries of the grant/award date.

Upon anon-employee director’s termination of service as a director of the company for reason of Death, Disability or a Change in Control, as defined in the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan and/or an award agreement, theeach grant or award ofnon-qualified stock options and restricted stock units held by the director will be fully vested.vest in full. In addition, if at the time of termination of service for any reason other than by reason of Cause, Death, Disability or a Change in Control, as defined in the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan and/or an award agreement, thenon-employee director has completed at least two full terms as a director, as defined in our bylaws, theeach grant or award ofnon-qualified stock options and restricted stock units held by the director will be fully vested.vest in full.

Under our Directors’ Cash Compensation Umbrella Program, which only applies tonon-employee directors and is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on December 10, 2003, eachnon-employee director may choose to receive his or her compensation either in cash, in fully vested restricted stock under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (and formerly under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan) (as of the date the fees are earned, the fees would be converted into the equivalent number of fully vested restricted shares, which would be beneficially owned and reported on Form 4 filings), or as deferred compensation under our Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended September 23, 2008, which first became effective in March 2001, and is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2008. At present, non-employee directors receive their annual retainer and committee chair and member fees on a quarterly basis. Non-employee directors also are eligible for reimbursement of travel and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in attending meetings. Non-employee directors are not eligible for any other compensation arrangement.

Prior to January 1, 2008, Messrs. Frazee, Fuller, Mooney, and Wilkinson had each elected to defer his compensation to future periods under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Messrs. Frazee and Wilkinson, as of January 1, 2008, and Mr. Mooney, as of January 1, 2009, each elected to no longer defer his compensation under the plan. Under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan,

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    19


deferred amounts are payable only in the form of our common shares. A participating director is required to elect a date on which deferred compensation will begin to be distributed, which date generally must be at least two years after the end of the year deferrals are made and no later than the date of termination. As of the date the compensation is earned, the fees are converted into the right to acquire the equivalent number of shares of common stock at the end of the deferral period. These rights to acquire shares under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan are reported as beneficially owned on Form 4 filings for each participating director. As of January 9, 2015, an aggregate of approximately $1,965,790 of directors’ compensation wasdirector; nonon-employee directors currently participate in, and no amounts are deferred under, the plan,Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. At present,non-employee directors receive their annual retainer and ascommittee chair fees on a quarterly basis.Non-employee directors also are eligible for reimbursement of September 30, 2014, the amount was $1,942,040.travel and otherout-of-pocket costs incurred in attending meetings.Non-employee directors are not eligible for any other compensation arrangement.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the current or former members of the compensation committee are or have been our employees.

FEES OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Fees Billed by Independent Auditors

During fiscal years 20142017 and 2013,2016, the audit committeepre-approved 100% of all audit andnon-audit services provided by our independent auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. For suchpre-approval of services, the audit committee follows its policy for thepre-approval of services provided by our independent auditors, a current copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B and also is available on ourweb-site,www.cabotcmp.com. The policy requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services and other services performed by the independent auditor. This policy provides forpre-approval by the audit committee of permitted services before the independent auditor is engaged to perform them. The audit committee has delegated to the chair of the audit committee authority to approve permitted services. The following table presents fees for audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014,2017, and September 30, 2013,2016, and fees billed for other services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during those periods.

 

Fees

  Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2014 ($)
   Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2013 ($)
 

Audit Fees(1)

   1,845,545     1,544,009  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

          

Tax Fees(3)

   788,061     493,743  

All Other Fees(4)

   4,500     4,500  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,638,106     2,042,252  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Fees Fiscal Year Ended
  September 30, 2017 ($)  
  Fiscal Year Ended
  September 30, 2016 ($)  
 

 

 Audit Fees1

 

  

 

1,686,826

 

 

 

  

 

2,058,164

 

 

 

 

 Audit-Related Fees2

 

  

 

20,000

 

 

 

  

 

93,000

 

 

 

 

 Tax Fees3

 

  

 

204,813

 

 

 

  

 

123,843

 

 

 

 

 All Other Fees4

 

  

 

4,500

 

 

 

  

 

4,500

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

    1,916,139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    2,279,507

 

 

 

 

 

(1)1Audit Fees include fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and review of financial statements included in our Form10-Q and for services that normally would be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. In addition to including fees for services necessary to perform an audit or review in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, this category also may include services that generally only PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

 

(2)
LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    20


2Audit-Related Fees include assurance and related services traditionally performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and not reported under the “Audit Fee” heading, including any employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, accounting consultationsdue diligence and audits in connection with acquisitions, internal control reviews, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. For fiscal years 2014 and 2013,year 2017, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not provide anyprovided certain accounting consultation services considered Audit-Related Services to us.us in the amount of $20,000. For fiscal year 2016, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provided Audit-Related Services to us in the amount of $93,000.

 

(3)3Tax Fees include all services performed by professional staff in PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s and its foreign affiliates’ tax divisions except those services related to the audit, and include fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. Tax compliance generally involves preparation of original and amended tax returns, and claims for refund. Tax planning and tax advice encompass a diverse range of services, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities. For fiscal year 2014,2017, out of Tax Fees of $788,061, which included non-recurring fees related to tax planning services, $258,064$204,813, $44,525 was for tax compliance services. For fiscal year 2013, $352,7002016, out of the total $493,743 for Tax Fees of $123,843, $39,065 was for tax compliance services.

 

(4)4All Other Fees include fees for fiscal years 20142017 and 20132016 for access toon-line accounting research software tools.

Report of the Audit Committee

The following report of the audit committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference therein.

The audit committee of the board of directors is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of our accounting and system of internal controls, the quality and integrity of our financial reports, and the independence and the selection, appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the performance of our independent auditors. The audit committee is composed of independent directors and operates under a written charter, a current copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A and is available on our website,www.cabotcmp.com. The audit committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the audit committee charter on an annual basis. Our board of directors has determined that the audit committee has at least one member who qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined by relevant Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC rules, and has designated Ms. Klein, the Chair of the committee, as such Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Management is responsible for our internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report on those financial statements. The audit committee monitors and oversees these processes.

In this context, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 20142017 with management and with the independent auditors. Specifically, the audit committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communications with Audit Committees), which as of December 31, 2016 is referred to as AS No. 1301, and which include, among other things:

 

methods used to account for any significant and unusual transactions;

 

the effect of any significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus;

 

the process used by management in formulating any particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the independent auditors’ conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates; and

 

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    21


any disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles, the basis for management’s accounting estimates, and the disclosures in the financial statements.

The audit committee believes strongly in the principles underlying the requirement that independent auditors maintain their independence in strict compliance with applicable independence rules. The audit committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent auditors the issue of the independent auditors’ independence from the company and management. In addition, in accordance with the SEC’s auditor independence requirements, the audit committee has considered whether the independent auditors’ provision ofnon-audit services to the company is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditors and has concluded that it is.

Based on its review of the audited financial statements and the various discussions noted above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2017.

Respectfully submitted by the audit committee,

John P. Frazee, Jr.

Richard S. Hill

Barbara A. Klein, Chair

Steven V. Wilkinson

Paul J. Reilly

Susan M. Whitney

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    22


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In this section, we discuss and analyze our executive officer compensation program and how we compensated each of our named executive officers identified in the following table in fiscal year 2014.2017. The individuals listed below include our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers based on total compensation.

 

Name Title

William P. Noglows David H. Li

 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

William S. Johnson

 Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Adam F. Weisman

Executive Vice President, Business Operations

Ananth Naman H. Carol Bernstein

 Vice President, ResearchSecretary and DevelopmentGeneral Counsel

David H. Li Ananth Naman

 Vice President, Asia Pacific, Regionand Chief Technology Officer

 Daniel D. Woodland

Vice President and Chief Marketing and Operations Officer

ChiefAs previously disclosed, on January 15, 2018, Mr. Johnson resigned as Executive Officer Transition

On December 16, 2014, we announced that after more than eleven years of Mr. Noglows’ serving as our Chairman of the Board of Directors,Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer effective January 1, 2015, David H. Li, previously ourand Scott D. Beamer was appointed Vice President, Asia Pacific Region, would succeed him as our President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer of the Company. A description of the compensation arrangements with Mr. Noglows continuing to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board, consistent with our board of directors’ long-term planning for a seamless transition of executive leadership. Also, effective as of January 1, 2015, Mr. Li was elected as a member of the board of directors. Related to this transition, on December 12, 2014, we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Noglows that provides for the continuation of his employment with our company until December 31, 2015, or such other date that may be mutually agreed upon by usJohnson and Mr. Noglows, in the role of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. Under this employment letter, which replaces the original oneBeamer entered into with Mr. Noglows on November 2, 2003 upon his employment with us, Mr. Noglows remains an employee and member of the board of directors. In consideration of Mr. Noglows continuing to serve as our Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and of the other terms of the employment letter, Mr. Noglows’ base salary was reduced to $500,000 and his target bonus under our Annual Incentive Program continues to be 100% of his base salary. Except in connection with a change of control of our company, as set forth in Mr. Noglows’ Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement previously entered into in 2008, (i) in the event that Mr. Noglows’ employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter, Mr. Noglows would receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to the base salary he would have received had he continued totransition can be employed for the remainder of his employment term as Executive Chairman, and (ii) in the event that Mr. Noglows’ employment is terminated by us without cause, Mr. Noglows would receive a pro-rata bonusfound under the Annual Incentive Program. Receipt of severance under the employment letter is subject to Mr. Noglows’ executionheadings, “Transition and non-revocation of a release of claims against us. Mr. Noglows will continue to be eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements applicable to employees and executive officers of our company, and to those that applied to him prior to January 1, 2015. All unvested stock options and restricted stock held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by our company without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by our company of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against our company.

On December 12, 2014, we entered into an employment letterRetirement Arrangement with Mr. Li setting forth the material terms of Mr. Li’s employment as our PresidentJohnson” and Chief Executive Officer as of January 1, 2015. Pursuant to the employment letter, Mr. Li’s initial base salary is now $550,000, and his target bonus under our Annual Incentive Program is now 100% of his base salary. Mr. Li also received a non-qualified stock option grant covering 38,500 shares of our common stock and an award of 14,700 restricted shares of our common stock, each with an award

date of January 2, 2015. The option and restricted shares are scheduled to vest upon each anniversary in 25% increments over four years, subject to Mr. Li’s continued service, and the options have an exercise price equal to $46.82, the closing price of our common stock on January 2, 2015.

Except in connection with a change of control of our company, as set forth in Mr. Li’s Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement previously entered into in 2008, in the event that Mr. Li’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Li due to a material breach by us of the employment letter, (1) Mr. Li would be entitled to vesting of stock options and restricted shares held by him, including those described above, to the extent that such awards would have otherwise vested in accordance with their terms during the twelve-month period“New CFO Compensation Arrangement,” following the date of termination, (2) Mr. Li would continue to receive his base salary for twelve months and (3) to the extent applicable, we would maintain for 60 days the lease for Mr. Li’s Shanghai housing if such lease is then in effect. Receipt of severance and the accelerated vesting described above is subject to Mr. Li’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.Summary Compensation Table below.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Li’s employment in connection with a change of control of our company, Mr. Li’s rights are set forth in his existing change in control agreement, and as of January 1, 2015, the severance amount multiple pursuant thereto is three times, and the benefits continuation period is 36 months.

Mr. Li is eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements applicable to our employees and executive officers. Due to the significant amount of time Mr. Li is expected to spend in Asia and the United States, Mr. Li is also entitled to the continued provision of a car and driver in China on the same basis as applied prior to January 1, 2015, a housing allowance of up to $100,000 per year to be used for housing expenses in Shanghai, China and Aurora, Illinois, and a tax equalization benefit, on the same basis as applied prior to January 1, 2015.

Fiscal Year 20142017 Executive Compensation Summary

Our executive compensation program is structured to align our named executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, by linking compensation to business objectives and performance, and to attract and retain talented executives. In general, our executive officers, including William P. Noglows,David H. Li, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, during fiscal year 2014, and our other named executive officers, are eligible for, and participate in, our compensation and benefits programs according to the same general terms as those available to all of our employees. Our executive compensation program is administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors, which is composed solely of independent directors. The key elements of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives. The compensation committee is responsible for determining the level of compensation paidawarded to our named executive officers and our other executive officers. The compensation committee targets compensation levels that take into account current market practices and believes that offering market-comparable pay opportunities allows our company to maintain a successful and stable successful executive team.

Our company delivered solidstrong financial and operational results in fiscal year 2014 as a result of2017, with record revenue, and for the third consecutive year, record earnings performance. These results reflect the efforts of our global workforce, led by Mr. NoglowsLi and our other executive officers, including our named executive officers.

Highlights included an increase in overallfor the year included:

Record Revenue of $507.2 million (increase of approximately 18% over fiscal year 2016);

Record annual revenue from sales of our slurries for polishing tungsten (increase of approximately 20% over fiscal year 2016);

Record annual revenue from sales of our polishing pads (increase of approximately 32% over fiscal year 2016);

Continued broad transformation of dielectrics slurry product area, as we advanced the commercialization of a new family of much higher performing solutions (increase of approximately 21% over fiscal year 2016);

Record Net Income of $87 million (increase of 45.3% over fiscal year 2016);

Record Diluted Earnings Per Share of $3.40 (increase of approximately 40% over fiscal year 2016);

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    23


Strong Gross Profit Margin of 50.1% of revenue (increase of approximately 130 basis points over fiscal year 2016);

Strong Operating Incomeof 22.1% of revenue (increase of approximately 480 basis points over fiscal year 2016);

Record Cash Flow from Operations of approximately $141 million, continues to demonstrate our strong cash flow model;

Strong Balance Sheet, with fiscal year end cash balance of approximately $398 million and total debt outstanding of approximately $144 million; and

Cash Dividends of $33 million declared to our stockholders since January 2016, pursuant to our regular quarterly cash dividend program.

The highlights of our 2017 executive compensation program resulting from our integrated circuit (IC) CMP consumables products, which is the core of our business, from fiscal year 2013, and record revenue in our Pads, Aluminum and Advanced Dielectrics product areas, as well as growth in our Tungsten product area, accentuated by our receipt of seven supplier excellence awards. However, our overall2017 company financial results decreased from the strong results of fiscal year 2013 with respect to revenue, gross profit margin, net income and earnings per share, as a result of a variety of factors, including soft semiconductor industry conditions in the first half of the fiscal year, and lower revenue in our QED Technologies and Data Storage product areas. For fiscal year 2014, we reported annual revenue of $424.7 million, gross profit margin of 47.8 percent of revenue, annual net income of $50.8 million, and earnings per share of $2.04. Despite the decline in our financial results for fiscal year 2014, we believe our overall results reflect our continued successful execution of the company’s long-term strategic initiatives, such as our renewed focus on greater technological collaboration with customers, enhanced innovation of products for leading-edge applications, and supply chain excellence.

performance were:

The company’s performance in most areas did not meet the company’s fiscal year 2014 performance goals that were established by the compensation committee of our board of directors. Thedirectors established aggressive performance goals for our company for fiscal year 20142017 to help drive our efforts to achieve our strategic initiatives both for the year and as part of the achievement of our long-range strategy, which include enhanced performance from that of the prior year. Despite the difficulty of these goals, that were not met were financial goals that includedthe company’s fiscal year 2017 performance for revenue and operating income (expressed as a percentage of revenue) both exceeded the “stretch” level, and performance for gross profit margin (expressed as a percentage of revenue) achieved between the “target” and earnings per share; the 2014 performance goal that was exceeded was a nonfinancial goal related to certain growth objectives. “stretch” level.

As described in greater detail below, based on the methodology for determining awards under our Short-Term Incentive Program (“STIP”), because of our company’s overall performance with respect to our fiscal year 20142017 performance goals based on the methodology for determining awards underas compared to fiscal year 2016 performance against goals, our Annual Incentive Program,employees and executive officers, including Mr. Li and our employeesother named executive officers, earned annual cash bonuses under the Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP that resulted in smaller annual cash bonuseswere significantly larger than in fiscal year 2013, based on the strong performance2016, in fiscal year 2013 thatwhich we also had met or exceeded more of our fiscal year 2013set stringent performance goals, as compared with performance against the goals for fiscal year 2014. Using a similar methodology, the compensation committee, in evaluating the performance of our company in fiscal year 2014 against our fiscal year 2014 performance goals, determined awards to be made under the Annual Incentive Program to our executive officers, including Mr. Noglows and our other named executive officers, which resulted in smaller annual cash bonuses being earned by them as compared with fiscal year 2013. Following the end of fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee awarded annual long term equity incentives under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan that reflected a methodology and terms and conditions generally consistent with annual award cycles of the past few years, but with values somewhat reduced to be more aligned with the lower end of the target range for comparable benchmark positions, as described more fully below. With respect to base salaries, following the end of fiscal year 2013, after two years of slight to modest increases to the base salaries of our named executive officers awarded by the compensation committee consistent with the company’s strategy to maintain base salaries in line with market comparables, for 2014, in consideration of market comparables and the additional responsibilities assumed during fiscal year 2013 by each of Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weisman, who were named executive vice presidents, and market comparables for Dr. Naman and Mr. Li, the compensation committee elected to award Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman, Dr. Naman and Mr. Li base salary increases of 4.8%, 6.1%, 10% and 5%, respectively; the compensation committee awarded Mr. Noglows a base salary increase of 5.6% based on market comparables. Following the end of fiscal year 2014, for 2015, in consideration of market comparables, the compensation committee did not award any increasemeet threshold for one goal (revenue), and in the other two goals (gross profit margin and operating income), only achieved the threshold level of performance.

Long-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2017 (granted in December 2016) to our named executive officers and other executive officers under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan were solely in the form ofequity—non-qualified stock options and restricted stock units—to further link the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. These awards reflected a methodology and terms and conditions generally consistent with annual award cycles of the past few years, with values again aligned with the target range for comparable benchmark positions, as described more fully below. For these fiscal year 2017 awards granted in December 2016, to reflect market practices, executive officers (other than Mr. Li), like our other employees, received 70% of the value of their long-term equity incentive awards as restricted stock units, and 30% asnon-qualified stock options; the value received by Mr. Li was comprised of 50% restricted stock units and 50%non-qualified stock options.To further enhance the link between the interests of our executive officers and those of our stockholders, as of our fiscal year 2018 equity awards (granted in December 2017), our executive officers now receive40% (50% for Mr. Li) of their long-term incentive awards as performance-based awards spanning a three-year performance period, as described more fully below.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    24


We maintain several compensation program features and corporate governance practices to the base salaries of Mr. Noglows, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman,provide both a strong link between executive pay, company performance and Mr. Li; thestockholder interests, and a competitive executive compensation committee awarded Dr. Naman a base salary increase of 3.4% in consideration of market comparables. In November 2014, the compensation committee established performance goals for our company for fiscal year 2015. As described above in consideration of the change in respective responsibilities, effective January 1, 2015 the compensation committee increased Mr. Li’s base salary from $336,000 to $550,000 in consideration of his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer of our company, and decreased Mr. Noglows’ salary from $640,000 to $500,000 to reflect his continuing service as only our Executive Chairman of the board of directors as of such date.program:

WHAT WE DO

      Independent Compensation Committee Makes All Decisions Related to Executive Compensation (see pages 14, 25)

      Pay Program Aligned with Performance and with Business Strategy (see page 26)

      Link of Substantial Portion of Total Compensation to Company Performance

      Performance-Based Equity Awards as of December 2017 (Fiscal Year 2018) (see page 35)

      Balanced Mix of Performance Measures in Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Programs (see pages 30 through 35)

      Market-Based Compensation (see pages 26, 27)

      Annual Compensation Risk Review(see page 39)

      Cash and Equity Clawback Policy for Executive Officers(see pages 29, 36)

      Limited Perquisites and Personal Benefits

      Hold Annual Say on Pay Vote(see page 26)

      Independent Compensation Consultant for Compensation Committee(see pages 15, 27)

WHAT WE DON’T DO

X     No Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock(see page 36)

X     No Repricing or Backdating of Stock Options(see page 34)

X     No Loans to Executive Officers

X     No Individual Benefit Plans for Executive Officers, Including Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans(see pages 28, 36, 37)

X     No Current Payout of Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Equity Awards

X     No Defined Benefit Pension Plan(see page 48)

X     NoGross-Ups for 280G Excise Taxes Pursuant to Post-2008 Change in Control Severance Protection Agreements(see pages 51, 52)

Overview

General.    Our executive compensation program is administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors, which is composed solely of independent directors. The compensation committee is responsible for determining the level of compensation paid to our named executive officers and our other executive officers, including determining awards under and administering the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and its predecessor, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. The compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and establishing all other executive officer compensation programs and plans that we may adopt from time to time. During, and for, fiscal year 2014,2017, the compensation committee made all decisions pertaining to the compensation of our named executive officers and our other executive officers. The compensation committee also reviewed and approved the methodology used for compensation of our general employee population. Our chief executive officer is neither present for voting or deliberation on, nor votes upon decisions relating to, his compensation. In addition, our chief executive officer does not vote upon decisions related to the compensation of our other executive officers. Although ourOur chief executive

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    25


officer evaluates the performance of our other executive officers, including the named executive officers, discusses the compensation and mix and forms of compensation of the other executive officers with the compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant and with the committee, and makes recommendations to the committee with respect to the compensation of the other

executive officers,officers. However, the committee makes all final decisions regarding the executive officers’ compensation. Also, our vice president of human resources and her human resources staff support the compensation committee in its work by providing input and recommendations on the overall mix and forms of executive officer compensation, and discuss such matters with the committee’s independent compensation consultant, as directed by the compensation committee. Our vice president of human resources and her human resources staff do not make decisions regarding the amount of compensation for our named executive officers or other executive officers, and are not present for voting or deliberation on, any such matters.

As part of its responsibilities pursuant to its charter, the compensation committee also authorizes and reviews thenon-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation, as described in our proxy statement. At our 20142017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved the company’s named executive officer compensation, as described in our 20142017 proxy statement, with approximately 91%92% of the votes cast in favor of the matter. Our compensation committee and our board of directors met following the 20142017 annual meeting to consider the results of suchnon-binding stockholder advisory vote and made no changes to the company’s executive compensation program as a result of such vote. The compensation committee has determined that thenon-binding stockholder advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation should be submitted to our stockholders for approval annually.annually, and has authorized and reviewed the 2017non-binding stockholder advisory vote on such frequency.

Compensation Policy and Overall Objectives.    In determining the amount and composition of executive officer compensation, the committee’s goal is to provide compensation that will enable us to:

 

attract and retain talented executives,

align compensation with business objectives and performance, and

link the interests of our executive officers to the interests of our stockholders.stockholders,

align compensation with business objectives and performance, and

attract and retain talented executives.

In general, executive officers, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers, are eligible for, and participate in, our compensation and benefits programs according to the same general terms as those available to all of our employees. For example, the terms and conditions of our annual equity incentivenon-qualified stock option and restricted stock unit awards under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and its predecessor the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan are the same for our executive officers as they are for our other employees. Similarly, the health and welfare benefit programs in the countries in which we operate are the same for all of our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers; all executive officers participate in the same Employee Stock Purchase Plan,tax-qualified savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) andnon-qualified supplemental savings plan (the “Supplemental Plan”), according to the same terms, as all of our employees. Aside from thechange-in-control severance protection agreements with our named executive officers and other executive officers, and an employment agreementsagreement with Mr. Noglows and Mr. Li, all of which are described in greater detail either above or in the “Executive Compensation” section below, we do not have general post-termination of service agreements with our executive officers. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, under which they are entitled to voluntarily use all or a portion of their after-tax bonus compensation to purchase, at fair market value, shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These shares are retained on deposit with us until the third anniversary of the date of deposit (“deposit shares”), and our company matches the deposit with a restricted stock grant equal to 50% of the shares deposited by the participant (“award shares”) subject to certain terms and conditions, as described in greater detail below in the section entitled “Executive Compensation.” As stated above, as of fiscal year 2018, in order to more closely link long term incentives with company performance and the interests of our stockholders, our executive officers began to receive a significant percentage of annual equity awards as performance-based awards, which are more fully described below.

Competitive Compensation and Benchmarking.    The compensation committee believes that each element of the compensation program should target compensation levels that take into account current market practices. Offering market-comparable pay opportunities allows us to maintain a successful and stable successful management team. Our direct competitors in our core business of developing, manufacturing, and selling CMP slurries and pads are generally not stand-alone publicly-traded entities; therefore, our market for compensation

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    26


comparison purposes is comprised of a group of companies that develop, manufacture, supply or use a variety of semiconductor products, equipment and processes, including companies that have similar levels of revenue, market capitalization, and employment, as well as comparable geographic presence. The compensation committee considers changes to the composition of this group from time to time based on changes in our or others’ business, and last revised the group during fiscal year 20142017 based on recommendations made by the outsideindependent compensation consultant to the compensation committee, W.T. Haigh.who as of April 2017 is Meridian. These most recent revisions were made in light of changes in the size and scope of others’ business (i.e., Axcelis, Cree, and Mattson), and various mergers and acquisition activity (i.e., Aeroflex, Cymer, and Triquint) in the prior group over the last year and to account for fluctuations among certain members of the prior several years,group in terms of revenue and as other comparable companies are identified.market capitalization. The compensation committee first used the current group for comparison purposes as of the end of fiscal year 20142017 to consider benchmarks for fiscal year 20142017 annual cash bonuses, and fiscal year 20152018 base salaries, annual cash bonus targets, and long termlong-term equity incentive awards, and intends to continue to use it for all comparison purposes. The current group is comprised of the following companies:

 

Advanced Energy Industries  Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
ATMI, Inc.Micrel Semiconductor, Inc.
AZ Electronic Materials, Inc.Park Electrochemical Corp.
Brooks Automation, Inc.  Photronics, Inc.Macom Technology Solutions
Cognex Corporation  PMC Sierra,Photronics, Inc.
Coherent, Inc.  QLogicRogers Corporation
Electro Scientific Industries,Cohu, Inc.  RogersSemtech Corporation
Entegris, Inc.  Semtech CorporationXperi Corp. (Tessera Technologies, Inc.)
FormFactor, Inc.Tessera Technologies, Inc.
II-VI, Inc.  Veeco Instruments, Inc.
II-VI, Inc.Versum Materials, Inc.

In evaluating the comparison group for compensation purposes, the compensation committee, in consultation with an outsideindependent compensation consultant hired by the committee currently(Meridian, and previously, W.T. Haigh,Haigh), exercises its discretion and makes its judgment regarding executive officer compensation matters after considering all relevant factors. In general, it is the goal of the compensation committee that each element of compensation and total compensation for our named executive officers and our other executive officers fallfalls within the 50th to 75th percentile for comparable positions within the comparison group.group, with certain elements, such as base salary and target annual cash bonuses, positioned closer to the 50th percentile. However, a direct correlation may not always exist between the roles, responsibilities, experience and tenureperformance of each of our executive officers and those of the position that appears to best correspond to such individual at companies within the comparison group.group, and in these situations, the compensation committee also may use a comparison to another index, such as those forsimilarly-sized technology companies (collectively, “comparison group”). In addition, a direct correlation may not always exist between the relevant time period of evaluation given that the fiscal year end of companies within the comparison group is in most cases different from the company’s fiscal year end of September 30, thereby making direct or any comparison difficult, especially when significant macro-economic or semiconductor industry changes occur that materially affect business performance and therefore, compensation differently and in different reporting periods, for each the company and the companies within the comparison group. The timing of the commencement of, and recovery from, the severe global economic recession that began in 2008 is one such example.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    27


Elements of Compensation

The key elements of our compensation program for our named executive officers and other executive officers, are:

base salary,

annual cash bonuses, and

long-term equity incentives.

In addition, we provide our named executive officers and other executive officers with:

change in control severance protection agreements, and in some limited circumstances post-termination agreements, and

the same retirement and other benefits provided to our employees generally.

Descriptions of these elements and the reasons we provide them, to our named executive officers and other executive officers are providedset forth in the following table:

 

Element Description Reason Provided

Base Salary

 

Fixed amount paid in cash twice per month, as for all of our employees.

 

As for all of our employees, provides named executive officers with a steady, predictable amount of fixed income with merit increases fromtime-to-time based on performance and market comparisons (if provided, usually effective on January 1 of the calendar year following such evaluation).

Annual Cash Bonuses (Annual(Short-Term Incentive Program, pursuant to 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

 

Cash payment made within 75 days following completion of fiscal year depending on company and individual performance, as for all of our employees.

 

As for all of our employees, aligns compensation with business objectives and performance by communicating goals and motivating individuals to achieve these goals, and rewarding performance actually achieved.

Long-Term Equity Incentives (2012(currently, pursuant to 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan and prior thereto, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan)

 

Restricted Stock/Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Initial, Annual and Deposit Share Program) and Stock Option Grants (Initial, Annual),and as of fiscal year 2018 (granted December 2017), Performance Share Units (Annual)(for Executive Officers).

 

As for all of our employees who receive awards pursuant to our equity incentive plan, “at risk” (and now long-term performance goal-based) nature of equity awards links interests with those of our stockholders; provides ongoing retention mechanism over vesting periods.

Change in Control Severance Protection Benefits for Executive Officers and other Key Employees (and Post-Termination Agreement for Chief Executive Officer)

 

Salary and other benefits paid if terminated within a certain period of time pursuant to a Change in Control of our company (three years’ salary and other benefits for Chief Executive Officer; two years’ for other Executive Officers other than Principal Accounting Officer; one yearyear’s for Key Employees and Principal Accounting Officer).

 

Assures company of dedicated executive and key employee team, notwithstanding the possibility, threat or occurrence of a change in control;

provides for continuity of executive management and key employees in the event of an actual or threatened change in control.

Retirement and otherOther Benefits

 

401(k) savings plan, Supplemental Plan, basic life and disability insurance and limited perquisites, as for all of our employees.

 

Represents market practice and competitive factors;

the Supplemental Plan is a broad-based programsprogram for all employees who exceed the federal 401(k) compensation limit.

Each of these elements is also addressed separately below. In determining compensation for executive officers, the compensation committee considers all elements of an executive officer’s total compensation package in comparison to current market practices, including change in control arrangements,and ability to participate in savings plans and other benefits. On at least an annual basis, the compensation committee considers the base salary, annual cash bonus, and long-term equity incentive elements, and balance among each of these elements, of each executive officer’s overall compensation.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    28


The receipt and retention by executive officers of certain elements of compensation, such as cash bonuses and equity-based compensation, are subject to our company’s Code of Business Conduct, and the terms and conditions of relevant program, plan, and grant and award agreements, all of which include provisions that provide that the company may rescind or recover(“clawbackclawback”)”) from an executive officer, including post-separation of service, cash bonus and/or equity-based incentives paid or awarded to such executive officer immediately under certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, actions by the executiveindividual constituting Cause, as determined by the company in its discretion and as otherwise enforceable under local law and violation of the Cabot Microelectronics Corporationour Code of Business Conduct, including those provisions related to financial reporting (e.g., in the event of a restatement caused by certain factors). and as may be required by law. In the event of any such rescission or right of recovery, the individual must repay the amount in question to the company, and the company shall be entitled toset-off against such amount any amount owed to the individual by the company.company, including unvested equity awards.

Base Salaries.    The compensation committee regularly reviews each executive officer’s base salary. Base salaries for executive officers are initially determined by evaluating the executive officers’ levels of responsibility, prior experience, breadth of knowledge, internal equity issues and external compensation practices, with particular reference to the comparison group of companies. Increases to base salaries are driven primarily by performance and current market practices, and are evaluated by the compensation committee based on sustained levels of contribution to the company in the context of our performance-based management process. In the past depending on the level of performance of the company and each executive officer,several years, this generally hadhas meant base salaries inaround the 50th to 75th percentile of the salary ranges of similarly positioned executive officers in the comparison group of companies, but in the past few years generally has meant closer to the 50th percentile of the range.group. The factors the compensation committee considers in determining base salary levels are not assigned specific weights. Rather, the compensation committee reviews all of the factors and makes base pay determinations that reflect the compensation committee’s analysis of the aggregate impact of these factors.

Current market practices, as represented by a comparison to executive officer base salaries in the comparison group of companies continued to serve as the primary reference for the compensation committee with respect to deciding upon any changes to base salary for both fiscal year 20142017 (effective as of January 1, 2014)2017), and fiscal year 20152018 (effective as of January 1, 2015)2018), similar to fiscal year 20132016 (effective as of January 1, 2013)2016). Over this period, the comparative data likely reflect the effects of macroeconomic and industry factors, set in the context of individual company performance, since,performance.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    29


According to methodology consistent with the above, the resulting base salaries for example,2017 and 2018 for fiscal year 2015, our named executive officers’ salaries remained competitive within our peer group and thereforeeach of the named executive officers including are:

Name 

2017 Base Salary  

(Effective  

January 1, 2017)  

 

Increase Over FY 2016

and Reasoning

 

2018 Base Salary  

(Effective  
January 1, 2018)  

 

Increase Over FY 2017  

and Reasoning  

 

David H. Li

 

 

 

$630,000

 

 

 

5%; below the 50th percentile as compared to market comparables,

 

and individual and company performance

 

 

$650,000

 

 

 

3%; in consideration of market comparables, and individual and company performance

 

 

William S. Johnson

 

 

 

$396,300

 

 

 

3%; in consideration of market comparables and individual and company performance

 

 

 

$198,150*

 

 

 

 

 

H. Carol Bernstein

 

 

 

$354,700

 

 

 

5%; in consideration of market comparables and individual and company performance

 

 

 

$365,300

 

 

 

3%; in consideration of market comparables, and individual and company performance

 

 

Ananth Naman

 

 

 

$362,000

 

 

 

3%; in consideration of market comparables and individual and company performance

 

 

 

$372,900

 

 

 

3%; in consideration of market comparables, and individual and company performance

 

 

Daniel D. Woodland

 

 

 

$325,000

 

 

 

14.8%; in consideration of recent transition fromnon-executive officer to executive officer role market comparables, individual and company performance

 

 

 

$380,000

 

 

 

16.9%; in consideration of recent expansion of responsibilities, market comparables, and individual and company performance

 

*Mr. Noglows, received no increases to their base salaries, with the exception of Dr. Naman, who received 3.4%, in the context of solid performance for fiscal year 2014, whereas for fiscal year 2014, to remain competitive with our peer group, and as a reflection of certain increased responsibilities for Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weisman, the named executive officers receivedJohnson’s new base salary increases that averaged approximately 6.3%, in the context of the company’s strong performance for fiscal year 2013, and for fiscal year 2013, to remain competitive within our peer group, the named executive officers received only modest increases of 2.5% or less, or no increases, and Mr. Noglows received an increase of 4.5%, in the context of solid performance for fiscal year 2012. As described above, according to consistent methodology, for fiscal year 2015, upon review of the competitiveness of salaries within the peer group and upon review of each named executive officer’s performance in the context of the company’s performance for fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee awarded no base salary increase to Mr. Noglows, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman, or Mr. Li; the compensation committee awarded Dr. Naman an increase of 3.4%. As described above,is effective January 1, 2015,31, 2018 following his transition from the role of Chief Financial Officer to reflect Mr. Noglows’ new positionSenior Advisor through his retirement date of continuing solely as our Executive Chairman, and Mr. Li’s promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee decreased Mr. Noglows’ baseJanuary 5, 2019.

salary and increased Mr. Li’s base salary, based on competitive benchmarks. The resulting base salaries for 2015, 2014, and 2013 are as follows:

Name 2015 Base Salary  2014 Base Salary  2013 Base Salary 

William P. Noglows

 $500,000   $640,000   $606,000  

William S. Johnson

 $370,000   $370,000   $353,000  

Adam F. Weisman

 $360,000   $360,000   $339,300  

Ananth Naman

 $341,200   $330,000   $300,000  

David H. Li

 $550,000   $336,000   $320,000  

Annual Cash Bonuses.    All of the company’s employees are eligible to participate in the company’s annual cash bonus program, which is called our Annualthe Short-Term Incentive Program and(“STIP”). This program is administered pursuant to our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, with executive officer, including named executive officer, bonuses, if any, determined by the compensation committee. As with all employees, executive officers’ opportunities to earn annual cash bonuses correspond to the degree to which our company achieves the annually-established goals. The compensation committee believes that an annual cash bonus program allows us to communicate specific goals that are of primary importance during such year and motivates executive officers to achieve these goals.

Performance-Based Management Program and Company Performance Objectives: At the beginning of each fiscal year, the compensation committee and board of directors establish specific performance goals for the company in accordance with our performance-based management process. These objectives are set to reflect the key elements of our annual plan and budget, and provide a common platform for our initiatives for the year.year, which are set within the context of our focus on achievement of our longer-term strategic initiatives. Throughout the

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    30


year, our senior management periodically reviews the company’s progress in achieving these goals with our board of directors and compensation committee. In November 2013,2016, the board of directors and compensation committee approved our Fiscal Year 20142017 Company Performance Objectives, which also served as our Performance Goals for the purposes of our Annual Incentive Program.STIP. As in prior years, the fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Program2017 STIP Performance Goals were chosen to encourage a particular and enhanced focus on certain aspects of our company’s performance, business strategy and objectives for all of our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers, and for which all of our executive officers collectively have responsibility for influencing and driving.

The board of directors and compensation committee selected as our Fiscal Year 20142017 Company Performance Objectives and Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Performance Goals financial measures that are consistent with those used by the investment community to evaluate the performance of our company, and which would be appropriate goals by which to incent the ongoing balanced performance of the company and its employees, including its executive officers, across all of its operational units, within the soft industry environment we facedanticipated in early fiscal year 2014.2017. The Fiscal Year 20142017 Company Performance Objectives and Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Performance Goals with corresponding Weighting, Measures for evaluating attainment of such, and corresponding Performance Targets were as follows:

Fiscal Year 2014 Company Performance Objectives:

Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Incentive Program Performance Goals (with corresponding Weighting, Measures, and Performance Targets), followed by (Fiscal Year 2014 Achievement):

 

Revenue (25%) (Revenue, $439 million, threshold of $418 million) ($424.7 million);LOGO

 

Gross Margin (30%) (Gross Profit, as a percentage of revenue, 49.5%, threshold of 47.5%) (47.8%);

Earnings Per Share (30%) (Earnings Per Share, $2.31, threshold of $1.73) ($2.04); and

Achievement of Certain Business Opportunities (15%) (Achievement of Number of Certain Business Opportunities, 100%) (122%).

Performance Goals, Bonus Pool and Bonus Calculation: As in prior years, in fiscal year 2014,2017, level of achievement of the noted fourthree Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Incentive Program2017 STIP Performance Goals served as the mechanism by which the company determined the amount of funding for our Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Bonus Pool, (“AIP Bonus Pool”), which is approved by the compensation committee for all employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers.

To determine the funding of the AIPSTIP Bonus Pool, the performance goals generally are weighted, based on their relative importance to achieving the company’s overall goals. Then, for each performance goal, “threshold”, “target” and “stretch” metrics, or levels, of performance are established. Because each year our performance goals are set to reflect the key objectives of our annual plan and budget, the “threshold”, “target” and “stretch” metrics for each goal are designed to reflect increasing levels of difficulty improvement, and motivation in achieving each level.level; even the “threshold” level requires demonstrated significant achievement against objectives. For fiscal year 2014, consideration was given to the generally improved industry conditions in the context of some global economic uncertainty, and at the time continuation of the seasonal slowdown in the semiconductor industry from the end of2017, as for fiscal year 2013, in setting2016, the company set challenging Performance Targets for the Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Performance Goals.Goals to encourage focus on continuing to achieve our strategic initiatives, regardless of any difficult industry or macroeconomic conditions. As part of our senior management’s periodic review throughout the year of our

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    31


progress in meeting our Company Performance Objectives and Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Performance Goals with the compensation committee and board of directors, performance is discussed against a particular goal’s “threshold”, “target” and “stretch” levels.

The “threshold” level of performance for a particular performance goal represents the lowest level of performance for which any bonus would be earned on that goal. The “stretch” level of performance represents the level for which the maximum bonus would be earned for that particular goal, and the “target” represents the target level of performance. The actual bonus, if any, attributable to each performance goal is calculated based on the actual performance compared to these “threshold”, “target” and “stretch” performance levels, and these are added together for all the performance goals to determine the funding of the AIPSTIP Bonus Pool. An additional amount is added to the STIP Bonus Pool in respect of the portion of annual bonus for employees, other than executive officers, that is related to their performance against their individual performance goals, rather than overall company goals. In turn, the AIPSTIP Bonus Pool is allocated for payment of bonuses to employees and executive officers, including our named executive officers. For fiscal year 2014,2017, the bonus for a particular employee or executive officer was calculated by:as follows:

i)multiplying the salary of the employee or executive officer by the bonus target level established for the particular role or level of the employee or executive officer (expressed as a percentage of the individual’s base salary, and set according to market pay practices), as described in greater detail for executive officers below;

ii)multiplied by a factor related to the company’s overall achievement of the Annual Incentive Program Performance Goals (expressed as a percentage of the “target” level of performance); and

iii)multiplying this product by a factor that corresponds to an assessment of the individual performance of the employee or executive officer relative to the individual’s own performance objectives. The compensation committee and board of directors approved and set the individual performance factor multiplier for each participant at the maximum level of 2.0, and the compensation committee retained discretion to reduce this amount.LOGO

In addition, in certain years, although not for fiscal year 2017, in assessing the company’s overall performance and calculating the funding of the AIPSTIP Bonus Pool for all of our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers, the compensation committee also considersmay consider certain additional factors, such as, for example, acquisition activity or the impact of global or other events beyond the company’s control, that may have affected our company’s achievement of certain of the Performance Goals that the committee considered important in evaluating the company’s performance for the particular fiscal year, but that were not able to be known to the company at the time the year’s Annual Incentive ProgramSTIP Performance Goals and related metrics were established.

Individual Executive Officer Bonus Target Levels and Cash Bonus Earned: As described above, actual payouts for cash bonus awards are determined by the level of performance of our company, which as described above while overall solid, generally did not meet the target level of performance goals for fiscal year 2014, and the individual performance of each employee, including each named executive officer and other executive officers, and may be higher or lower than the established individual’s bonus target level depending upon performance relative to the pre-established goals. The compensation committee, in consultation with its outsideindependent compensation consultant, has established a bonus award target for each executive officer by evaluating factors such as external pay practices, with particular reference to the comparison group of companies (as described above, bonus award targets are established for each of our employees based on an individual’s role or level). In this regard, for fiscal year 2014,2017, the compensation committee retained the bonus award target for each named executive officer at the same level as each individual’s bonus award target for fiscal year 2013, other than2016. As described above, actual payouts for Mr. Johnsoncash bonus awards to executive officers are determined by the level of performance of our company, which was strong and Mr. Weisman, whose responsibilities were expanded duringan improvement over fiscal year 20132016, with performance for fiscal year 2017 exceeding the stretch level for two out of three performance goals and as a resultexceeding the target level for one performance goal. The compensation committee increased theirdetermined that overall performance against the fiscal year 2017 STIP Performance Goals was achieved at approximately 176% of target. Thus, for fiscal year 2017, the actual payouts for cash bonus targets from 65%awards for all executive officers, including the named executive officers, were significantly greater than the established bonus target level payouts for each

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    32


individual, given the stronger performance relative to 75%.thepre-established goals. The bonus award targets and actual amounts earned for our named executive officers for fiscal year 20142017 were as follows:

 

Name  Bonus Target (as % 
of Base Salary)
   Bonus Target ($)    Actual Bonus Earned* ($)  

William P. Noglows

  100 $640,000   $359,300  

William S. Johnson

    75 $277,500   $155,800  

Adam F. Weisman

    75 $270,000   $142,700  

Ananth Naman

    55 $181,500   $101,900  

David H. Li

    55 $184,800   $103,700  

Name 

Fiscal Year 2017

Bonus Target (as %
of Base Salary)

  Fiscal Year 2017
Bonus Target ($)
  

Fiscal Year 2017

Actual Bonus Earned* ($)

 

 

David H. Li

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$630,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,110,690    

 

 

 

 

 

William S. Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

 

75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$297,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   524,100    

 

 

 

 

 

H. Carol Bernstein

 

 

 

 

 

 

55%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$195,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   343,900    

 

 

 

 

 

Ananth Naman

 

 

 

 

 

 

55%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$199,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   351,100    

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel D. Woodland

 

 

 

 

 

 

55%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$178,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   315,100    

 

 

 

 

 

*In assessing our company’s and executive officers’ achievement of the noted Performance Goals for purposes of the multiplier described above, the compensation committee concluded that a factor of approximately 54.5% percent176% had been achieved and the bonus pool was funded accordingly.accordingly, with allocation to the executive officers according to this percentage achievement. In assessing each named executive officer’s individual performance for fiscal year 2014,2017, and for purposes of the multiplier described above, the compensation committee, pursuant to its ability to exercise negative discretion, ultimately decided upon factors ranging from approximately 0.97a factor of 1.0 for each named executive officer that recognized the collective contributions of the executive officers to 1.03.the company’s success for the year.

As discussed above, cash bonuses awarded to our executive officers are subject to rescission and recovery (“clawbackclawback”) by the company in certain circumstances.

Fiscal Year 20152018 STIP, Performance Management ProgramGoals and Performance GoalsBonus Targets: In November 2014,2017, the compensation committee and board of directors set our Fiscal Year 2015 Annual Incentive Programfiscal year 2018 STIP Performance Goals, generally using the process described above. Any amounts earned under this program will be paid under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The performance goalsPerformance Goals approved for Fiscal Year 2015fiscal year 2018 are: financial goals that include revenue, gross margin,profit, expressed as a percentage of revenue, and operating income, and earnings per share, andexpressed as a nonfinancial goal involving achievementpercentage of identified business opportunities.revenue. In addition, the compensation committee and board of directors approved and set the individual performance factor multiplier for each participant at the maximum level of 2.0, and the compensation committee retained discretion to reduce this amount. In consideration of competitive market data, the compensation committee set Ms. Bernstein’s and Dr. Woodland’s bonus targets for fiscal year 2018 at 60% and 65%, respectively, of base salary, and the bonus targets for Mr. Li and Dr. Naman remained unchanged. All of our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers, are eligible to participate in the STIP.

Long-Term Equity Incentives.    Long-term equity incentives are provided to our named executive officers and other executive officers pursuant to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan following our stockholders’ approval of the plan at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan prior to such time.Plan. All of the company’s employees are eligible to participate in the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, (and were eligible to participate in the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan), with any and all awards to executive officers, including named executive officers, pursuant to it determined by the compensation committee. The compensation committee believes that equity-based compensation is an essential element in our overall compensation scheme. Equity-based compensation is emphasized in the design of our executive officer compensation program because it involvesat-risk components of compensation that directly link our executive officers’ interests with those of our

stockholders. The compensation committee, in consultation with its outsideindependent compensation consultant, evaluates the balance of equity-based compensation with the base salary and cash bonus elements of cash compensation by considering factors such as external compensation practices, with particular reference to the comparison group of companies, the ability to achieve a desired balance between cash and equity-based compensation, and the financial impact to our company of providing various kinds and amounts of equity-based compensation to our employees, including our executive officers.

Timing of Grants: Initial or “new-hire” options and restricted stock“new-hire” equity grants may be awarded to employees, including our executive officers, when they join the company. Thereafter, options and restricted stockequity grants may be awarded to employees, including each executive officer, annually and from time to time based on performance, or certain other factors, such as promotion or retention awards. To enhance retention, options and restricted stockequity grants awarded to executive officers, as with awards

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    33


to all other employees, are subject to vesting restrictions that generally lapse over a four-year period. Stock optionAll grants of equity-based compensation to executive officers, whether “new hire”, occasional, or pursuant to our annual incentive program, may only be made upon specific approval by the compensation committee, as is the case with all other forms of equity-based compensation, such as restricted stock awards, and non-equity-based compensation for executive officers.committee. Our stock option grant practice consistently has been that the exercise price for all of our stock option grants, including those to our executive officers, is the fair market value, as represented by the closing price on NASDAQ, of our stock on the stock optionapplicable grant date, as approved by the compensation committee. For “new hire” stock option grants, the grant date is the first day of employment for the grant recipient; for stock option grants made pursuant to our annual grant program or at other times in particular circumstances, the latter of which has not occurred for any of our executive officers while serving as an executive officer with the exception of the stock option grant awarded by the compensation committee to David Li as of January 2, 2015, the first date on which the stock market is open following the January 1, 2015 effective date of his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer, as defined in his employment letter described above and below, the grant date is the date of approval by the compensation committee or a subsequent date set by the committee in its approval. For our annual award program, our practice for the annual award cycle over the past ten years has been that the one grant date for grants made to all employees, including all of our executive officers, occurs within approximately one to two weeks following the compensation committee’s meeting (usually late November) to consider and decide upon performance and compensation-related matters for our employees, including specific evaluations and decisions regarding each of our executive officers, such as base salary increases, annual cash bonuses, and equity-based incentive awards following the close of our fiscal year on September 30. It is our practice to set a stock option’s grant date only for a date certain on or subsequent to the date the grant is approved, and it is not our practice to set a stock option’s grant date as a date prior to the date of approval for a grantby the compensation committee (i.e., “backdating”). In addition, it iswe do not our practice to make stock option grants while we are in possession, or in coordination with the release, of materialnon-public information regarding our company. To our knowledge, we have followed our stock option grant practices throughout our history as a publicly-traded company. While we do not have any current plans to change our stock option grant practices, circumstances may arise such that we might decide it is in the best interests of our business to do so in the future.

Allocation Among AwardsAward Types: As permitted by the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and prior thereto, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan,through fiscal year 2017, our compensation committee awards a blend of has awardednon-qualified stock option grantsoptions and restricted stock awards (restricted stock units for our non-United States employees) to employees selected to receive awards, including the named executive officers and other executive officers;officers. As described above, beginning in fiscal year 2018 with the December 2017 long-term incentive awards, generally had beenour executive officers now also receive performance share units. In determining the allocation among award types for a particular fiscal year, our compensation committee considers a number of factors, including the overall number of units to be awarded pursuant to our annual equity incentive award program to all employees. The allocation of value for the fiscal year 2017 long-term equity incentive awards made according to approximately a three-to-one ratioour named executive officers (other than Mr. Li) was 30% in the form ofnon-qualified stock options granted toand 70% in the form of time-based restricted stock awarded, but as of December 2013 (fiscal year 2014), the ratio was adjusted to approximately 2.7-to-one to allocate approximately equal value to non-qualified stock options granted and restricted stock awardedunits, to reflect current market practices. As previously disclosed, upon the advice of the independent compensation consultant to the compensation committee, the compensation committee decided to award Mr. Li as chief executive officer of our company fiscal year 2017 long-term equity incentive awards with a value equally split betweennon-qualified stock options (50%) and time-based restricted stock units (50%). The breakdown of the allocation of long-term equity incentive awards, by award type, made to our named executive officers with respect to fiscal year 2017 is set forth in the charts below.

FY17 CEO EQUITY AWARD

ALLOCATION

FY17 OTHER NEO EQUITY AWARD

ALLOCATION

LOGOLOGO

Our compensation committee believes that this mix of awards competitively balances the types of equity incentives being awarded to our employees, and also appropriately addresses the financial impact of the expensing of equity-based compensation required pursuant to an accounting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (ASC 718 SFAS 123R)718). We have provided

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    34


As previously disclosed, for our fiscal year 2018 awards in December 2017, the compensation committee added a combination of restricted stock and stock optionperformance-based award component to the equity incentive compensation awards for the annual equity incentive award program grants to our employees,executive officers, including our named executive officers, sincein the form of performance share units. The performance share units will vest based on the company’s achievement of certain performance metrics (average annual revenue growth and cumulative earnings per share, with potential adjustment based on the total shareholder return (“TSR”) achieved by our company relative to the TSR of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index) over the three-year performance period ending September 30, 2020, generally subject to continued employment through the end of the performance period. We believe that these awards will help us to even more directly align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders and will further enhance the link between pay and performance. The compensation committee also approvednon-qualified stock option and time-based restricted stock unit awards to the company’s named executive officers with terms and conditions that are generally consistent with the awards granted in prior years. All equity awards granted in fiscal year 2007. For2018 provide for accelerated vesting, either in full or on a prorated basis, upon the annualrecipient’s “retirement,” defined as the termination of the recipient’s employment following the attainment of a combination of age and years of service of at least 70, with a minimum of 55 years of age, or upon an involuntary termination of employment due to a position elimination or reorganization of the company. The breakdown of the allocation of value for the fiscal year 2018 long-term equity incentive programawards made to our named executive officers was 40% in the form of performance share units (50% for fiscal year 2015 (December 2014)Mr. Li), 30% in the compensation committee decided to awardform ofnon-qualified stock options (25% for Mr. Noglows onlyLi), and 30% in the form of time-based restricted stock rather than

units (25% for Mr. Li). This allocation among award types is set forth in the charts below.

a blend of a non-qualified stock option grant and a restricted stock award. For more information regarding these awards generally, see Footnotes no. 1 and 2 to the 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

FY18 CEO EQUITY AWARD

ALLOCATION

LOGO

FY18 OTHER NEO EQUITY AWARD

ALLOCATION

LOGO

Size of Awards: When determining awards for individual executive officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, (and the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan prior to our stockholders’ approval of the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan), the compensation committee primarily considers compensation practices and equity values awarded by the comparison group of companies, as well as the executive officer’s level of current and potential future responsibility, and to some extentalso considers performance in the prior year.year and the underlying economic value associated with equity incentive awards. In determining award sizes, the compensation committee does not assign specific weights to these factors. Rather, the factors are evaluated on an aggregate basis. The compensation committee also considers the overall number of units to be awarded pursuant to our annual equity incentive award program to all employees with respect to consideration of our annual equity award run rate. In addition, the compensation committee considers the underlying economic value associated with equity incentive awards, and may decide to increase or decrease the award “units” to be awarded in an attempt to deliver a relatively consistent dollar value of awards from year to year, or to deliver a dollar value aligned within the target range for comparable benchmark positions. For example, for our fiscal year 2015 annual equity incentive awards, which occurred onOn December 3, 2014,5, 2016, the compensation committee, upon the advice of its independent compensation consultant, considered all of these factors in general decreased the overall number of “units” to be awarded todeciding our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers, receiving such awards, relative to the fiscal year 2014 awards generally in order to reflect a dollar value of award delivered based upon the average near term price of our stock more consistent with the value delivered in fiscal year 2014, and in addition, with values somewhat reduced to be more aligned with the lower end of the target range for comparable benchmark positions. These fiscal year 20152017 annual equity incentive awards, which occurred on December 3, 2014,for our named executive officers are shown in the following table:

 

Name Fiscal Year 2015
 Non-Qualified Stock 
Option Grant (#)
  Fiscal Year 2015
 Restricted Stock Award (#) 
  

 

Fiscal Year 2017   

Non-Qualified Stock   

Option Grant (#)   

 

  

Fiscal Year 2017

Restricted Stock Unit Award (#)

 

 

William P. Noglows

      44,400  

David H. Li

 79,100            19,000               

William S. Johnson

  18,500    7,100   17,300            9,700               

Adam F. Weisman

  15,100    5,800  

H. Carol Bernstein

 15,800            8,900               

Ananth Naman

  16,000    6,100   14,600            8,200               

David H. Li

  13,500    5,200  

Daniel D. Woodland

 15,800            8,900               

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    35


The compensation committee considered all of the same factors described above in deciding our fiscal year 2018 annual equity incentive awards on December 5, 2017, which for our named executive officers are shown in the following table:

Name

 

 

 

Fiscal Year 2018

Non-Qualified Stock

Option Grant (#)

 

  

Fiscal Year 2018

Restricted Stock Unit Award (#)

 

  

 

Fiscal Year 2018

Target Performance Share Unit

Award (#)

 

 

David H. Li

  22,054          6,616                 13,232               

William S. Johnson

  —          —                 —               

H. Carol Bernstein

  7,800          2,300                 3,100               

Ananth Naman

  7,200          2,200                 2,900               

Daniel D. Woodland

  9,600          2,900                 3,800               

In general, the compensation committee has not considered any actual amounts that may have been realized from prior equity-based compensation awards in awarding subsequent equity-based compensation, or other elements of compensation. However, in considering awards under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (and the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan prior to our stockholders’ approval of the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan) to our employees, including executive officers, the compensation committee does consider whether equity-based awards that previously may have been made to them continue to fulfill the purposes of motivation and retention.

Our executive officers are also eligible to participate in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program. See “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Executive Officer Deposit Share Program,” below. While all of our executive officers have meaningful equity ownership in our company through participation in various equity-based programs such as the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, and our annual equity incentive award program, we do not currently have equity-ownership requirements or guidelines for our executive officers.

Clawback Policy; Anti-Hedging or Anti-Pledging Policy:As discussed above, equity-based compensation awarded to our executive officers is subject to rescission and recovery (“clawbackclawback”) by the company in certain circumstances.In addition, all equity-based compensation is subject to all of the terms of our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and its predecessor, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable, the respective grant and award agreements for particular grants and awards, our Code of Business Conduct, our Insider Trading andNon-Disclosure

and Non-Disclosure Policy, including Trading Guidelines for Directors, Executive Officers and Other Key Employees, and our Reporting Requirements and Trading Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers Under Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act and Rule 144 Under the Securities Act of 1933; as applicable, noted policies and procedures apply to any and all equity in our company held by our executive officers. For example, our executive officers, as well as our directors and designated other key employees, observe various requirements, such as those related to quarterly trading and other “blackout” periods, and affirmativepre-clearance of any transactions in our company’s securities.Our executive officers and directors are prohibited from and do not hedge or pledge equity in our company.

Change in Control Severance Protection Benefits.    The terms and conditions of the change in control severance protection agreements with our named executive officers and the employment agreementletter with Mr. NoglowsLi are described in more detail in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below. The board of directors and compensation committee originally determined the terms and conditions of the change in control severance protection agreements, including the severance benefit payable, and the triggering events for the payment of such severance benefit, pursuant to such agreement, in consultation with their outsideindependent compensation consultant and our financial and other advisors, and considered external practices at similarly situated companies regarding change in control arrangements. The board of directors and compensation committee also review the costs and benefits of the change in control severance protection agreements periodically. As a result of the most recent review, which occurred in 2014,2016, the board of directors and compensation committee, with advice from an independent outside compensation consultant regarding market practices, determined that the cost to the company and the competitivenessdesign of such agreements remain reasonableremains competitive and appropriate.reasonable. The agreements are described in more detail in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below.

Retirement and Other Benefits.We have adopted various employee benefit plans and arrangements for the purpose of providing employee benefits to our employees, including our executive officers. In general, the same terms apply to all of our employees, including our executive officers. These plans and arrangements include

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    36


our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 401(k) Plan, the Supplemental Plan, and the Cabot Microelectronics Health and Welfare Benefit Plan.

CEO Compensation

When Mr. Noglows joined our company in fiscal year 2004, the compensation committee, in consultation with outside advisors hired by the committee, used the executive compensation practices described above to determine the terms of Mr. Noglows’ employment offer and initial compensation, comprised of base salary, annual cash bonus and equity-based compensation elements, which are part of Mr. Noglows’ employment agreement with our company, as described in greater detail in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below. As part of the agreement and his joining the company, Mr. Noglows also entered into a change-in-control severance protection agreement and became eligible for the reimbursement of certain relocation and other expenses, all of which are described in greater detail in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below.

Upon completion of fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee, in consultation with the compensation committee’s outside compensation consultant, used the executive compensation practices described above, including the performance goals established by the committee, to determine Mr. Noglows’ compensation, composed of a cash bonus for fiscal year 2014, and a restricted stock award as part of the annual equity incentive award cycle for which all employees were eligible. In addition, in setting both the cash-based and equity-based elements of Mr. Noglows’ compensation, the compensation committee made an overall assessment of Mr. Noglows’ leadership in achieving the company’s long-term and short-term strategic, operational and business goals. This included a favorable review of his overall performance in leading the company during yet another overall successful fiscal year, including with regard to its solid financial results and continued successful execution of the company’s long-term strategic initiatives, such as ongoing greater collaboration with technology leading customers, the introduction of new generations of leading edge technology to refresh various of the company’s product areas, and enhancements to the company’s traditionally-strong supply chain. The compensation committee also considered Mr. Noglows’ compensation with respect to chief executive officers

among the comparison group of companies, as well as equitable and consistent treatment compared to our other executive officers. In addition to these factors, Mr. Noglows’ cash bonus award for fiscal year 2014 reflected the company’s performance against certain financial and other objectives in fiscal year 2014, as described in greater detail above, and the aspects of the overall pre-established goals for fiscal year 2014 that may have been met or exceeded at threshold, target or stretch levels, as assessed by the compensation committee, using its discretion. Based upon all of these criteria, which included the compensation committee’s assessment of the company’s and Mr. Noglows’ performance in various respects in fiscal year 2014 as compared with fiscal year 2013, the compensation committee awarded Mr. Noglows $359,300 as a cash bonus for fiscal year 2014. Mr. Noglows’ fiscal year 2014 cash bonus of $359,300, together with his $631,500 base salary paid during fiscal year 2014, resulted in total cash compensation of salary and cash bonus to Mr. Noglows for fiscal year 2014 of $990,800; this was $358,700 less than the $1,349,500 in total cash compensation that Mr. Noglows received for fiscal year 2013, and reflects the weaker performance of the company against goals in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013. In addition, as noted above and as reported in Footnotes 1 and 2 to the 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table that follows, on December 3, 2014, the compensation committee awarded Mr. Noglows equity-based compensation in the form of 44,400 shares of restricted stock with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on NASDAQ on the award date of $46.45 per share that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years. Aside from the number of restricted stock awarded, the terms and conditions of this restricted stock award are the same as those for awards made to our other employees, including those that provide that restricted stock on which restrictions have not lapsed at the time of termination of employment are forfeited, except that pursuant to the employment agreement related to the Chief Executive Officer transition, by which Mr. Noglows will continue to serve only as our Executive Chairman, all unvested restricted shares held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at the end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us. Because this equity award was made after the completion of fiscal year 2014, it is reported in the referenced footnote and not specifically reported in the compensation tables that follow.

As noted above, the compensation committee and the board of directors reviews on a periodic basis the hypothetical costs to the company of Mr. Noglows’ change-in-control severance protection agreement, and those of the company’s other executive officers and key employees who have such agreements.

As described in greater detail above and below, effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Li became our President and Chief Executive Officer succeeding Mr. Noglows in these roles, and a member of our board of directors, and as of such date Mr. Noglows has continued to serve aseffective January 1, 2015, the Executive Chairman of our board of directors. The compensation committee, in consultation with the committee’s independent compensation consultant usedat the time, W.T. Haigh, considered the executive compensation practices described above to determine the terms of Mr. Li’s initial compensation, comprised of base salary, annual cash bonus and equity-based compensation elements, along with other terms, which are part of Mr. Li’s employment letter agreement with our company, as described in greater detail above and in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below. Similarly,company.

Upon completion of fiscal year 2017, the compensation committee, in consultation with the compensation committee’s current independent compensation consultant, determinedMeridian, considered the termsexecutive compensation practices described above, including the performance goals established by the committee, to determine Mr. Li’s total compensation, composed of Mr. Noglows’ compensation for continued service as Executive Chairman, comprised ofan annual base salary, an annual cash bonus for fiscal year 2017, and other terms,for fiscal year 2018 according to the annual equity incentive award cycle for which are partall employees were eligible, anon-qualified stock option grant, performance-share unit award, and restricted stock unit award. In addition, in setting both the cash-based and equity-based elements of Mr. Li’s compensation, the compensation committee made an overall assessment of Mr. Li’s leadership in achieving the company’s long-term and short-term strategic, operational and business goals. This included a favorable review of his employment letter agreementperformance in leading the company during another successful fiscal year, including with regard to its strong financial results, with record revenue and earnings, as marked by Mr. Li’s continued successful execution of the company’s long-term strategic initiatives, as more fully described above. The compensation committee noted the company’s strong results for the fiscal year and commensurately strong performance against the performance goals that had been set for fiscal year 2017, as noted above. The compensation committee also considered Mr. Li’s compensation with respect to chief executive officers among the comparison group of companies, as well as equitable and consistent treatment compared to our company,other executive officers. In addition to these factors, as described in greater detail above, Mr. Li’s cash bonus award for fiscal year 2017 reflected the company’s performance against certain objectives in fiscal year 2017, and the aspects of the overallpre-established goals for fiscal year 2017 that were exceeded at target or stretch levels, as assessed by the compensation committee, using its discretion.

Based upon all of this, the compensation committee awarded Mr. Li $1,110,690 as a cash bonus for fiscal year 2017. Mr. Li’s fiscal year 2017 cash bonus of $1,110,690, together with his $622,500 base salary paid during fiscal year 2017, resulted in total cash compensation to Mr. Li for fiscal year 2017 of $1,733,190, which was an increase from Mr. Li’s total cash compensation for fiscal year 2016 of $711,100, comprised of base salary paid in fiscal year 2016 of $587,500 and cash bonus for fiscal year 2016 of $123,600. Mr. Li’s cash and equity compensation breakdown for fiscal year 2017 and his target compensation allocation for fiscal year 2018 are set forth in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,”charts below.

FY17 CEO TOTAL COMPENSATION

ALLOCATION

LOGO

FY18 CEO TOTAL COMPENSATION

ALLOCATION

LOGO

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    37


In addition, as noted above and as reported in Footnotes 1 and 2 to the 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table that follows, on December 5, 2017, the compensation committee awarded Mr. Li equity-based compensation in the form of 22,054non-qualified stock options, 6,616 restricted stock units and 13,232 performance share units (at target). Aside from the number ofnon-qualified stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units awarded, the terms and conditions of these grants and awards are the same as those for grants and awards made to our other employees and executive officers, including provisions that unvested awards will be forfeited at the time of a termination of employment (other than in the event of a retirement or certain other terminations of employment). Because these equity awards were made after the completion of fiscal year 2017, they are reported in the referenced footnote and not specifically reported in the compensation tables that follow.

As noted above, the compensation committee and the board of directors review on a periodic basis the hypothetical costs to the company of Mr. Li’schange-in-control severance protection agreement, and those of the company’s other executive officers and key employees who have such agreements.

Regulatory and Other Factors

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).As one of the factors in its review of compensation matters, the compensation committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to our company and to our executive officers of various payments and benefits. We have designed our compensation program (including the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan) to grant certain awards that may be fully deductible for federal income tax purposes under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation payable to certain covered executive officers that a company may deduct in any one year. While the compensation committee considers the deductibility of long-term and annual incentive awards in structuring the company’s executive compensation program, the compensation committee also looks at other factors, as noted above, and will not necessarily limit executive compensation to that which is or may be deductible under Section 162(m). The deductibility of some types of compensation payments depends upon the timing of an executive officer’s vesting or exercise of previously granted rights. Furthermore, interpretations of

and changes in the tax laws, and other factors beyond the compensation committee’s control also affect the deductibility of compensation. For these and other reasons, the compensation committee will not necessarily limit executive compensation to that which is or may be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The compensation committee will consider various alternatives to preserving the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits to the extent consistent with its compensation objectives.

Our compensation program (including the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan) was designed to allow us to grant certain awards that were intended to be fully deductible for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the performance-based compensation exception to the limit on deductibility under Section 162(m). However, the Section 162(m) exception to the deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

Because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing Section 162(m)’s exception to the deduction limit for performance-based compensation, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exception from the Section 162(m) deduction limit in fact will satisfy the exception. Further, the compensation committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with the company’s business needs.

Other Factors.As described above, our compensation committee uses awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units in addition to grants ofnon-qualified stock options to, among other reasons, address the financial impact of the expensing of equity-based compensation required under FASB ASC Topic 718. In addition, the company has intended for itsnon-qualified deferred compensation plans and other plans, programs and agreements subject to the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to be in compliance with such requirements.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    38


COMPENSATION AND RISK

The company’s management, with a review by the audit committee and compensation committee of our board of directors and with support from the compensation committee’s outsideindependent compensation consultant, has assessed the risks associated with our compensation programs, policies and practices, and has determined that risks arising from them are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In making this determination, our management considered the various elements of our compensation programs, policies and practices, such as the: mix of base salary, annual cash bonuses and equity incentive program participations at various levels and throughout our company; balance between and among short-term and long-term compensation incentives in our programs; significant use of performance measures that are financial in nature such that they are readily measurable and verifiable, are regularly reviewed, and also are consistent with those that are publicly reported; use of performance measures that directly relate to the operations of our business such that they are readily measurable and verifiable, and are regularly reviewed; use of performance measures that relate to our business overall and avoid overdependence on one aspect of our business and its operations as opposed to another; multiple and cross-functional levels of review and verification prior to award approval; our system of internal controls and internal risk review and assessment processes; and, our general employment practices, policies and procedures.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report of the compensation committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference therein.

The compensation committee of the board of directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our company’s management, and based on the review and discussions, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and the company’s annual report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2017.

Submitted by Messrs. Reilly and Wild and Ms. Whitney, being all of the current members of the compensation committee,

RobertPaul J. BirgeneauReilly

H. Laurance Fuller, ChairmanSusan M. Whitney, Chair

Richard S. HillGeoffrey Wild

Edward J. Mooney

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    39

Bailing Xia


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables set forth certain compensation information for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and three other most highly compensated executive officers of the company (collectively, the “named executive officers”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2017. Information for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20132016 and September 30, 20122015 is also presented for executive officers who were named executive officers during those years.years, or who had previously been named executive officers.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)1

  

Stock Awards

($)2,3

  

Option Awards

($)3

  All Other
Compen-
sation ($)4
  Total Compen-
sation ($)
 

William P. Noglows

  2014    631,500    359,300    1,102,500    1,061,114    102,486    3,256,900  

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2013    599,500    750,000    816,000    902,865    86,422    3,154,787  
  2012    574,750    465,000    891,440    1,064,309    110,381    3,105,880  

William S. Johnson

  2014    365,750    155,800    387,309    363,137    39,002    1,310,998  

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

  2013    353,000    275,300    332,338    353,923    34,598    1,349,159  
  2012    351,750    184,200    365,022    420,886    37,610    1,359,468  

Adam F. Weisman5

  2014    354,825    142,700    317,520    306,544    37,826    1,159,415  

Executive Vice President,

Business Operations

  2013    337,650    256,700    257,856    285,305    38,800    1,176,311  
  2012    331,075    150,000    279,588    333,806    36,831    1,131,300  

Ananth Naman

  2014    322,500    101,900    291,060    278,032    34,671    1,028,163  

Vice President, Research

and Development

                            

David H. Li

  2014    332,000    103,700    285,151    249,917    399,154    1,369,922  

Vice President,

Asia Pacific Region

                            

Name and Principal

Position

 Year  

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock Awards

($)1

  

Option Awards

($)1

  

All Other
Compen-
sation

($)2

  

Total Compen-
sation

($)

 

David H. Li

  2017   622,500   1,110,690   1,145,130   1,291,648   370,488   4,540,456 

President and Chief Executive

  2016   587,500   123,600   932,140   768,564   603,139   3,014,943 

Officer

  2015   496,500   640,800   929,794   890,447   422,455   3,379,996 
         

William S. Johnson

  2017   393,425   524,100   584,619   291,403   32,716   1,826,263 

Former Executive Vice

President and

Chief Financial Officer3

  2016   381,100   59,500   355,908   300,186   41,886   1,138,580 
  2015   370,000   307,100   1,370,229   309,237   37,531   2,394,097 
        

H. Carol Bernstein

  2017   350,475   343,900   536,403   266,137   41,474   1,538,389 

Vice President, Secretary and

  2016   337,800   38,300   266,931   225,139   44,305   912,475 

General Counsel

  2015   337,800   231,600   222,960   210,615   40,628   1,043,603 
         

Ananth Naman

  2017   359,375   351,100   494,214   245,924   104,376   1,554,989 

Vice President, Asia Pacific,

and Chief

Technology Officer

  2016   348,925   39,800   254,220   209,124   36,935   889,004 
  2015   338,400   225,200   283,345   264,966   30,811   1,142,722 
        

Daniel D. Woodland

  2017   314,550   315,100   536,403   266,137   27,053   1,459,243 

Vice President and Chief

  2016   281,150   32,100   254,220   209,124   34,493   811,087 

Marketing and Operations Officer

 

        
                            

 

1 

Certain amounts in the “Bonus” column were used to purchase “deposit shares” of restricted stock under our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program after the end of the 2012 fiscal year on December 14, 2012, and after the end of the 2013 fiscal year on December 13, 2013. See footnote 2 below for more details.

2

Certain amounts in the Stock Awards column correspond to matching grants of “award shares” of restricted stock made pursuant to our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, which is described in more detail below. Under this program, our executive officers are entitled to voluntarily use all or a portion of their after-tax bonus compensation to purchase at fair market value shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These shares are retained on deposit with us until the third anniversary of the date of deposit (“deposit shares”), and our company matches the deposit with a restricted stock grant equal to 50% of the shares deposited by the participant (“award shares”). If the participant is employed by our company on the third anniversary of the deposit date and the deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date, the restrictions on the award shares will lapse. This column does not include deposit shares as these amounts were purchased by the participant after-tax from amounts that were already disclosed in the “Bonus” column. On December 14, 2012, Mr. Johnson participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program receiving 366 award shares on deposit under the program with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $34.06 per share. The restrictions on these award shares will lapse on December 14, 2015 if the executive is employed by us at that time and the corresponding deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date. Mr. Johnson purchased 733 deposit shares related to these award shares after-tax from amounts that are disclosed in the “Bonus” column above. On December 13, 2013, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Li participated in the

Executive Officer Deposit Share Program receiving 289 and 579 respective award shares on deposit under the program with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $43.11 per share. The restrictions on these award shares will lapse on December 13, 2016 if the executive is employed by us at that time and the corresponding deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Li purchased 579 and 1,159 respective deposit shares related to these award shares after-tax from amounts that are disclosed in the “Bonus” column above. These amounts do not include award share grants made pursuant to our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program to certain of our named executive officers after the end of fiscal year 2014. In December 2014, none of the named executive officers participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program.

3

The amounts in the column headed “Stock Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants in fiscal years 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 computed in accordance with ASC 718. For restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, the fair value is equal to the underlying value of the stock and is calculated using the closing price of our common stock on the grantaward date. The actual value realized by a named executive officer related to stock or stock unit awards will depend on the market value of our common stock on the date the stock is sold.

The amounts in the column headed “Option Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants in fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012 computed in accordance with ASC 718 (see Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014 for a description of the assumptions used in that computation). The actual value realized by a named executive officer related to option awards will depend on the difference between the market value of our common stock on the date the option is exercised and the exercise price of the option.

During fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, no awards to any of our named executive officers were modified or cancelled (forfeited).

 

The amounts in the column headed “Option Awards” represent the aggregate grant date fair value of grants in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 computed in accordance with ASC 718 (see Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year 2017 for a description of the assumptions used in that computation). The actual value realized by a named executive officer related to option awards will depend on the difference between the market value of our common stock on the date the option is exercised and the exercise price of the option.

During fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, no stock awards held by any of our named executive officers were modified or cancelled (forfeited).

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    40


42 

The information in the column headed “All Other Compensation” predominantly reflects amounts that by nature generally recur each year, such as benefit costs we contribute on behalf of our named executive officers in the same manner in which we contribute such costs for all of our employees. For example, the information in the column includes contributions (both “safe-harbor” and “matching”) made by us to ourtax-qualified savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) and accruals under ournon-qualified supplemental savings plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) according to the standard terms of each of these plans as applied to all of our employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers. Under the 401(k) Plan, we make an employer contribution on the employee’s behalf of 4% of each employee’s eligible compensation (up to the I.R.S. eligible compensation limit), regardless of whether the employee makes a contribution to the plan (“safe-harbor contribution”), and a matching contribution on the employee’s behalf of 100% of the first 4%, and 50% of the next 2%, that the employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan (“matching contribution”). With respect to the Supplemental Plan, which applies to all employees, including our named executive officers and other executive officers, at such time as they reach the I.R.S. eligible compensation limit, we continue to make the safe-harbor contribution of the equivalent of 4% of each employee’s eligible compensation (over the I.R.S. eligible compensation limit) to the Supplemental Plan on the employee’s behalf. Employees are presently not able to make contributions to the Supplemental Plan. For fiscal year 2014,2017, contributions as such to the 401(k) Plan and the Supplemental Plan on behalf of the named executive officers were made in the following amounts:

 

Name

  401(k) Plan   Supplemental Plan 

Mr. Noglows

  $23,400    $44,860  

Mr. Johnson

  $23,400    $15,242  

Mr. Weisman

  $23,426    $14,040  

Dr. Naman

  $24,275    $10,036  

Mr. Li

  $23,430    $11,384  

Name

 

  

  401(k) Plan  

 

   

 Supplemental Plan          

 

 

Mr. Li

   $24,300     $19,044 

Mr. Johnson

   $24,300     $7,317 

Ms. Bernstein

   $24,684     $4,444 

Dr. Naman

   $24,369     $5,112 

Dr. Woodland

   $24,814     $2,012 

Similarly, the amounts in the column headed “All Other Compensation” include amounts we provided on behalf of each of our named executive officers for basic life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment insurance coverage in fiscal year 2014,2017, which was provided on the same basis to all of our employees. There is no cash surrender value associated with this insurance coverage. The value paid for this coverage in fiscal year 20142017 attributable to each named executive officer is: $360.$252 for each of Mr. Li, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Bernstein, and Dr. Naman, and $227 for Dr. Woodland.

In addition, the figures in the column headed “All Other Compensation” for fiscal year 2017 reflect (i) businessfor Mr. Johnson, airline club membership fees for fiscal year 20142017 of $847, of which $397 is tax reimbursement; (ii) for Ms. Bernstein, a transportation allowance for fiscal year 2017 in the amount of $10,758,$8,000; and (iii) for Dr. Naman, airline club membership fees for fiscal year 2017 of $775, of which $3,658$325 is tax reimbursement, forreimbursement.

Prior to January 1, 2015, at which time Mr. Noglows; (ii)Li became our president and chief executive officer, Mr. Li was subject to an expatriate agreement with the payment of financial planning fees of $23,108, ofcompany, which $8,108 is tax reimbursement, for Mr. Noglows in fiscal year 2014, as perwas consistent with the terms of his original employment agreement; and (iii) the payment or reimbursement of fees related to Mr. Li’s service as an ongoing expatriate employeeagreements entered into with other employees of the company located in China. Mr. Li’sCompany who are not executive officers, pursuant to which certain expatriate fees include: a) cost of living differential of $92,667; b) income tax equalization of $136,549; c) housing-related expenses of $58,821; d) travel and transportation expenses of $75,193; and e) other miscellaneous expense of $750.were paid for or reimbursed to him. Following the close of fiscal year 2014 and as of January 1, 2015, Mr. Li ceased to be subject to anthis expatriate agreement, with the company, and instead ishas been covered by his employment agreementletter dated December 12, 2014, described abovebelow.

The amounts in the column headed “All Other Compensation” for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and below.2015 (as of January 1, 2015) for Mr. Li include certain fees covered by his employment letter, and for fiscal year 2015 (through December 31, 2014) for Mr. Li include certain expatriate fees (i.e., a cost of living differential, income tax equalization, housing-related expenses, travel and transportation expenses and other miscellaneous expenses). For fiscal year 2017, the amounts included housing-related expenses of $100,000, transportation expenses of $52,784 (paid in Chinese yuan and converted to U.S. dollars), tax equalization of $173,357, and tax preparation fees of $750.

The amounts in the column headed “All Other Compensation” for fiscal year 2017 for Dr. Naman include certain expatriate fees that were paid for or reimbursed to him pursuant to an expatriate agreement with the

 

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    41


company, which is consistent with the terms of expatriate agreements entered into with other employees of the company who are not executive officers. These amounts included dependent education expenses of $32,848, housing-related expenses of $23,314, transportation expenses of $8,156 (paid in Chinese yuan and converted to U.S. dollars), and culture and language training of $4,358.

In addition, the amounts in the column headed “All Other Compensation” for fiscal year 2017 also include what the company considers to benon-recurring business-related expenses for Ms. Bernstein and Dr. Naman, primarily related to spousal travel for one quarterly board meeting. Although the company views such spousal travel expenses as business-related, in light of certain I.R.S. practices, we have treated such expenses, which represent travel, food and lodging, tax and related expenses and which are included, as compensation to each affected individual. The specific amounts included for each individual are: $4,094 for Ms. Bernstein, of which $1,732 is tax reimbursement; and $2,791 for Dr. Naman, of which $1,181 is tax reimbursement.

53 

On January 5, 2015, we announced that Mr. Weisman has decided to resign from our company. The effective date of his resignationJohnson resigned as Executive Vice President Business Operations is December 31, 2014, and he will continue to perform transition responsibilities for us until he resigns his employmentChief Financial Officer on April 1, 2015 (“Resignation Date”). In connection with Mr. Weisman’s planned resignation, following the Resignation Date, and in consideration for a release of claims from him, his agreement to perform certain transition responsibilities, and his agreement to non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants, Mr. Weisman will receive the following: a cash severance payment of $360,000, which is equal to one year’s base salary; a cash payment of $135,000, which is a pro-rated amount representing his target bonus opportunity under our Annual Incentive Program, based on six months’ employment of fiscal year 2015; and the benefits of his Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement to the extent that a Change in Control as defined thereunder occurs within one year of the Resignation Date. Any unvested non-qualified stock options and restricted stock held by Mr. Weisman will be forfeited by him pursuant to the terms of the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and relevant grant and award agreements thereunder, as of the Resignation Date. His non-qualified stock options and restricted stock vested prior to the Resignation Date will remain subject to, and exercisable only per, the terms of the Plans and grant and award agreements thereunder. During his employment prior to the Resignation Date, Mr. Weisman will continue to receive his current salary and benefits, and will continue to comply with our Code of Business Conduct and other company policies and procedures. The consideration referenced above will remain subject to recovery by us if Mr. Weisman is found to have violated the Company’s Code of Business Conduct. The terms described will be set forth in a General Release, Waiver and Covenant Not to Sue, which will be executed by Mr. Weisman and us on the Resignation Date.

January  15, 2018.

Employment Agreements

On November 2, 2003, we entered into an employment agreementLetter with Mr. Noglows to become our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to this employment agreement, among other terms, we agreed to pay Mr. Noglows an annual base salary of $450,000 and a cash bonus for fiscal year 2004 that would not be less than $160,000, following the end of fiscal year 2004. Mr. Noglows’ agreement provided that following the close of each fiscal year, beginning with the end of fiscal year 2004, the compensation committee of the board of directors will meet to consider an increase in Mr. Noglows’ annual base salary in accordance with its normal practices, and the compensation committee has done so, as described in more detail in the compensation discussion and analysis section above. For 2012, the compensation committee set his salary at $580,000; for 2013, the compensation committee set his salary at $606,000; and for 2014, the compensation committee set his salary at $640,000. The employment agreement also provided the grant of an option to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $55.37, which, as a result of the leveraged recapitalization with a special cash dividend in March 2012, was proportionally adjusted to preserve the same fair value after payment of the special cash dividend as before, to an option to purchase 362,670 shares of our common stock with an exercise

Li

price of $38.17. Prior to the option’s expiration on November 3, 2013, Mr. Noglows exercised this option with respect to 4,682 shares during fiscal 2013, and 357,988 shares during fiscal 2014. We also agreed to provide Mr. Noglows with certain relocation and other reimbursements and to allow Mr. Noglows to utilize first-class air travel while he is employed by us. As described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on December 12, 2014, we entered into a new employment letter with Mr. Noglows effectiveand as of January 1, 2015, in connection with the Chief Executive Officer transition, whereby Mr. Noglows will cease to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer, but will remain as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which his base salary will be $500,000 and his target bonus under our company’s Annual Incentive Program will be 100% of his base salary. As also described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,previously disclosed, on December 12, 2014, we entered into an employment letter with Mr. Li in connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective as of January 1, 2015. Pursuant to the employment letter, Mr. Li’s initial base salary was set at $550,000 for 2015, and his target bonus under our Annual Incentive Program (now the Short-Term Incentive Program) was set at 100% of his base salary. Mr. Li also received anon-qualified stock option grant covering 38,500 shares of our common stock and an award of 14,700 restricted shares of our common stock, each with an award date of January 2, 2015. The option and restricted shares vest upon each anniversary in 25% increments over four years, subject to Mr. Li’s continued service, and the options have an exercise price equal to $46.82, the closing price of our common stock on January 2, 2015.

Other than in a situation involving a change of control of our company, which would be addressed by Mr. Li’s Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement that had been previously entered into in 2008, in the event that Mr. Li’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Li due to a material breach by us of the employment letter, (1) Mr. Li would be entitled to vesting of stock options and restricted shares held by him, including those described above, to the extent that such awards would have otherwise vested in accordance with their terms during the twelve-month period following the date of termination, (2) Mr. Li would continue to receive his base salary for twelve months and (3) to the extent applicable, we would maintain for 60 days the lease for Mr. Li’s Shanghai housing if such lease is then in effect. Receipt of severance and the accelerated vesting described above is subject to Mr. Li’s execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims against us.

In the event of a termination of Mr. Li’s employment in connection with a change of control of our company, Mr. Li’s rights are set forth in his existing change in control agreement. As of January 1, 2015, the severance amount multiple pursuant thereto is three times, and the benefits continuation period is 36 months.

Mr. Li is eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements applicable to our employees and executive officers. Due to the significant amount of time Mr. Li is expected to spend in Asia and the United States, Mr. Li is also entitled to the continued provision of a car and driver in China on the same basis as applied prior to January 1, 2015, a housing allowance of up to $100,000 per year to be used for housing expenses in Shanghai, China and Aurora, Illinois, and a tax equalization benefit, on the same basis as applied prior to January 1, 2015. He also is able to utilize first class travel while he is employed by us.

Transition and Retirement Arrangement with Mr. Johnson

Following Mr. Beamer’s appointment as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 15, 2018, Mr. Johnson began serving as a Senior Advisor, continuing to report to our chief executive officer. He will be responsible for helping to transition business relationships to Mr. Beamer as his successor and for supporting the company’s significant financial projects. While he serves as a Senior Advisor, Mr. Johnson will receive a base salary of $16,512.50 per month (commencing January 31, 2018). Upon his retirement on January 5, 2019, in exchange for his execution andnon-revocation of a release of claims and agreement to abide by certain restrictive covenants, Mr. Johnson will receive a cash payment equal to $396,300.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    42


New CFO Compensation Arrangement

As previously disclosed, on January 15, 2018, the board of directors appointed Mr. Beamer to the position of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company, in conjunction with Mr. Johnson’s retirement and transition to the role of Senior Advisor through January 5, 2019. In the role of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Beamer will receive an annual base salary of $400,000 and will be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus under the company’s Short-Term Incentive Program with a target equal to 65% of his base salary. In connection with the commencement of Mr. Beamer’s employment with the company, he received asign-on cash bonus equal to $100,000, subject to forfeiture on a pro rata basis in the event that his employment terminates under certain circumstances within 12 months of the date of his appointment. Pursuant to our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, Mr. Beamer received asign-on award of 13,128 time-based restricted stock units on the effective date of his appointment, which will vest ratably over a four-year period based on continued employment, and fiscal year 2018 awards consisting of (i) 2,104 time-based restricted stock units and anon-qualified option to purchase 7,796 shares of our stock at an exercise price of $97.89, the closing price of our stock on the effective date of the award, which will vest ratably over a four-year period based on continued employment, and (ii) a prorated award of performance share units, corresponding to 2,806 performance share units at target, for the performance period beginning October 1, 2017 and ending September 30, 2020, according to the same performance requirements and terms for the performance share unit awards granted in fiscal year 2018 to the company’s named executive officers and other executive officers.

Standard Employee Benefits

We have adopted various employee benefit plans and arrangements for the purpose of providing employee benefits to our employees, including our named executive officers and our other executive officers. In general, the same terms apply to all of our employees, including our named executive officers and our other executive officers. These plans and arrangements include the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 401(k) Plan, the Supplemental Plan, and the Cabot Microelectronics Health and Welfare Benefit Plan.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    43


20142017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table shows all awards granted to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20142017 pursuant to the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

 

Name Grant
Date
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)1
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)2
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option  Awards
($/Sh)
  

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards

($)3

 

William P. Noglows

  12/3/13    25,000            1,102,500  
   12/3/13        67,500    44.10    1,061,114  

William S. Johnson

  12/3/13    8,500            374,850  
   12/3/13        23,100    44.10    363,137  
   12/13/13    289            12,459  

Adam F. Weisman

  12/3/13    7,200            317,520  
   12/3/13        19,500    44.10    306,544  

Ananth Naman

  12/3/13    6,600            291,060  
   12/3/13        17,800    44.10    278,032  

David H. Li

  12/3/13    5,900            260,190  
   12/3/13        16,000    44.10    249,917  
   12/13/13    579            24,961  

Name 

Grant

Date

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)1
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
2
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option  Awards
($/Sh)
  

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards

($)3

 

David H. Li

  12/5/16   19,000         1,145,130 
   12/5/16      79,100   60.27   1,291,648 

William S. Johnson

  12/5/16   9,700         584,619 
   12/5/16      17,300   60.27   291,403 

H. Carol Bernstein

  12/5/16   8,900         536,403 
   12/5/16      15,800   60.27   266,137 

Ananth Naman

  12/5/16   8,200         494,214 
   12/5/16      14,600   60.27   245,924 

Daniel D. Woodland

  12/5/16   8,900         536,403 
   12/5/16      15,800   60.27   266,137 

 

1

The awardsamounts in this column that correspond to a Grant Date of December 13, 2013 reflect the matching grants of “award shares” ofdo not include restricted stock made under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuantunits and performance share units awarded to our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, which is described in more detail below. This column does not include deposit sharesnamed executive officers after the end of fiscal year 2017. On December 5, 2017, as these amounts were purchased by the participant from after-tax bonus compensation already disclosed in the “Bonus” columnpart of our Summary Compensation Table ofannual equity incentive award program, we awarded restricted stock units to our 2014 Proxy Statement. As shown, on December 13, 2013,named executive officers (other than Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Li participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program receiving 289, and 579, respective award shares on deposit under the programJohnson) with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $43.11$92.57 per share. The restrictions on these

award shares willshare that lapse on December 13, 2016 ifin equal increments upon each anniversary over four years, and awarded performance share units to our named executive officers (other than Mr. Johnson) for the participant is employed by us at that time andperformance period of fiscal year 2018 through fiscal year 2020, in the corresponding deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date.amounts set forth in the table below:

In December 2014, none of the named executive officers participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program.

These amounts in this column do not include restricted shares awarded to our named executive officers after the end of fiscal year 2014. On December 3, 2014, as part of our annual equity incentive award program, we awarded restricted shares to our named executive officers with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $46.45 per share that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years, in the amounts set forth in the table below:

Name

 

  

Restricted Stock
     Unit Award     

 

   

Performance
Share
Unit Award
    (Target)    

 

 

Mr. Li

   6,616    13,232 

Mr. Johnson

        

Ms. Bernstein

   2,300    3,100 

Dr. Naman

   2,200    2,900 

Dr. Woodland

   2,900    3,800 

Name

Restricted Stock Award

Mr. Noglows

44,400

Mr. Johnson

7,100

Mr. Weisman

5,800

Dr. Naman

6,100

Mr. Li

5,200

Pursuant to the employment agreement related to Mr. Li’s election as our President and Chief Executive Officer, on January 2, 2015 we awarded 14,700 restricted shares to Mr. Li with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $46.82 with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years.

Pursuant to a retention award approved by the compensation committee, on January 2, 2015, we awarded Mr. Johnson 22,222 restricted shares with a fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the award date of $46.82, with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years. Pursuant to the employment agreement related to the Chief Executive Officer transition, by which Mr. Noglows will continue to serve only as our Executive Chairman, all unvested restricted shares held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.

2

As with all other grants of stock options and stock awards to our named executive officers and other executive officers, other than the number of options or restricted stock or restricted stock units awarded, the terms and conditions of the stock option grants in this column are the same as those made to all other employees. This includes a provision that if a participant retires (defined as the voluntary termination of employment, where no circumstances for termination for cause exist, upon the participant’s achievement of at least 55 years of age and five years of service), then the participant may retain any option previously vested throughout the term of such option; as with our other option grants, any options that have not yet vested as of termination are forfeited.

These amounts do not include options granted to our named executive officers after the end of fiscal year 2014.2017. On December 3, 2014,5, 2017, as part of our annual equity incentive award program, we granted options to our

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    44


named executive officers (other than Mr. Johnson) that have an exercise price of $46.45,$92.57, which as with all of our grants and awards to date was the fair market value based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, vest in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years and expire December 3, 2024,5, 2027, in the amounts set forth in the table below:

 

Name

  Securities Underlying Options 

Mr. NoglowsLi

   22,054               

Mr. Johnson

   18,500—               

Mr. WeismanMs. Bernstein

   15,1007,800               

Dr. Naman

   16,0007,200               

Mr. LiDr. Woodland

   13,5009,600               

Pursuant to the employment agreement related to Mr. Li’s election as our President and Chief Executive Officer, on January 2, 2015, as part of Mr. Li’s appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, we awarded 38,500 stock options to Mr. Li with restrictions that lapse in equal increments upon each anniversary over four years, and the options have an exercise price of $46.82, which is equal to the closing price of our common stock on January 2, 2015.

Pursuant to the employment agreement related to the Chief Executive Officer transition, by which Mr. Noglows will continue to serve only as our Executive Chairman, all unvested stock options held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at the end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.

3 

As with all of our grants and stock awards to date, the exercise price was the fair market value based on the closing price of our stock on the date of grant.

The grant date fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing formula on the basis of the following assumptions: expected volatility: 32%27%; risk free rate of return: 1.9%;2.12% for people younger than the age of 46 at the date of grant and 2.07% for people 46 years and older on the date of grant; annualized dividend yield: 0.0%1.19%; and expected time until exercise: 6.316.58 years for people younger than the age of 46 at the date of grant and 6.397.08 years for people 46 years and older on the date of grant. The differing assumptions based on age relates to differing statistical likelihood of the named executive officer achieving the retirement benefit for all employees for option grants through fiscal year 2017, related to 55 years of age and 5 years of service. On the December 3, 20135, 2016 grant date, Dr. Naman and Mr. Li werewas younger than 46 and Messrs. Noglows,Mr. Johnson, Ms. Bernstein, Dr. Naman and WeismanDr. Woodland were 46 or older.

During fiscal year 2014,2017, no stock awards toheld by our named executive officers, or other executive officers were modified or cancelled (forfeited), and no awards to any of our employees were modified..

Executive Officer Deposit Share Program

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program that our board of directors adopted in March 2000. Under this program, our executive officers are entitled to use all or a portion of theirafter-tax annual cash bonus compensation to purchase at fair market value shares of restricted stock awarded under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and its predecessor, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. These shares are retained on deposit with us until the third anniversary of the date of deposit (“deposit shares”), and our company matches the deposit with a restricted stock grant equal to 50% of the shares deposited by the participant (“award shares”). If the participant is employed by us on the third anniversary of the deposit date and the deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date, the restrictions on the award shares will lapse. SevenAs of January 12, 2018, three individuals, including Mr. Li and Dr. Naman, currently participate in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, and 14,802with a total of 5,938 shares (including award shares) are currently on deposit under that program for all executive officers. Of the named executive officers currently participating in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program, Mr. Johnson, andEach of Mr. Li participate with (i) 1,352, and (ii) 1,159 respective deposit shares and (i) 655, and (ii) 579 respective awardDr. Naman have 1,083 shares on deposit, with 541 corresponding award shares, under the program. These amounts do not include the 44,607 shares (including award shares) no longer under deposit or subject to restrictions as of January 9, 2015, of which Mr. Noglows, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman, and Mr. Li, respectively had (i) 7,684, (ii) 5,948, (iii) 457, and (iv) 407 respective deposit shares and (i) 3,840, (ii) 2,973, (iii) 228, and (iv) 203 respective award shares. On December 14, 2012, Mr. Johnson participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program; he purchased 733 deposit shares and received 366 award shares. The restrictions on the award shares will lapse on December 14, 2015 if Mr. Johnson is employed by us at that time and the corresponding deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date. On December 13, 2013, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Li participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program as follows: Mr. Johnson purchased 579 deposit shares and received 289 award shares; and Mr. Li purchased 1,159 deposit shares and received 579 award shares. The restrictions on the award shares will lapse on December 13, 2016 if the participant is employed by us at that time and the corresponding deposit shares have remained on deposit with us through such date. In December 2014, none of the named executive officers participated in the Executive Officer Deposit Share Program.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    45


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20142017 FISCALYEAR-END

The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and unexercisable as of September 30, 20142017 for each named executive officer.

The table also shows unvested and unearned stock awards assuming a market value of $41.45$79.93 a share (the closing market price of the company’s stock on the last business day of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2014)2017).

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Exercisable1

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Unexercisable1

  

Option
Exercise Price

($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)2

  

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested

($)

 

William P. Noglows

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107,242

83,414

78,336

108,801

81,600

47,872

18,750

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


27,201

47,872

56,250

67,500

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.05

21.77

25.79

21.45

28.62

27.94

32.64

44.10

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/10/2014

12/1/2016

11/30/2017

12/1/2019

12/1/2020

12/1/2021

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    
                   61,000    2,528,450  

William S. Johnson

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,717

40,038

41,344

28,396

18,931

7,350

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


9,466

18,931

22,050

23,100

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.77

25.79

21.45

28.62

27.94

32.64

44.10

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/1/2016

11/30/2017

12/1/2019

12/1/2020

12/1/2021

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    
                   23,300    965,785  

Adam F. Weisman

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,640

42,069

31,769

20,889

15,014

5,925

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


6,964

15,015

17,775

19,500

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.79

16.00

21.45

28.62

27.94

32.64

44.10

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

11/30/2017

12/1/2018

12/1/2019

12/1/2020

12/1/2021

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    
                   18,175    753,354  

Ananth Naman

  

 

 

 

 

 

906

1,687

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 


1,097

11,968

14,625

17,800

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

22.13

21.45

28.62

27.94

32.64

44.10

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

1/21/2018

12/1/2019

12/1/2020

12/1/2021

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

  

  

  

  

  

  

    
                   14,477    600,072  

David H. Li

  

 

 

 

 

6,745

6,745

6,310

4,500

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 


6,746

12,621

13,500

16,000

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

21.45

28.62

27.94

32.64

44.10

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

12/1/2019

12/1/2020

12/1/2021

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

  

  

  

  

  

    
                   15,429    639,532  

Name Option Awards  Stock Awards 
 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Exercisable1

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Unexercisable1

  

Option
Exercise Price

($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
  

Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)2

  

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested

($)

 

David H. Li

  


10,425

 

 

 

 

 

  

4,000

6,750

19,250

43,275

79,100

 

 

 

 

 

  

44.10

46.45

46.82

42.37

60.27

 

 

 

 

 

  

12/3/2023

12/3/2024

1/2/2025

12/3/2025

12/5/2026

 

 

 

 

 

  46,925   3,750,715 

William S. Johnson

  

17,594

17,325

9,250

5,500

 

 

 

 

 

  


5,775

9,250

16,500

17,300

 

 

 

 

 

  

32.64

44.10

46.45

42.37

60.27

 

 

 

 

 

  

12/3/2022

12/3/2023

12/3/2024

12/3/2025

12/5/2026

 

 

 

 

 

  32,786   2,620,585 

H. Carol Bernstein

  

12,225

6,300

4,125

 

 

 

 

  

4,075

6,300

12,375

15,800

 

 

 

 

  

44.10

46.45

42.37

60.27

 

 

 

 

  

12/3/2023

12/3/2024

12/3/2025

12/5/2026

 

 

 

 

  17,525   1,400,773 

Ananth Naman

  


 

 

 

 

  

4,450

8,000

11,775

14,600

 

 

 

 

  

44.10

46.45

42.37

60.27

 

 

 

 

  

12/3/2023

12/3/2024

12/3/2025

12/5/2026

 

 

 

 

  17,400   1,390,782 

Daniel D. Woodland

  


 

 

 

 

  

1,403

2,110

11,775

15,800

 

 

 

 

  

44.10

46.45

42.37

60.27

 

 

 

 

  

12/3/2023

12/3/2024

12/3/2025

12/5/2026

 

 

 

 

  14,700   1,174,971 

 

1

These option awards vest or vested over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the grant date, with a term expiring on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, exceptdate. Outstanding options that pursuant tovested after September 30, 2017 are shown in the employment agreement related to the Chief Executive Officer transition, by which Mr. Noglows will continue to serve only as our Executive Chairman, all unvested stock options held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at endsection entitled “Security Ownership of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by

Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ executionCertain Beneficial Ownership and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.Management” above.

 

2 

The restricted stock awards made to Mr. Noglows are scheduledLi have the following vesting schedules: 7,350 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the January 2, 2015 award date, 2,600 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 2014 award date, and 1,475 shares vested on December 3, 2017 upon the anniversary of the December 3, 2013 award date. The restricted stock unit awards made to vest as follows: 25,000 sharesMr. Li have the following vesting schedules: 19,000 units vest over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20135, 2016 award date, 18,750 sharesand 16,500 units vest over three years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20122015 award date. The restricted stock awards made to Mr. Johnson have the following vesting schedules: 11,111 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the January 2, 2015 award date, 11,0003,550 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 1, 20113, 2014 award date, and 6,2502,125 shares vestvested on December 1, 20143, 2017 upon the anniversary of the December 1, 20103, 2013 award date, except that pursuant to the employment agreement related to the Chief Executive Officer transition, by which Mr. Noglows will continue to serve only as our Executive Chairman, all unvested restricted stock held by Mr. Noglows will vest in full (1) at end of the employment term, subject to Mr. Noglows’ continued employment through the end of the employment term, or (2) upon the earlier termination of Mr. Noglows’ employment by us without cause or by Mr. Noglows due to a material breach by us of the employment letter subject to Mr. Noglows’ execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us.date. The restricted stock

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    46


unit awards made to Mr. Johnson are scheduled to vest as follows: 8,500 shareshave the following vesting schedules: 9,700 units vest over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20135, 2016 award date, 7,350 sharesand 6,300 units vest over three years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20122015 award date, 4,350date. The restricted stock awards made to Ms. Bernstein have the following vesting schedules: 2,400 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 1, 20113, 2014 award date, 2,175and 1,500 shares vestvested on December 1, 20143, 2017 upon the anniversary of the December 1, 20103, 2013 award date, 270 “award shares” vest on December 15, 2014, 366 “award shares” vest on December 14, 2015, and 289 “award shares” vest on December 13, 2016.date. The restricted stock unit awards made to Mr. Weisman are scheduled to vest as follows: 7,200 sharesMs. Bernstein have the following vesting schedules: 8,900 units vest over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20135, 2016 award date, 5,925 sharesand 4,725 units vest over three years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20122015 award date, 3,450date. The restricted stock awards made to Dr. Naman have the following vesting schedules: 3,050 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 1, 20113, 2014 award date, and 1,6001,650 shares vestvested on December 1, 20143, 2017 upon the anniversary of the December 1, 20103, 2013 award date. The restricted stock unit awards made to Dr. Naman are scheduled to vest as follows: 6,600 shareshave the following vesting schedules: 8,200 units vest over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20135, 2016 award date, 4,875 sharesand 4,500 units vest over three years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20122015 award date, 2,750date. The restricted stock awards made to Dr. Woodland have the following vesting schedules: 780 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 1, 20113, 2014 award date, 252520 shares vestvested on December 1, 20143, 2017 upon the anniversary of the December 1, 20103, 2013 award date. The restricted stock unit awards made to Mr. Li are scheduled to vest as follows: 5,900 sharesDr. Woodland have the following vesting schedules: 8,900 units vest over four years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20135, 2016 award date, and 4,500 sharesunits vest over three years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 3, 20122015 award date, 2,900 shares vest over two years in equal increments upon each anniversary of the December 1, 2011 award date, 1,550 shares vest on December 1, 2014 upon the anniversary of the December 1, 2010 award date, and 579 “award shares” vest on December 13, 2016.

date.

20142017 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock options exercised during fiscal year 20142017 and stock awards vested during fiscal year 20142017 for the named executive officers.

 

    Option Awards   Stock Awards 
Name  

Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise

(#)1

   

Value
Realized

on

Exercise
($)2

   Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
   

Value
Realized

on

Vesting

($)2

 

William P. Noglows

   613,416     5,419,614     24,250     1,081,485  

William S. Johnson

   177,272     3,511,242     9,475     422,056  

Adam F. Weisman

   59,864     1,328,821     7,125     317,663  

Ananth Naman

   20,132     258,279     3,640     161,874  

David H. Li

             6,050     269,854  

Name  Option Awards   Stock Awards 
  

Number

of Shares
Acquired
on

Exercise

(#)

   

Value
Realized
on

Exercise
($)
1

   

Number
of Shares
Acquired
on

Vesting
(#)

   

Value
Realized
on

Vesting
($)
2

 

David H. Li

   46,501    1,218,501    14,029    858,372 

William S. Johnson

   68,599    2,674,552    14,295    879,582 

H. Carol Bernstein

   33,968    1,217,989    6,000    361,620 

Ananth Naman

   43,602    1,347,095    6,300    379,701 

Daniel D. Woodland

   7,490    134,071    2,779    167,490 

 

1

These amounts do not include options exercised by our named executive officers after the end of fiscal year 2014. The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock options exercised between October 1, 2014 and January 9, 2015 by our named executive officers:

    Option Awards 
Name  

Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise

(#)

   

Value
Realized

on

Exercise
($)

 

Mr. Noglows

   107,242     2,250,935  

Mr. Johnson

   37,717     972,552  

Mr. Weisman

   41,640     998,456  

Dr. Naman

          

Mr. Li

   19,800     437,986  

All options exercised in fiscal year 2014 and after the end of the fiscal year by Mr. Noglows were options expiring in either 2013 or 2014, and as such, only a limited number of regular quarterly trading periods remained prior to their expiration.

2

For option awards, the value realized on exercise is equal to the aggregate difference between the exercise price of the options and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise.

2For stock awards, the value realized is the number of shares vested multiplied by the fair market value of the shares at the time of vesting.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    47


PENSION BENEFITS

The company does not maintain a defined benefit pension program.

20142017 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The company maintains the Cabot Microelectronics Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan, which is a nonqualified supplemental savings plan (the “Supplemental Plan”). The following table discloses the earnings and balances of our named executive officers under the company’s Supplemental Plan that provides for compensation deferral on anon-tax-qualified basis.

 

Name  

Registrant

contributions

in last FY ($)1

   

Aggregate

earnings

in last FY ($)

   

Aggregate

balance at

last FYE ($)

 

William P. Noglows

   44,860     24,432     461,576  

William S. Johnson

   15,242     20,834     200,154  

Adam F. Weisman

   14,040     19,119     153,426  

Ananth Naman

   10,036     2,642     29,467  

David H. Li

   11,384     4     38,496  

Name

 

  

Registrant

contributions

in last FY ($)1

 

   

Aggregate

earnings

in last FY ($)

 

   

Aggregate

balance at

last FYE ($)

 

 

David H. Li

 

   

 

19,044

 

 

 

   

 

7,673

 

 

 

   

 

115,810

 

 

 

William S. Johnson

 

   

 

7,317

 

 

 

   

 

45,033

 

 

 

   

 

296,511

 

 

 

H. Carol Bernstein

 

   

 

4,444

 

 

 

   

 

40,380

 

 

 

   

 

277,083

 

 

 

Ananth Naman

 

   

 

5,112

 

 

 

   

 

5,291

 

 

 

   

 

62,725

 

 

 

Daniel D. Woodland

 

   

 

2,012

 

 

 

   

 

2,168

 

 

 

   

 

14,441

 

 

 

 

1 

These amounts are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Effective May 1, 2000, the company adopted the Supplemental Plan covering all eligible employees as defined by the Supplemental Plan. Participants in the Supplemental Plan, including our named executive officers, do not make any contributions to the Supplemental Plan. The purpose of the Supplemental Plan is to provide for the deferral of the company contributions to certain highly compensated employees as defined under the provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Under the Supplemental Plan, the company contributes up to 4% of the named executive officers’ eligible compensation in excess of the I.R.S. eligible compensation limit. All amounts contributed by the company and earnings on these contributions are fully vested at all times. The same menu of investment funds under the 401(k) Plan is available under the Supplemental Plan. Like the 401(k) Plan, all investment decisions are made by the participants. Participants in the Supplemental Plan are not permitted to make hardship withdrawals prior to termination and distributions under the Supplemental Plan are paid in a lump sum.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    48


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The following tablestable and the accompanying narrative show potential benefits payable to our named executive officers upon the occurrence of the events specified herein, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 20142017 and excluding certain benefits generally available to all salaried employees. Except as noted, the amounts disclosed below reflect the aggregate potential payments under each scenario and category. These tables do not include amounts to the extent that the form and amount of any payment or benefit are fully disclosed in an earlier table.

William P. Noglows

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination with or without a change in control for named executive officer William P. Noglows, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 2014, under the terms of his original employment agreement in effect on such date and prior to this agreement being superseded as described above. Footnotes describing the assumptions in calculations are included following the last table in this section, as is a description of the employment terms and plans providing benefits specified in the table below. Except as noted, the amounts disclosed below reflect the aggregate potential payments under each scenario and category. The table does not include amounts to the extent that the form and amount of any payment or benefit are fully disclosed in an earlier table.

 

   Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason
Termination
         
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon
Termination
 No Change in Control  In Connection with
a Change in Control
  Death  Disability 

Salary Continuation

 $640,0001  $1,920,000          

Bonus Through Termination Date2

     $750,000          

Bonus Continuation2

     $2,250,000          

Contributions under Retirement Plans

     $204,780          

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options3

 $837,552   $1,491,302   $1,491,302   $1,491,302  

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock4

     $2,528,450   $2,528,450   $2,528,450  

Post-termination Health Care5

     $30,000          

Outplacement Services

     $96,000          

280G Tax Gross Up

     $0          

Total:

 $1,477,552   $9,270,532   $4,019,752   $4,019,752  

William S. Johnson

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination with or without a change in control for named executive officer William S. Johnson, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 2014. Footnotes describing the assumptions in calculations are included following the last table in this section, as is a description of the employment terms and plans providing benefits specified in the table below.

   Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason
Termination
         
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon
Termination
 No Change in Control  In Connection with
a Change in Control
  Death  Disability 

Salary Continuation

     $740,000          

Bonus Through Termination Date2

     $277,500          

Bonus Continuation2

     $555,000          

Contributions under Retirement Plans

     $77,284          

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options3

     $571,467   $571,467   $571,467  

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock4

     $965,785   $965,785   $965,785  

Post-termination Health Care5

     $20,000          

Outplacement Services

     $55,500          

280G Tax Gross Up

     $0          

Total:

     $3,262,536   $1,537,252   $1,537,252  

Adam F. Weisman

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination with or without a change in control for named executive officer Adam F. Weisman, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 2014. Footnotes describing the assumptions in calculations are included following the last table in this section, as is a description of the employment terms and plans providing benefits specified in the table below.

   Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason
Termination
         
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon
Termination
 No Change in  Control6  In Connection with
a Change in Control
  Death  Disability 

Salary Continuation

     $720,000          

Bonus Through Termination Date2

     $270,000          

Bonus Continuation2

     $540,000          

Contributions under Retirement Plans

     $74,932          

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options3

     $448,799   $448,799   $448,799  

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock4

     $753,354   $753,354   $753,354  

Post-termination Health Care5

     $20,000          

Outplacement Services

     $54,000          

280G Tax Gross Up

     $0          

Total:

     $2,881,085   $1,202,153   $1,202,153  

Ananth Naman

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination with or without a change in control for named executive officer Ananth Naman, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 2014. Footnotes describing the assumptions in calculations are included following the last table in this section, as is a description of the employment terms and plans providing benefits specified in the table below.

   Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason
Termination
         
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon
Termination
 No Change in Control  In Connection with
a Change in Control
  Death  Disability 

Salary Continuation

     $660,000          

Bonus Through Termination Date2

     $205,900          

Bonus Continuation2

     $411,800          

Contributions under Retirement Plans

     $68,622          

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options3

     $304,608   $304,608   $304,608  

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock4

     $600,072   $600,072   $600,072  

Post-termination Health Care5

     $20,000          

Outplacement Services

     $49,500          

280G Tax Gross Up7

                

Total:

     $2,320,502   $904,680   $904,680  

David H. Li

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination with or without a change in control for named executive officer David H. Li, assuming such events occurred on September 30, 2014, and prior to his employment agreement for service as our President and Chief Executive Officer, as described above. Footnotes describing the assumptions in calculations are included following the last table in this section, as is a description of the employment terms and plans providing benefits specified in the table below.

   Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason
Termination
         
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon
Termination
 No Change in Control  In Connection with
a Change in Control
  Death  Disability 

Salary Continuation

     $672,000          

Bonus Through Termination Date2

     $219,600          

Bonus Continuation2

     $439,200          

Contributions under Retirement Plans

     $69,628          

Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options3

     $375,996   $375,996   $375,996  

Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock4

     $639,532   $639,532   $639,532  

Post-termination Health Care5

     $20,000          

Outplacement Services

     $50,400          

280G Tax Gross Up

     $0          

Total:

     $2,486,356   $1,015,528   $1,015,528  

Named Executive Officer
and Triggering
Event

 

 

Cash
Severance
1

 

  

Bonus
Through
Termination
Date
2

 

  

Bonus
Continuation
2

 

  

Retirement

Plan
Contributions

 

  

Accelerated
Vesting of
Equity
Awards
3

 

  

Post-
Termination
Healthcare
4

 

  

Outplacement
Services

 

  

280G

Tax Gross
Up
5

 

  

Total

 

 

 

  David H. Li

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – No Change in Control)

 

 $

 

630,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

 2,840,409

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

3,470,409

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – With Change in Control)

 

 $

 

 1,890,000

 

 

 

 $

 

 640,800

 

 

 

 $

 

 1,922,400

 

 

 

 $

 

 130,032

 

 

 

 $

 

7,937,908

 

 

 

 $

 

 30,000

 

 

 

 $

 

 94,500

 

 

 

 $

 

 2,276,500

 

 

 

 $

 

 14,922,140

 

 

 

•   Death

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

7,937,908

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

7,937,908

 

 

 

•   Disability

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

7,937,908

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

7,937,908

 

 

 

  William S. Johnson

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – No Change in Control)

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – With Change in Control)

 

 $

 

792,600

 

 

 

 $

 

307,100

 

 

 

 $

 

614,200

 

 

 

 $

 

63,234

 

 

 

 $

 

4,097,051

 

 

 

 $

 

20,000

 

 

 

 $

 

59,445

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

5,953,630

 

 

 

•   Death

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,097,051

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,097,051

 

 

 

•   Disability

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,097,051

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,097,051

 

 

 

  H. Carol Bernstein

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – No Change in Control)

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – With Change in Control)

 

 $

 

709,400

 

 

 

 $

 

231,600

 

 

 

 $

 

463,200

 

 

 

 $

 

58,256

 

 

 

 $

 

2,533,137

 

 

 

 $

 

20,000

 

 

 

 $

 

53,205

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,068,798

 

 

 

•   Death

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,533,137

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,533,137

 

 

 

•   Disability

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,533,137

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,533,137

 

 

 

  Ananth Naman

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – No Change in Control)

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – With Change in Control)

 

 $

 

724,000

 

 

 

 $

 

225,200

 

 

 

 $

 

450,400

 

 

 

 $

 

58,962

 

 

 

 $

 

2,547,371

 

 

 

 $

 

20,000

 

 

 

 $

 

54,300

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

4,080,233

 

 

 

•   Death

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,547,371

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,547,371

 

 

 

•   Disability

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,547,371

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,547,371

 

 

 

  Daniel D. Woodland

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – No Change in Control)

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

•   Involuntary (Not for Cause or Good Reason – With Change in Control)

 

 $

 

650,000

 

 

 

 $

 

188,500

 

 

 

 $

 

377,000

 

 

 

 $

 

53,652

 

 

 

 $

 

2,048,780

 

 

 

 $

 

20,000

 

 

 

 $

 

48,750

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

3,386,682

 

 

 

•   Death

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,048,780

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,048,780

 

 

 

•   Disability

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,048,780

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 $

 

2,048,780

 

 

 

 

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    49


1 

This figure reflects (i) for Mr. Li only, in the event of a termination not for cause or for good reason not in connection with a Change in Control, the lump sum value of twelve months of salary continuation.

continuation, or (ii) in the event of a termination not for cause or for good reason in connection with a Change in Control, the lump sum value of three times (in the case of Mr. Li) or two times (in the case of the other named executive officers) the executive’s annual base salary.

 

2

In accordance with the terms of the change in control agreements described below, for purposes of calculating the bonus through the termination date, the bonus amount for each named executive officer is equal to the greatest of: (i) the target bonus amount for the fiscal year in which the Change in Control occurs, (ii) the target bonus amount for the fiscal year in which the termination date occurs, and (iii) the highest bonus amount paid or payable to the named executive officer in respect of any of the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the Change in Control occurs. Assuming a Change in Control and termination date as of September 30, 2014,2017, the bonus amounts for Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weisman represent the target bonus amounts for fiscal year 2014. The bonus amounts for Mr. Noglows, Dr. Naman, and Mr. Lieach named executive officer represent the highest bonus amountamounts paid to them in respect of one of the three fiscal years preceding fiscal year 2014.2017. The amountamounts disclosed as bonus continuation for Mr. NoglowsLi represents three times his bonus amount and the amountamounts disclosed as bonus continuation for Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman,Ms. Bernstein, Dr. Naman, and Mr. Li representsDr. Woodland represent two times their bonus amounts, each in accordance with the terms of the change in control agreements described below.

 

3 

This figure represents the aggregate difference between the exercise pricevalue of the accelerated stock options, restricted stock units and $41.45, which wasrestricted stock, based on the fair market value of a share of our common stock on September 30, 2014. This figure does2017 ($79.93). For the stock options, the aggregate value is equal to the difference between the exercise price of the accelerated options and the fair market value of a share of our common stock on September 30, 2017, not includeincluding the value of vested but unexercised options. For restricted stock units and restricted stock, the aggregate value is equal to the number of shares and units vested multiplied by the fair market value of the shares on September 30, 2017, not including the value of restricted stock that has already vested (including shares on deposit under our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program). The table below sets forth the value of accelerated options, the total value of all options which includes(including the value of the accelerated options and the vested but unexercised optionsoptions), and the value of accelerated restricted stock units and restricted stock as of September 30, 2014.

2017.

 

Named Executive Officer

  Total Value of Options 

Mr. Noglows

  $10,046,044  

Mr. Johnson

  $3,452,445  

Mr. Weisman

  $3,189,021  

Dr. Naman

  $355,852  

Mr. Li

  $722,327  

For Mr. Noglows, the figure disclosed in the “No Change in Control” column represents the value of his outstanding and unexercisable options that were scheduled to vest during the twelve months following termination, in accordance with the terms of Mr. Noglows’ original employment agreement. For purposes of this table, the value of these options was also calculated assuming a market price of $41.45, which was the fair market value of a share of our common stock on September 30, 2014.

Named Executive

        Officer        

 

 

Value of
Accelerated Options
(Non-Change in
        Control)        

 

  

Value of
Accelerated Options

 (Change in Control) 

 

  

Total Value of Options

 

  

Value of Accelerated
RSUs and
Restricted Stock (Non-
    Change in Control)    

 

  

Value of
Accelerated
RSUs and
Restricted Stock
(Change in Control)

 

 

Mr. Li

 

 $ 1,505,578  $ 4,187,193  $ 4,578,756  $ 1,334,831  $ 3,750,715 

Mr. Johnson

 

    $1,476,466  $3,445,511     $2,620,585 

Ms. Bernstein

 

    $1,132,364  $1,936,245     $1,400,773 

Dr. Naman

 

    $1,156,589  $1,156,589     $1,390,782 

Dr. Woodland

 

    $873,809  $873,809     $1,174,971 

In the event of a termination of service by reason of death or disability, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the non-qualified stock option grantaward agreements under each plan,thereunder, provide that unvested options, restricted stock and restricted stock units shall fully vest for all participants, including the named executive officers.

 

4 

This figure represents the number of shares vested multiplied by $41.45, which was the fair market value of the shares on September 30, 2014. This figure does not include the value of restricted stock that has already vested, including shares on deposit under our Executive Officer Deposit Share Program.

In the event of a termination of service by reason of death or disability, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the restricted stock award agreements under each plan, provide that unvested restricted stock shall fully vest for all participants, including the named executive officers.

5

This amount assumes comparable health care coverage to that which is currently provided under our existing plan. Our company is self-insured, therefore there is no direct employer contribution amount. We have estimated the cost of post-termination health care to be $10,000 per person per year. This amount could vary depending on the details of any new or replacement plan that may be in place in the event of a change in control, or any changes to our plan that are made for regulatory or other reasons.

 

65 

As described in greaterMore detail, above, as of December 31, 2014, Mr. Weisman has resigned his position as Executive Vice President, Business Operations, and will resign his employment effective April 1, 2015 (“Resignation Date”); inincluding the interim he is performing transition responsibilities for us. The consideration to be providedexpected ameliorating effect over time (with respect to Mr. Weisman following the Resignation Date, and the terms and conditions thereof are described in detail above and below; this column does not contemplate such arrangement or amounts to beLi), is provided thereunder.

7

As described in more detail in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” below, Dr. Naman’s Change“Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement, which was entered into subsequent to 2008, does not provide for a “gross-up payment” (“280G Tax Gross Up”) for excise taxes that may be assessed on amounts received in connection with a change in control of our company. Instead, Dr. Naman’s Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement provides in the event that amounts or benefits Dr. Naman would receive under such agreement or otherwise would subject Dr. Naman to excise taxes, we would reduce such amounts and benefits up to an amount such that Dr. Naman would not be subject to excise taxes, provided that such reduction results in greater after-tax benefits to Dr. Naman.

Agreements,” below.

Pursuant to the terms of the company’s 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the awards granted thereunder, the named executive officers receive the accelerated vesting of certain equity awards in the event of a Change in

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    50


Control without termination of employment. The value of the accelerated vesting for each named executive officer, assuming a change in control, is the same value as disclosed in the “In Connection with a Change in Control” columnrows above.

Employment AgreementLetter with Mr. Li

PursuantAs described in the narrative to the Summary Compensation Table above, pursuant to the employment letter we entered into with Mr. Li in connection with his appointment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, as of January 1, 2015, the severance amount multiple pursuant to Mr. Noglows’ original November 3, 2003 employment agreement, whichLi’s Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement was in effect as of September 30, 2014 but whichincreased to three times, and the benefits continuation period was superseded as described above, if we terminate his employment without cause or Mr. Noglows terminates his employment because we breached the terms of his agreement, the company must pay Mr. Noglows one year’s base salary over the one year period following such termination and allow any options that would vest during such periodincreased to vest during such time. Aside from the requirements set forth in the employment agreement, there are no other material conditions to receipt by Mr. Noglows of these termination benefits, although Mr. Noglows still would be subject to the terms of our standard confidentiality, intellectual property and non-competition agreement, which he entered into when he joined our company, and of the relevant

36 months.

stock option grant agreements. The amount and terms of this severance arrangement was determined by our compensation committee, in consultation with its outside compensation consultant, and included consideration of market practices for similar arrangements for other chief executive officers of comparable companies.

Change in Control Severance Protection Agreements

We have entered into Change in Control Severance Protection Agreements (“change in control agreements”), the specific form of which is available as Exhibit 10.23 to our Form10-K filed on November 25, 2008, with each of the named executive officers, our other executive officers, and certain key employees of our company, because we believe such agreements are valuable aspects in enabling a smooth transition and providing continuity of management in the event of a change in control of our company; all of the change in control agreements remain unamended and according to such filed exhibit. Under the change in control agreements, which are “double trigger” agreements and which we believe are in compliance with the American Jobs Creation Act, each executive officer, including the named executive officers, whose employment with us terminates (including an executive’s voluntary termination of employment for either “good reason”, as defined in the agreement, or during thethirty-day period commencing on the first anniversary of a “change in control”), other than for cause, disability, death, or certain other specified reasons, within thirteen months after a “change in control” of our company (as such term is defined in the agreements), is entitled to a severance benefit. The severance benefit includes:

 

accrued and unpaid compensation including: base salary, reimbursement for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by the executive on our behalf through the date of termination, vacation pay and earned and unpaid bonuses and incentive compensation with respect to the period prior to the termination date;

 

the Bonus Amount (which is the greatest of (i) the executive’s target bonus amount for the fiscal year in which the change in control occurs, (ii) the executive’s target bonus amount for the fiscal year in which the termination date occurs, and (iii) the highest bonus paid or payable to the executive in respect of any of the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which change in control occurs),pro-rated for the number of days that have elapsed in the fiscal year through the termination date;

 

two times (in the case of Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman,Ms. Bernstein, Dr. Naman, and Mr. Li)Dr. Woodland) or three times (in the case of Mr. Noglows, or Mr. Li as of January 1, 2015 pursuant to the terms of his employment letter),Li) the executive’s annual base salary plus the Bonus Amount plus an amount equal to the contributions made or credited by us under all qualified andnon-qualified retirement plans for the benefit of the executive for the most recently completed plan year of each such plan (e.g., the 401(k) Plan and Supplemental Plan), payable in a lump sum;

 

health and welfare benefits (consistent with health and welfare benefits available to all employees for which they had been eligible prior to their termination) for 24 months (in the case of Mr. Johnson, Mr. Weisman,Ms. Bernstein, Dr. Naman, and Mr. Li)Dr. Woodland) or 36 months (in the case of Mr. Noglows, or Mr. Li as of January 1, 2015 pursuant to the terms of his employment letter)Li) following the executive’s termination date;

 

payment or reimbursement for the costs, fees and expense of outplacement assistance services, up to a maximum of fifteen percent15% of the executive’s annual base salary; and

 

only for change in control severance protection agreements for executive officers entered into as of 2008, a full “gross-up“gross-up payment” of any and all excise (but not income) taxes assessed on amounts received under the change in control agreements, as well as all other taxes, other than income taxes, that may become due as a result of the gross-up payment. Any change in control severance protection agreement entered into subsequent to 2008 for a new executive officer does not include this provision.

Cause

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    51


become due as a result of thegross-up payment. Mr. Li’s change in control severance protection agreement was entered into as of 2008, and thus the terms of his agreement provide for such treatment. The hypothetical amount of the excise tax (“280G”)gross-up reported as payable in the table above for Mr. Li is based only on circumstances in place as of September 30, 2017, including Mr. Li’s relatively low five-year averageW-2 income level (or “base amount”) used to calculate the potential excise tax amount from years prior to Mr. Li’s appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2015, when his compensation was considerably lower, versus his current compensation level as our President and Chief Executive Officer. This hypothetical amount has and is expected to continue to ameliorate over time as he increases his tenure as President and Chief Executive Officer. Actual excise tax amounts, if any, would be determined based on the circumstances existing at the time of an actual change in control transaction, considering any relevant factors, including but not limited to the value of services to be provided in the event of a change in control, and/or an agreement to refrain from performing services pursuant to a covenant not to compete or similar covenant in existence prior to, at the time of, or after a change in control of the company. Any change in control severance protection agreement entered into subsequent to 2008 for a new executive officer does not include this provision. Dr. Naman’s and Dr. Woodland’s change in control severance protection agreements, which were entered into subsequent to 2008, thus do not include this provision. Instead, Dr. Naman’s and Dr. Woodland’s agreements provide that in the event that amounts or benefits they would receive under such agreements or otherwise would subject them to excise taxes, we would reduce such amounts and benefits up to an amount such that they would not be subject to excise taxes, provided that such reduction results in greaterafter-tax benefits to them. Actual excise tax amounts and related reductions, if any, would be determined based on the circumstances existing at the time of an actual change in control transaction, considering any relevant factors, including but not limited to the value of services to be provided in the event of a change in control, and/or an agreement to refrain from performing services pursuant to a covenant not to compete or similar covenant in existence prior to, at the time of, or after a change in control of the company.

“Cause” as defined in the agreements means (i) the willful and continued failure to perform substantially the duties reasonably assigned to the executive and (ii) the willful engaging in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise.

The agreements define “Good Reason” as the taking of actions by the company that result in a material negative change in the executive’s employment relationship, including (i) a change in the executive’s status, title, position or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities) which represents a material adverse change from those in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, (ii) an assignment of the executive’s duties or responsibilities that are materially inconsistent with his or her status, title, position or responsibilities as of immediately prior to the Change in Control, (iii) a material decrease in the executive’s annual base salary below the rate in effect as of the Change in Control or as of any date following the Change in Control, whichever is greater (iv) relocation of the offices of the company or operating unit at which the executive is principally employed that increases the executive’sone-way commute by more than thirty-five (35) miles from the location of the offices occupied immediately prior to such relocation, or (v) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the company of the agreement.

A “Change in Control” means (i) any person, together with all affiliates and associates (within the meaning of Rule12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act), acquires beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, or securities of the company representing at least thirty percent (30%)30% of the combined voting power of the company’s then outstanding voting securities, (ii) during any period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months beginning on or after the date of the agreement, individuals who, at the beginning of that24-month period, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”), cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that a new director of the company whose election or nomination for election as a director of the company was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Directors will be deemed to be an Incumbent Director, (iii) one of the following events occur at a special or annual meeting of the company’s stockholder:stockholders: (a) two or more nominees who are both (A) nominees of and endorsed by the company and (B) not employees of the company or any Affiliate at the time of the election are not elected to serve as directors; and (b) any person not a

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    52


nominee of, and endorsed by, the company is elected to serve as a director of the company, (iv) the consummation of: (a) a merger, consolidation or reorganization involving the company, unless the merger, consolidation or reorganization is a “Non-Control“Non-Control Transaction”; or (b) an agreement for the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the company to any Person (other than a transfer to a Change in Control Subsidiary), or (v) the stockholders of the company approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control will not be deemed to occur solely because a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than the permitted amount of the then outstanding voting securities as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the company which, by reducing the number of voting securities then outstanding, increases the percentage of shares beneficially owned by the person. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Change in Control would occur but for the operation of the preceding sentence as a result of the acquisition of voting securities by the company, and after that acquisition by the company, the person described in the preceding sentence increases the percentage of then outstanding voting securities he or she owns, a Change in Control will occur.

We also have similar change in control severance protection agreements providing for two times severance benefits in place with our other executive officers (with the exception of our Principal Accounting Officer, Thomas S. Roman, whose agreement provides for one times severance benefits). Under the change in control agreements, all amounts accrued or awarded to the executive officers under any incentive compensation or benefit plan, including options and restricted stock awarded under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, will immediately vest on each executive’s respective termination date if the executive is entitled to severance benefits.

Our board of directors and compensation committee determined the terms and conditions of the change in control severance protection agreements, including the severance benefit payable, and the triggering events for the payment of such severance benefit, pursuant to such agreement, in consultation with their outsideindependent compensation consultant and our financial and other advisors, and considered external practices at similarly situated companies regarding change in control arrangements.

Treatment of Equity Awards

The 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan provideprovides that an award shall immediately terminate on the date a participant’s service terminates, unless otherwise set forth in an award agreement. Similarly, in the event of a Change in Control, the compensation committee has the discretion to provide for accelerated vesting in an award agreement. In the event of a Change in Control that is a merger or consolidation in which the company is not the surviving corporation or that results in the acquisition of substantially all of the company’s outstanding stock or in the event of a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the company’s assets (a “Covered Transaction”), the compensation committee has the discretion to provide for the termination of all outstanding options as of the effective date of the Covered Transaction; provided, that, if the Covered Transaction follows a Change in Control or would give rise to a Change in Control, no option will be terminated prior to the expiration of twenty days following the later of: (i) the date on which the award became fully exercisable and (ii) the date on which the participant receive written notice of the Covered Transaction.

Under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, “Change in Control” means: (a) any “person” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the 1934 Act (other than (i) the company, (ii) any subsidiary of the company, (iii) any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the company or of any subsidiary of the company, or (iv) any company owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the company), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act), together with all Affiliates and Associates (as such terms are used in Rule12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the 1934 Act) of such person, directly or indirectly, of securities of the company representing thirty percent (30%)30% or more of the combined voting power of the company’s then outstanding securities; (b) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the company with any other company, other than (i) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the company or any subsidiary of the company, at

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    53


least sixty percent (60%)60% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the company (or similar transaction) after which no “person” (with the method of determining “beneficial ownership” used in clause (a) of this definition) owns more than thirty percent (30%)30% of the combined voting power of the securities of the company or the surviving entity of such merger or consolidation; or (c) during any period of two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the execution of the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan or the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as applicable), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has conducted or threatened a proxy contest, or has entered into an agreement with the company to effect a transaction described in clause (a), (b) or (d) of this definition) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; or (d) the stockholders of the company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the company of all or substantially all of the company’s assets.

Pursuant to thenon-qualified stock option grant agreements, the option grants will become fully vested in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan). In the event of a Change in Control that constitutes a Covered Transaction, the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, terminate any or all outstanding options as of the effective date of the Covered Transaction; provided that the compensation committee may not terminate an option outstanding under the agreement earlier than twenty days following the later of: (i) the date on which the award became fully vested and (ii) the date on which the participant received written notice of the Covered Transaction. In the event of a termination of service by reason of death or Disability, then any unvested portion of the options will become

fully vested. Disability has the meaning provided under (i) first, an employment agreement between the participant and the company, (ii) second, if no employment agreement exists, the long-term disability program maintained by the company or any governmental entity covering the Participant, or (iii) third, if no such agreement or program exists, permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

Pursuant to the restricted stock and restricted stock unit (RSUs) award agreements, the awards will become fully vested and all restrictions will lapse in the event of a participant’s death, Disability, or Change in Control (as defined in the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan). Disability has the meaning provided under (i) first, an employment agreement between the participant and the company, (ii) second, if no such employment agreement exists, the long-term disability program maintained by the company or any governmental entity covering the participant, or (iii) third, if no such agreement or program exists, as defined under local law.

With respect to fiscal year 2018 performance share units (PSUs) granted in December 2018, in the event of a participant’s death, the awards will vest at target; in the event of Disability, the awards will vest on a prorated basis, based on actual performance through the end of the three-year performance period. In the event of a Change in Control prior to the end of the performance period, (i) if the PSUs are not assumed by the acquirer, the PSUs will vest at the target award level and be settled within 30 days following the Change in Control, and (ii) if the PSUs are assumed by the acquirer, the PSUs will be converted into RSUs that will vest at the end of the performance period. If the participant’s employment is terminated by the company without cause within the twelve-month period following the Change in Control, or if the participant’s employment otherwise terminates in a manner that would entitle him or her to benefits under a change in control severance agreement with the company (to the extent the participant is a party to such an agreement), the converted RSUs will immediately vest in full.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    54


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Certain Relationships

At present we have no related party transactions and there are no currently proposed related party transactions.

Related Party Transactions

Although at present we have no related party transactions, we may from time to time enter into transactions with “related persons.” Related persons include our directors and executive officers, nominees for director, 5% or more beneficial owners of our common stock, and immediate family members of such persons. As set forth in our audit committee charter, a current copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A and is also available on our website atwww.cabotcmp.com, any related person transaction must be reviewed and approved in advance by our audit committee. All of our employees, including our executive officers and directors, are subject to our Code of Business Conduct, which is available on our website. Our Code of Business Conduct prohibits any relationship that may present, or appears to present, a conflict of interest with our company. Among other things, this includes a prohibition on the holding of more than a nominal financial interest in or financial relationship with any publicly held company with whom we do business or compete, and prohibits any financial interest in or financial relationship with such entities if they are privately held. Any request for waiver of our Code of Business Conduct for our directors and executive officers may be approved only by our board of directors; to date, no such waivers have been requested or approved. In addition to the provisions of our Code of Business Conduct, our nominating and corporate governance committee charter and our corporate governance guidelines, both of which are also available on our website, also contain provisions requiring the review of potential conflicts of interest of prospective and current directors and the requirement of notification, and offer of tender of resignation, by directors, and review by the nominating and corporate governance committee and the board of directors of any change in employment orfor-profit board membership status.

Indemnification

Our bylaws and our certificate of incorporation require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law. We have entered into indemnification agreements with all of our directors and executive officers in which we confirm that we will provide to them the indemnification rights provided for in our bylaws and agree to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance on their behalf.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    55


NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Under Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, and as implemented by SEC Proposed Rule14a-21(a), our company must conduct a separatenon-binding stockholder advisory vote at least every three years to approve our company’s executive officer compensation, as disclosed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, related compensation tables, and other related material (“named executive officer compensation program”) under the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, in any proxy or consent or authorization for an annual or other meeting of our stockholders. Our stockholders supported a one year frequency for this stockholder advisory vote at our 20112017 Annual Meeting. As such, the board of directors has determined the company will hold anon-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every year.

Thus, our board of directors is providing stockholders with the opportunity to cast anon-binding advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation program at our 20152018 Annual Meeting. This vote will not be binding on or overrule any decisions by our board of directors, and will not create or imply any additional fiduciary duty on the part of our board of directors. However, our compensation committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future named executive officer compensation arrangements.

As described in greater detail in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis above, we believe that our named executive officer compensation program is structured in a manner that most effectively supports our company and our business objectives. Our named executive officer compensation program is substantially tied to our key business objectives and the success of our stockholders. If value we deliver to our stockholders declines, so does the compensation we deliver to our executive officers. We also closely monitor the various short-term and long-term aspects of our named executive officer compensation program, including base salary, annual cash bonus and equity incentives, in comparison to similar programs and practices at comparable companies, so that we may confirm that our named executive officer compensation program is within the norm of the range of market practices.

Our board of directors determined that the best way to allow our stockholders to vote on the company’s named executive officer compensation program is through the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve Cabot Microelectronics Corporation’s compensation of its named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related material).

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” this proposal.

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited our financial statements for fiscal year 2014,2017, and has been selected by the audit committee of our board of directors to audit our financial statements for fiscal year 2015.2018. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to attend our annual meeting, where she will have the opportunity to make a statement, if she desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Stockholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, our board of directors is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, our audit committee will review its future selection of auditors. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

For information regarding audit and other fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered in fiscal year 20142017 and fiscal year 2013,2016, see “FEES OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT — Fees Billed by Independent Auditors,” above.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of our independent auditors.

LOGO2018 Proxy Statement    56


20162019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders is presently scheduled to be held on Tuesday,Wednesday, March 8, 2016.6, 2019. Any proposals of stockholders intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for our 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Secretary of our company at our offices at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504, by Friday, September 25, 2015.21, 2018. If a stockholder of the company intends to present a proposal at the 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders, such stockholder must comply with the advance notice provisions of our bylaws. Those provisions require that such proposal must be received by our Secretary at 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504, not earlier than Tuesday, November 10, 20156, 2018 and not later than Thursday, December 10, 2015.6, 2018. Subject to certain exceptions set forth in our bylaws, such proposals must contain specific information concerning the person to be nominated or the matters to be brought before the meeting and concerning the stockholder submitting the proposal.

“HOUSEHOLDING” OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g. brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means additional convenience for stockholders, cost savings for companies and reduced environmental impact of our proxy materials.Proxy Materials.

A number of brokers with accountholders who are stockholders will be “householding” the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. As indicated in the notice previously provided by these brokers to stockholders, a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from an affected stockholder. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that communications to your address will be subject to “householding,” it will continue until you are notified otherwise.

Stockholders who received a householded mailing this year and would like to have additional copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials mailed to them, or would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings should submit a written request to our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at P.O. Box 43010, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3010 Attention: Shareholder Inquiries. We will promptly send additional copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials upon receipt of such request.

Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their broker or, if a stockholder is a direct holder of shares of our common stock, they should submit a written request to our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at P.O. Box 43010, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3010 Attention: Shareholder Inquiries.

VOTING THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE

Our stockholders voting through the internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from access providers that must be borne by the stockholder. To vote by telephone if you are a record holder of our common stock, call toll free1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. To vote by telephone if you are a beneficial owner of our common stock, call the toll free number listed in your Proxy Cardproxy card or follow the instructions provided by your broker. To vote through the internet, go towww.proxyvote.com and follow the steps on the secured website. You also may access the proxyvote website by going to our website,www.cabotcmp.com, selecting “Investor Relations” on our Homepage, and then selecting “Annual Meeting/Proxy” from the dropdown menu.

LOGO

Appendix A

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Purpose

The purpose of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation (the “Company”) is to oversee the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of its financial statements. The Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s accounting and system of internal controls, the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial reports and the independence and performance of the Company’s independent public accountants responsible for the annual audit and quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements (“independent auditor”). In so doing, the Committee should endeavor to maintain free and open means of communication between the members of the Committee, other members of the Board, the independent auditor, the senior and financial management of the Company, and with any employees of the Company or other individuals who desire to bring accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing, or other matters to the Committee’s attention.

In the exercise of its oversight responsibilities, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements fairly present the Company’s financial position and results of operation and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Instead, such duties remain the responsibility of management and the independent auditor. Nothing contained in this charter is intended to alter or impair the operation of the “business judgment rule” as interpreted by the courts under the Delaware General Corporation Law. Further, nothing contained in this charter is intended to alter or impair the right of the members of the Committee under the Delaware General Corporation Law to rely, in discharging their responsibilities, on the records of the Company and on other information presented to the Committee, Board or Company by officers or employees or by outside experts such as the independent auditor.

Membership

The Committee shall consist of at least three members of the Board. The members shall be appointed by action of the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and shall serve at the discretion of the Board. Each Committee member shall satisfy the “independence” and other requirements of relevant law, including rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). At least one member of the Committee shall satisfy the “financial expert” requirements of relevant law, including rules adopted by the SEC, and NASDAQ. Each member of the Committee shall be able to read and understand financial statements at the time of his or her appointment.

Committee Organization and Procedures

1.  The Chair of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board by majority vote. The Chair (or in his or her absence, a member designated by the Chair) shall preside at all meetings of the Committee.

2.  The Committee shall have the authority to establish its own rules and procedures consistent with the bylaws of the Company for notice and conduct of its meetings, should the Committee, in its discretion, deem it desirable to do so. Members of the Committee may participate telephonically in any meeting. A majority of the

members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and the action of a majority of the members present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the Committee.

3.  The Committee shall meet as frequently as the Committee in its discretion deems desirable.

4.  The Committee may, in its discretion, include in its meetings members of the Company’s management, representatives of the independent auditor, outside counsel, the director of internal audit and other personnel employed or retained by the Company, the Board or the Committee. The Committee shall meet periodically and as it deems appropriate with the independent auditor or the director of internal audit, outside counsel or other advisors in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee believes should be addressed privately, without management’s presence, and also shall meet periodically and as it deems appropriate in separate executive sessions with the Company’s management.

5.  The Committee may, in its discretion, retain and utilize the services of the Company’s regular corporate legal counsel with respect to legal matters or its other advisors with respect to other matters or, at its discretion, retain other legal counsel or other advisors if it determines that such counsel or advice is necessary or appropriate under the circumstances.

6.  The Committee shall have its own funding from the Company to pay for the services of the Company’s independent auditors and any legal counsel or other advisors that are retained by the Committee.

7.  The Secretary and General Counsel of the Company shall serve as Secretary of the Committee.

Responsibilities

Independent Auditor

8.  The Committee has the sole and direct responsibility for selecting, appointing, terminating, compensating and overseeing the Company’s independent auditor, as well as for resolving any disagreements between the independent auditors and management. The Committee shall only retain as independent auditor a firm, including representatives of the firm responsible for the Company’s audit, that meets the requirements of relevant law, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the SEC and NASDAQ. The independent auditor shall be accountable to the Committee for all matters, including the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and related services. The Committee shall select, appoint and periodically evaluate the performance of the independent auditor and, if necessary, replace the independent auditor. At the discretion of the Committee or to the extent required by relevant law, NASDAQ or the SEC, the Committee shall recommend to the Board the nomination of the independent auditor for stockholder ratification at any meeting of stockholders.

9.  The Committee shall pre-approve the fees to be paid to the independent auditor and any other terms of the engagement of the independent auditor for any and all services (whether auditing services, audit-related services, tax services or permitted other (non-audit) services), to be provided by the independent auditor, in advance of such services being provided. The Committee may delegate such pre-approval of services to the Committee Chair, and the Committee Chair shall provide subsequent notification to the Committee of any such pre-approval at the next scheduled meeting of the Committee.

10.  The Committee shall receive from the independent auditor and review, at least annually, a written statement delineating all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company, consistent with the PCAOB’s Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence (Rule 3526). The Committee shall actively engage in a dialogue with the independent auditor with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that, in the view of the Committee, may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditor. If the Committee determines that further inquiry is advisable, the Committee shall take any appropriate action in response to the independent auditor’s report to satisfy itself of the auditor’s independence.

Annual Audit

11.  The Committee shall meet with the independent auditor and management of the Company in connection with each annual audit to discuss the scope of the audit and the procedures to be followed.

12.  The Committee shall review and discuss the audited financial statements with the management of the Company.

13.  The Committee shall discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB AU Section 380 Communications with Audit Committees as then in effect including, among others, (i) the methods used to account for any significant unusual transaction reflected in the audited financial statements; (ii) the effect of significant and critical accounting policies in any controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or a consensus to be followed by the independent auditor; (iii) the process used by management in formulating particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the independent auditor’s conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates; and (iv) any disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles, the basis for management’s accounting estimates or the disclosures in the financial statements.

14.  The Committee shall, based on the review and discussions in paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 above, and based on the disclosures received from the independent auditor regarding its independence and discussions with the independent auditor regarding such independence in paragraph 10 above, recommend to the Board whether the audited financial statements should be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year subject to the audit.

15.  The Committee shall review and discuss with management, including the director of internal audit and, at its discretion, any provider of internal audit services, and the independent auditor the Company’s internal controls report and the independent auditor’s attestation of the report prior to the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year subject to the audit.

Quarterly Review

16.  The independent auditor is required to review the interim financial statements to be included in any Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company using professional standards and procedures for conducting such reviews, as established by generally accepted auditing standards as modified or supplemented by the SEC, prior to the filing of the Form 10-Q. The Committee shall discuss with management and the independent auditor in person, at a meeting, or by conference telephone call, the results of the quarterly review including such matters as significant adjustments, management judgments, accounting estimates, significant new accounting policies and disagreements with management. The Chair may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this discussion.

Internal Controls

17.  The Committee shall discuss with the independent auditor and the director of internal audit, as well as management, at least quarterly, the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting, financial and internal controls of the Company, and consider any recommendations for improvement of such internal control procedures.

18.  The Committee shall be provided, and discuss with, the independent auditor and with management any material written communications between the independent auditor and management, including any summary of aggregated deficiencies or management letter provided by the independent auditor (or other auditor) and any other significant matters brought to the attention of the Committee by the independent auditor (or other auditor) as a result of its annual or other audit. The Committee should allow management adequate time to consider any such matters raised by the independent auditor (or other auditor).

19.  The Committee shall meet with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other Company management as appropriate and as required by relevant law, including rules adopted by the SEC, PCAOB, and NASDAQ, on a regular basis to discuss the Company’s internal controls structure and procedures and status, and disclosure controls and procedures and status.

Internal Audit

20.  The Committee shall review and preapprove the selection of the Company’s director of internal audit, and any termination of employment of such person. The Committee shall be notified in advance of, and at its discretion review and preapprove, the selection of any third party provider of internal audit services. The Chair may represent the entire Committee for purposes of these matters.

21.  The Committee shall discuss at least quarterly with the director of internal audit and, at its discretion other provider(s) of internal audit services (if any), the activities and organizational structure of the Company’s internal audit function and the qualification of the primary personnel performing such function.

22.  Management shall furnish to the Chair a copy of each internal audit report, and provide summaries thereof to the Committee, to whom it shall furnish a copy of each internal audit report if so requested by the Committee or any of its members.

23.  The Committee shall, at its discretion, meet with the director of internal audit and other provider(s) of internal audit services (if any) to discuss any reports or any other matters brought to the attention of the Committee by the director of internal audit or other provider(s) of internal audit services (if any).

24.  The director of internal audit and other provider(s) of internal audit services (if any) shall be granted unfettered access to the Committee.

Other Responsibilities

25.  The Committee shall review and reassess the Committee’s charter at least annually and submit any recommended changes to the Board for its consideration.

26.  The Committee shall review and assess the Committee’s fulfillment of its responsibilities pursuant to the Committee’s charter at least annually and submit its conclusions in this regard to the Board for its consideration.

27.  The Committee shall provide the report for inclusion in the Company’s Annual Proxy Statement required by Item 407 of Regulation S-K of the SEC.

28.  The Committee shall establish procedures in compliance with requirements of relevant law, including rules adopted by the SEC, and NASDAQ, for addressing matters and complaints brought to the Committee’s attention by employees of the Company or other individuals regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing, or other matters, and shall ensure that such complaints brought by employees are treated confidentially and anonymously to the extent required by law.

29.  The Committee shall be responsible for receiving, dealing with, and responding to legal compliance reports relating to actual or alleged material violations of the securities laws, material breaches of fiduciary duties, or similar material violations.

30.  The Committee shall have direct access to the Company’s General Counsel, who serves as the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, and who has operational responsibility for the Company’s compliance and ethics program, who in turn shall have direct reporting obligations to the Committee for related matters.

31.  The Committee shall review and approve any related party transaction in advance of the Company’s entering into any such related party transaction, and shall subsequently inform the Board of any such approval.

The Committee, through its Chair, shall report periodically, as deemed necessary or desirable by the Committee, but at least following its regularly scheduled meetings, to the full Board regarding the Committee’s actions and recommendations, if any.

LOGO

Appendix B

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICY FOR SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED

BY INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of Cabot Microelectronics Corporation (the “Corporation”) has the sole and direct responsibility for selecting, appointing, terminating, compensating and overseeing the Company’s independent auditor, as well as for resolving any disagreements between the independent auditors and management. Pursuant to the Committee’s Charter, the Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the Corporation’s independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Each type of service provided by the independent auditor will require specific pre-approval at a particular fee level by the Committee.

The Committee, through the Controller of the Corporation or another designated individual, will maintain a list of the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and All Other services that have been pre-approved by the Committee as of the particular date of the relevant list (the “List”), and will revise the list periodically, based on subsequent determinations of the Committee. The term of any pre-approval is twelve (12) months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Committee specifically provides for a different period.

 

I.Delegation

The Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Committee, and may delegate such pre-approval authority to others members of the Committee. The Chairman will report any pre-approval decisions to the Committee no later than at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.

II.Audit Services

The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Committee. The Committee will approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope or other matters.

In addition to the annual Audit services engagement approved by the Committee, the Committee may grant pre-approval for other Audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide and such Audit services will be placed on the List. All other Audit services not on the List must be separately pre-approved by the Committee.

III.Audit-Related Services

Audit-related services, including internal control-related services, are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Corporation’s financial statements and that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. The Committee believes that the provision of Audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor. The List will contain the pre-approved Audit-related services. All other Audit-related services not on the List, and all internal control-related services, must be separately pre-approved by the Committee.

IV.Tax Services

The Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide Tax services to the Corporation such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence. However, the Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The List will contain those Tax services that the Committee has pre-approved. All other Tax services not on the List must be separately pre-approved by the Committee.

V.All Other Services

The Committee may grant pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor. The List will contain All Other services that the Committee has pre-approved. Permissible All Other services not on the List must be separately pre-approved by the Committee.

A list of the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) prohibited non-audit services is attached to this policy as Exhibit 1. The SEC’s rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

VI.Pre-Approval Fee Levels

At the time of pre-approval of services to be provided by the independent auditor, the Committee will establish an approved fee level for such services. Any increase in the fee level for such services will require additional specific pre-approval by the Committee.

VII.Supporting Documentation

With respect to each proposed pre-approved service, the Committee will be provided with detailed back-up documentation, regarding the specific services to be provided.

VIII.Procedures

Requests to provide services will be submitted to the Committee by both the independent auditor and the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Controller, or other designated officer, and each will state whether, in their view, the request is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

EXHIBIT 1

PROHIBITED NON-AUDIT SERVICES

Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client*

Financial information systems design and implementation

Appraisal or valuation services*, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports

Actuarial services*

Internal audit outsourcing services*

Management functions

Human resources

Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services

Legal services

Expert services unrelated to the audit

(* may be allowed in limited circumstances if reasonable to conclude that the results of these services will not be subject to audit procedures; check relevant SEC rules)

LOGO  

LOGO

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

LOGO

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION2018 Proxy Statement

ATTN: H. CAROL BERNSTEIN

870 N. COMMONS DRIVE

AURORA, IL 60504

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

Investor Address Line 1

Investor Address Line 2

Investor Address Line 3

Investor Address Line 4

Investor Address Line 5

John Sample

1234 ANYWHERE STREET

ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

    57


LOGO

CONTROL #    LOGO

NAME

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - COMMON

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS A

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS B

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS C

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS D

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS E

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS F

THE COMPANY NAME INC. - 401 K

SHARES

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

123,456,789,012.12345

 

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION ATTN: H. CAROL BERNSTEIN 870 N. COMMONS DRIVE AURORA, IL 60504 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 1 OF 2 1 1 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC. - COMMON THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS A THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS B THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS C THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS D THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS E THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS F THE COMPANY NAME INC. - 401 K CONTROL # 0000000000000000 SHARES 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 PAGE 1 OF 2 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: x

PAGE             1    OF             2

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 02 0000000000 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Barbara A. Klein 02 David H. Li 03 William P. Noglows The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 2 Non-binding stockholder advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation. 3 Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2018. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. 0000350610_1 R1.0.1.17 JOB # SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

 

For
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any
individual nominee(s), mark “For All
Except” and write the number(s) of the
nominee(s) on the line below.
LOGO
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1.Election of Directors¨¨¨

Nominees

01

Barbara A. Klein          02   David H. Li          03   William P. Noglows          

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report, Telephone/Internet insert (BR supplied) is/are available at www.proxyvote.com CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS MARCH 6, 2018- 8:00 A.M. Central Standard Time THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned stockholder of CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby appoints William P. Noglows and H. Carol Bernstein, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to attend and act for the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 8:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, at Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, 870 N. Commons Drive, Aurora, IL 60504, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, and in connection therewith to vote and represent all of the shares of common stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote. Each of the above-named proxies at said meeting, either in person or by substitute, shall have and exercise all of the powers said hereunder. In their discretion, each of the above-named proxies is authorized to vote upon such other business incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting as may properly come before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes all prior proxies given by the undersigned to vote at said meeting. If no instructions are indicated herein, this proxy will be treated as a grant of authority to vote for the proposals and any other matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting or at any postponements or adjournments thereof. CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE 0000350610_2 R1.0.1.17

ForAgainstAbstain

2

To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, executive compensation.

¨

¨

¨

3

Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2015.

¨

¨

¨

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

SHARES

CUSIP #

SEQUENCE #

   Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

JOB #

             Signature (Joint Owners)Date
        0000223932_1 R1.0.0.5116002 0000000000


LOGO
LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report, Telephone/Internet insert (BR supplied) is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

LOGO

CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS MARCH 3, 2015- 8:00 A.M.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned stockholder of CABOT MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby appoints William P. Noglows and H. Carol Bernstein, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to attend and act for the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 8:00 a.m., local time at Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, 870 North Commons Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60504, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, and in connection therewith to vote and represent all of the shares of common stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote.

Each of the above-named proxies at said meeting, either in person or by substitute, shall have and exercise all of the powers said hereunder. In their discretion, each of the above-named proxies is authorized to vote upon such other business incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting as may properly come before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes all prior proxies given by the undersigned to vote at said meeting.

If no instructions are indicated herein, this proxy will be treated as a grant of authority to vote for the proposals and any other matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting or at any postponements or adjournments thereof.

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE

0000223932_2    R1.0.0.51160